There is stupid..... and then there is Liberal AOC stupid....

We discovered fire over 200,000 years ago. Split the atom 90 years ago. But female Democrats STILL cannot identify biological men from biological women by sight in 2023!!!! Freaking spiders, lizards, ants, and dogs can do this!

It's conservatives who are always talking about examining peoples genitals. Creepy as f**k

Really? Because it sounds like AOC is the one talking about examining people's genitals.
I'm curious if you can find even one quote from a conservative saying anything about examining people's genitals.
Meanwhile many liberals make that claim, as a strawman.

Your reply is based on a communist talking about genitals...you realize that don't you?

But it’s not an Invisation of privacy when the school secretly puts a biological boy to share rooms with a girl that is only 11 years old? Just because the boy identifies as a girl? Then it’s perfectly fine to violate the little girl rights and privacy for the comfort of that…

— PitunisWorld (@ScMesab) December 5, 2023

Bathrooms have privacy stalls. At least women's bathrooms do. I assume mens do as well.
A better example for the point youre trying to make would be locker rooms where women may involuntarily encounter an exposed p**is.

A woman enters the men's room - I have no gut wrenching feeling of dread thinking she's come to rape me (perhaps wishful thinking is she's pretty).

A man, whether crossdressed or wearing traditional male garb, enters a woman's room - I believe, no matter what you type here, there is at least a fleeting moment of gut wrenching dread of being assaulted in some fashion.

I am a woman, I've never had that fear, as women's restrooms are seldom empty.
The factors that would make me wince are the ability to isolate and trap me. In a busy women's restroom, that is not a situation likely to occur. I'm mote likely to encounter this fear walking home from the Bus stop as I pass an empty alley.

You know predator types stalk, lurk, lay in wait.

*Not saying all crossdressers seeking entitlement to use women's restrooms are rapists.

I am saying it only take one to change your life.

Why give the wolf the sheep's clothing and access to barn?

You've been in an empty restroom from time to time.

You're telling me you, not once, got an uneasy feeling hearing the door open?

Does your stated comfort speak for all women?

The majority?

I do not want my daughter, as a minor or as an adult, in a restroom with a man in a dress no matter the privacy walls or the number of others.

You have much greater odds of being accosted in a parking garage than in a women's room by a man dressed as a woman but people often but a winning lottery ticket do they not?

You don't want to win this prize.

"You have much greater odds of being accosted in a parking garage than in a women's room by a man dressed as a woman"

So you want to make rules based on feelings, not facts. A feeling of unease (or fear) and being "triggered" when someone enters the restroom. Even though that feeling may have little to no basis in reality. Isn't that what liberals do?

Feelings? They have their place in interpersonal relationships.

"Triggered" makes this sound so sensational.

You exampled the wrong text in your replying comment.

"You're telling me you, not once, got an uneasy feeling hearing the door open?"

That is the only reference to feelings I made.

Directing attention away from the topic - is not that what liberals do?

Do you contend no woman has ever been assaulted in a women's restroom by a man in a dress, or a pant suit, or daisy dukes and flirty tank top?

Do you speak for all women?

Do you speak for a majority of women?

Do you speak for any appreciable amount of women?

Men aren't playing in women's sports

That's what is being prevented, yes.

Very astute of you.