Baisc fact:

That is not a fact, that is a hypothetical scenario with nothing to back it up othr than modern human behavior.

I mean neanderthals where physically stronger than humans, this would allow them to carry human women to diddle them in their places. However to capture human women, male neanders would have to rely on ambushing, since their short legs and ankle bones prevented them from running. Also chimpanzees have been recorded practising coercion too, so who is not the say that neanderthals did not practice it to, or at least certain individuals??? In fact, a study found that Neanderthals would be more competitive for mates and promiscous than humans, possibly indicating higher aggresion aswell: https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/11/101103081915.htm

"diddle" what a cute way to refer to rape.
Again, you're using supposition, not actual facts.

And chimps do not go for humans

It is a fact. A lot of animals, including primates, practice coercion. So it is clearly obvious that at least certain neanderthals did practice coercion. Both to their own females and to female humans and denisovans.

Also chimps don't go for humans because they are not in the Homo genus but their own: Pan.

Also did you read everything I said and the article???

No, it is not a fact.

You just cant type "its not a fact" without adressong my points. Also its worth noting that male neanderthals and female humans are more closer in size, allowing for the matings of this two to be less difficult. Male humans and female neanders differed more in size, maling the matings between this two more difficult. So taking in consideration that the matings where PRIMARILY between human women and male neanders, and how common coercion is in animals, we can say that certain male neanders coerced female humans in certain occasions.

Again, false, and you know it.
Now Sapiens females were close to the size of Neanderthal males? Wow, those were some bulky females.

Stop making stuff up to fit these strange fixations.

-Prove it then. Adress how am I wrong.

-Humans are gracile, not bulky. Thing is, Neanderthals are shorter than humans, and females of both species are smaller than the males (like in most mammals). So by using math you can see that male neanders and female humans are closer in size while female neanders and male humans have a mayor size difference. As such the matings between male neanders and female humans would be more easier while the opposite would be somewhat more difficult due to the greater size difference.

Nothing to prove. You're making up stuff.

You're also contradicting youself about stronger or not.

Also, where do you live that men and women couples are the same size (not that Neanderthal M and Sapiens F were)?

-If am making stuff up then explain how and prove it.

-Taller=/=stronger. Humans are taller and more gracile, neanderthals are shorter and more robust. And no i never contradicted myself. Once again if I am wrong then address my points.

-What are you talking about?? Usually men are bigger and stronger than women (like in most mammal species).

I cannot prove your fantasies nor would care to.

other*

Also you forget Haldane's Rule, which, incidentally, you always used to bring up.

To date no Neanderthal Y-DNA markers have been found in modern humans. Doesn't mean male Neanderthals didn't mate with Sapiens females, but that we only have evidence of Neanderthal females with Sapien males.

You used to also mention that Sapiens had larger communities while Neanderthals were antisocial and practically solitary. Hard to kidnap, carry away, and rape when you're solo against a big group.

You're offering conjecture that if true, it would have been the reverse, species-wise, which, given what we know about modern humans' propensity towards rape, unfortunately was very likely the case, and gang-wise, as well. Kill the males, rape the females. En masse. And thus they went extinct as a species, the women leaving behind hybrids now known as Caucasoids.

Looking at the logs, I see a bunch of your comments were deleted on this stream, including a couple I saw of which deletion wasn't warranted (except the repeating of one on a meme).
Were you provided a reason for this?

No I was not. In fact I never got any notif. All I did was pointing out the misinformation in certain memes and my comments got deleted. Pribably by the one who male those memes.

7 of your comments were deleted for no reason by another stream mod, meanwhile said mod unbanned Jeffrey Stone's latest! I just saw this last night.
That mod banned me from here over a year ago for fake reasons as well.

Btw I found the mod who deleted my comments, its this one: imgflip.com/user/AlaskaNativeManitou

I criticized 3 of their memes and all of a sudden my comments on them disappeared days later.

I already knew from the mod log, I clipped off the name of that user.

Did the same to me and banned me as well over a year ago for comments about Gigantopithicus being an ape and about people eating American megafauna because apparently they just cuddled with them and ate snow instead.

I told you did stream had problems

Here, tell this Site Mod (who also mods this stream as well)

imgflip.com/user/snorlax.

Tell him I saw this and sent you.