Cool Cat Stroll

It it any shock to anyone with a brain that the biden administration tries to play with a different rule book? F’n hypocrites.

So true... LOL

Oh, no. It's not true in the slightest.

CFR § 600.1 - Grounds for appointing a Special Counsel.

The Attorney General, or in cases in which the Attorney General is recused, the Acting Attorney General, will appoint a Special Counsel when he or she determines that criminal investigation of a person or matter is warranted and—

(a) That investigation or prosecution of that person or matter by a United States Attorney's Office or litigating Division of the Department of Justice would present a conflict of interest for the Department or other extraordinary circumstances; and

(b) That under the circumstances, it would be in the public interest to appoint an outside Special Counsel to assume responsibility for the matter.

Here's the entire section about the special counsel: https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/28/part-600

Note how there's nothing about a requirement about a President or approved by the senate.

Nothing.

It's at the descretion of the Attorney General or Acting Attorney General.

I think I'll trust the opinion filed by a former US Attorney General... more than you...

Oh, go trust the law.

It's more reliable than an opinion. Opinions can be baseless and factless.

The law is easy.

According to US Law CFR § 600.1 - Grounds for appointing a Special Counsel.

The Attorney General, or in cases in which the Attorney General is recused, the Acting Attorney General, will appoint a Special Counsel when he or she determines that criminal investigation of a person or matter is warranted

You live in a fantasy land devoid of facts and disconnected from reality.

Yes... your hero has a history of bad prosecutions... and is now under investigation by the IG for extortion...

I think Jack Smith will be gone soon... LOL

They blew they're chance.

Trump or Hunter?

I really find the hunter thing inconsequential

I reckon what I'm asking you is who blew their chance at what?

Oh....the dems blew their chance to get Trump before the election. He's absolutely running now

😄 I'll let you slide.

You are probably preoccupied with preparing yourself for the holidays.

oh, yeah?

Please explain.

In detail.

Feel free to use as many charts, graphs, or visual aids as you need.

Explain?

Please explain how Jack Smith's appointment is unconstitutional.

Oh, bc his appointment was supposed to be recommended by the president and approved by senate. Neither happend.

Go find who ever told you that, and tell them to send their law degree back to whatever diploma mill they got it from, cause they're wrong.

CFR § 600.1 - Grounds for appointing a Special Counsel.

The Attorney General, or in cases in which the Attorney General is recused, the Acting Attorney General, will appoint a Special Counsel when he or she determines that criminal investigation of a person or matter is warranted and—

(a) That investigation or prosecution of that person or matter by a United States Attorney's Office or litigating Division of the Department of Justice would present a conflict of interest for the Department or other extraordinary circumstances; and

(b) That under the circumstances, it would be in the public interest to appoint an outside Special Counsel to assume responsibility for the matter.

Here's the entire section about the special counsel: https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/28/part-600

Note how there's nothing about a requirement about a President or approved by the senate.

Nothing.

It's at the descretion of the Attorney General or Acting Attorney General.

Ummm. They denied JS his speedy case lol.

And?

What does that have to do with the Constitutionality of his appointment?

Do you think it's weird that Trump demanded that the Supreme Court deny Smith's request?

Would you want that delay if your defense was "I was the President. I can't be prosecuted"? Wouldn't you want that settled as quickly as possible?

Because if that is a valid legal defense, that ends the case right now.

Why delay?

Why would an innocent man waive his right to a speedy trial and demand delay after delay after delay?

I mean, it's the perfect venue to release all that voter fraud evidence he claims he's got in a nice big beautiful report.

Ummm do you know why it was denied?

There's no reason given bc he's not recognized lol.

That is some weapons grade QAnonsense right there.

If Smith's appointment is invalid or whatever, why hasn't Trump filed a motion to dismiss the case?

Seems like that'd be step 1.

If I, a person who is not a lawyer, can think up that legal strategy, why haven't his highly paid lawyers done that?

Even to get it in an appeal, he has to file the motion in the original trial. That way it's a part of the procedure, and can be overturned because of the mistake made by the court.

Why hasn't he done that?

4 D chess or... or is it the simpler answer: that's some bullshit.

Because it's some bullshit. That's why.

The SCOTUS denied the writ. That's it. That's all you know. Thre was no minority or dissenting opinion. Just the denial.

Anything after that is factless opinion.

So what's my factless opinion? They denied it because Trump & Smith don't get to jump the line. They have to go through the appeal process just like everyone else.

They're going to end up hearing the case. That's a given. It will end up there. But they likely, again not a lawyer so this is a factless opinion, want the process to play out before they have to make a decision.

Lol he's definitely in the election baby