Leftist Logic on Pro-Birth

Why not be a responsible adult and not get pregnant in the first place? Probably because the person asking the question doesn’t mind the goobermint taking care of them their whole life.

If they got pregnant involuntarily does that justify murder?

I don't understand. Did the baby rape her?

I guess you missed my point about the guilty party. Let's go a different route. If I made exceptions for cases of rape and incest would you ban abortion for the rest of the 98% of cases where abortion happens?

Right, so you think murdering babies for the sake of convenience should be legal. I gotcha. Now we're getting somewhere. What other types of people do you think we should be able to murder for the sake of convenience? Handicapped people? Maybe Jews?

So then you're against abortion? We'll go through "fertilized eggs aren't people." Okay, so I'll meet you there for now. When does the fertilized egg become a person?

So you don't know the exact moment a fertilized egg becomes a baby? How can you even begin to address when it's okay to have an abortion which is the killing of a baby for the sake of convenience? If you don't know then having an abortion at any point could possibly be murder. Are you okay with that? Given that you don't know it seems to me you'd want to err on the side of life rather than on the side of murder. Now that we're getting into philosophy.

It's kinda like when a baby becomes a toddler, isn't it? There's maybe not an exact moment a baby becomes a toddler? That's because these are all stages of human life. Baby, toddler, child, kid, pre-teen, teen, young adult, adult. You get what I'm saying. The reason it's important for you to answer is because you're de-personing a certain stage of life. I'm not so I don't have to answer that question. I say all stages of life are a person.

If my definition of abortion is inaccurate then what's your definition?

Given that my definition is so broad as to be useless then, it's even more incumbent on you to define when that fertilized egg becomes a baby lest you commit murder. So the ball's still in your court on that one. If a woman terminates a pregnancy does that result in the ending of the life that was inside her womb?

So then you should err on the side of life so you don't commit murder. Why are you erring on the side of murder? Philosophically and ethically your stance is indefensible. Unless you want to admit you're amoral and unethical.

For some women the prospect of NOT spreading their legs is too much to bear!

Abortion is baby murder.

Pro-life, pro-birth...semantic word play.

Nonsense word games do not change the fact that the deliberate taking of human life is murder.

If that makes one feel guilty, it should.

If that makes one angry, I do not care.