Typical Brave Social Warriors

That is textbook PROPAGANDA 101.

A common tactic of the mentally,physically, and ideologically weak.

Another is NEVER RESPOND TO A QUESTION WITH A DIRECT ANSWER.

Yet another is "BROWN SHIRT" ANY IN DISAGREEMENT

They are pesky like fruit flies to be shooed away or ignored and nothing more.

Nah bruh, gotta start with actual facts or no one cares except to make fun of you.

The problem is, you gotta know the difference between truth and facts, first. I mean, it's not my issue... but...

Truth is facts. It's delusional to think otherwise.

A fact is something that's indisputable, based on empirical research and quantifiable measures. Facts go beyond theories. They're proven through calculation and experience, or they're something that definitively occurred in the past. Truth is entirely different; it may include fact, but it can also include belief and/or bias.
It would be wholly naive and maybe even willfully ignorant to think otherwise.

No, truth does not include belief or bias. Another word they are trying to redefine.

That maybe true to you, but not for me. It seems we can't even agree on simple facts.

Exactly why you will never understand because you've redefined important words that oppose your viewpoint. We call that brainwashing. You literally cannot conceive that you might be wrong.

I just gave you an example of how the words are used by my definition and you agreed to that usage. Thank you for making my point for me.

As for the definitions of Truth and Fact? I admit that I could be wrong as the definitions of Truth versus fact are more philosophical and are often included and discussed with the word "reality" which, is also based on subjective worldviews. Your reality is not my reality. Your truth is not my truth; facts are neutral.

"You literally cannot conceive that you might be wrong."
Classic projection.

What's your next move, backpedaling or deflecting?

There is an objective reality that is truth (meaning non subjective reality). Individuals have viewpoints that may or may not align with truth. Facts are part of truth. You redifined truth to mean "belief" because it lets you play word games.

You're defining objective reality in the first person which is based on subjective truth. To that person, what they have witnessed is an objective reality. Much like for instance, you can record a fight happen and an unhinged person beats the living tar out of another for no reason. That's your reality, objective as you've witnessed it. The facts of this issue are not represented which shows that this person who got their ass beat had done something to endanger the life of the other creating a provoked response. Those are facts that exist beyond the reality, the truth, and the belief of the audience.

Stop playing word games. You're not good at it. Not surprising since this is a Liberal Arts in Philosophy discussion. I wonder how many times you said it was a useless degree.