What an asinine assumption you're making, with that attempt at deflection.
There's no peer-reviewed research contradicting the subject that you raised. There IS peer-reviewed research that proves that "Social Distancing" and mask mandates were both bogus as public health measures. As PSYOPS they seemed to have worked as intended. In fact, we now have public admissions, that they picked the 6 foot number based upon what they figured the Publix c would accept. Of course that's assuming that even their apparent admissions çan be taken at face-value, and that's a dubious proposition at best. Another theory I heard put forth suggested that the electrical fields generated by the human heart extend out about 3 feet - and hence 6 feet had a subconscious further-alienating effect.
You know that we DO have some public indications of intent and coordination, in advance of the BioWeaponized Virus being released, right? I mean, there was the Rockefeller Foundation's LOCKSTEP scenario, published openly, circa 2009. We have Bill Gates' ODD statements about Global Population reductions of 90% being his goal, a little later, in a TED talk. AgendaID2020 (that's the Vaxx Passports and Global Digital ID) - a plan announced publicly no later than 2016. We have Fauci clairvoyantly predicting a Pandemic would emerge during Trump's term, back in 2017... And then we have "exercises" like SPARS and Event201.
And of course there's the odd fact that MODeRNA owns a patent, on an essential sequence from the BioWeaponized virus. Add to that the fact that MODeRNA (a DARPA spin-off) had never successfully marketed a product before 2020, and were about to go belly-up, and without an "Emergency", the synthetic experimental modRNA gene therapy injections would NEVER have passed a normal trials process, with longterm studies, etc..
All of that argues for there being more to the Plandemic, than met the eye.
Rather than bringing up a strawman argument - why not make some baseless assertion, that something I wrote was incorrect? Then - I can produce the relevant citations or public health data, to show how incorrect you are.
