Imgflip Logo Icon

“Abhorrent and morally repugnant” - Gov. Kathy Hochul and other leading Democrats

“Abhorrent and morally repugnant” - Gov. Kathy Hochul and other leading Democrats | GOV. KATHY HOCHUL AND OTHER LEADING DEMOCRATS BLASTED THE RALLY AS “ABHORRENT AND MORALLY REPUGNANT”; CHEERING FOR THE SAME HAMAS THAT IS KIDNAPPING, TORTURING, AND KILLING AMERICANS OVERSEAS; MEANWHILE, THE SQUAD REMAINS SILENT ABOUT THE NYC RALLY | image tagged in the squad,palestine,psychopaths and serial killers | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
914 views 31 upvotes Made by AmericanViking 1 year ago in politics
44 Comments
11 ups, 1y,
3 replies
Leftists side with terrorists. No surprise there.
7 ups, 1y,
1 reply
On Sunday, 260 bodies were recovered by a ZAKA response team from the site of a music festival in Israel where Hamas militants opened fire on partygoers during their assault on the country.

According to Israel National News, this brings the death toll to 600 people killed and over 2,000 injured.
7 ups, 1y,
1 reply
HAMAS has simply given Israel no other choice but to surrender or remove the 'nation' of Palestine from existence. Or in other words, to conquer the territory and keep it. It's either that or concede that removal of Israel itself as a nation is now a viable possibility. I think that this is going to be REAL war as opposed to the extended decades long series of 'police actions' that corrupt U.S. politicians and our equally corrupt Industrial Military Complex routinely have us engaged in. As always, time will tell.
3 ups, 1y
made w/ Imgflip meme maker
7 ups, 1y
yup... no surprise at all...
5 ups, 1y,
1 reply
Then it's war, and if Israel destroys the 'state' of Palestine, well that's what happens in wars.
3 ups, 1y,
1 reply
But the WAR - against the Palestinians was officially started in 1947-48 (actually the Stern Gang and Irgun go back to the Balfour Declaration) - with a series of unquestionable WARCRIMES - and has only picked up steam since then. Gaza is an open air prison - with the highest population density on Earth, and Population that's 1/2 Children.

I'm not a big fan of Hamas, but I understand why they have popular support. And let's not forget that they were started with the assistance of the Zionist-Apartheid State entity - which sought to split the Palestinian resistance, which under the PLO was multi-ethnic, and make it better fit into Huntington's "Clash of Civilizations" narrative. And now it does - qu'elle surprisè.

The problem with your logic - is that the genocide, displacement, 'ethnic cleansing', torture and thefts always continue, whether the Palestinians resist or not. It is VERY UNLIKELY that the Shin Bet and Mossad didn't see this coming, and assist the success - in order to justify the murderous plans that Smotrich and BenGivr have been working on, all along.

Killing innocents is a Warcrime (both sides have adopted that tactic)... And so is positioning military assets among the civilian population - but on that front, the Palestinians have no real choice, since they have no areas that aren't being increasingly overcrowded - as illegal Zionist settlement push them off any land they have, developed or not.

Let's not forget whom it was that Bombed the King David Hotel. Overt Terrorism was once part of the Zionist Playbook, as well - along side the Genocide and 'ethnic cleansing'.
5 ups, 1y,
1 reply
I didn't say that it would not be an INTERESTING war. The fact that Israel has seen fit to redeclare it original declaration of war, moves it into the HOT war category rather than the attack/limited response back and forth that it has been for decades. I suspect that when it is all said and done, Israel will 'win' and that the issue of Palestine as a viable nation will then be moot. But time will tell.
1 up, 1y
How about an State like any other, compliant with both International law, and Jewish law, which respects the rights and languages and religions of all people?

Because the Zionist Apartheid State - is NOT that. Have you seen the way that they spit on Christians, and treat them? It's not Kosher.
8 ups, 1y,
1 reply
When it comes to the Squad…Silence is Golden!
7 ups, 1y,
1 reply
they're antisemitic... so...
2 ups, 1y,
1 reply
The definition of "Antisemitism" has been debased and perverted. And it was always a made-up, nonsense term - a thought-terminating cliché. The Palestinians and Saudis and Syrians and Lebanese - are ALL Semitic people. Al Sham - from ISIS - means "of Shem".

They #FraudSquad have plenty to answer for - but standing up for the rights of Palestinians, and saying relatively uncontroversial truths, that even reasonable Jews acknowledge, about the nature of power in DC, aren't to be found amongst their crimes or sins.
3 ups, 1y,
1 reply
well... it is the truth...so
1 up, 1y
Start with a meaningless, nonsense term - then distort that meaning to include all sorts of political positions that are totally reasonable and just... and I suppose you can make that claim, accurately.

Jewish Voice for Peace (JVP.org) - doesn't agree...

Not all Jews are Zionists. Our opinions matter, too.
[deleted]
8 ups, 1y,
1 reply
Notice how none of the usual suspects are here on this thread? It seems even the radical left, here, condemn this.
[deleted]
8 ups, 1y,
1 reply
^^^^sarcasm
2 ups, 1y
They're here under new pseudonyms
3 ups, 1y,
1 reply
1 up, 1y
https://twitter.com/i/status/1711496004846100958
1 up, 1y,
3 replies
7 ups, 1y,
2 replies
Yes... and we know who controlled the land years before that too...
5 ups, 1y,
2 replies
You are not supposed to go that far back in time! There is a cut-off for these things . . . unless one is a U.S. based nation-hating leftist pointing out that EVIL Europeans 'invaded' the New World and took all the lands from the native populations . . . that if one went far enough back in time, themselves frequently took the land from preceding groups of 'natives'. Interesting how our leftists ALWAYS have a cut-off point for this stuff.
5 ups, 1y,
2 replies
Both sides use the historically we're correct argument... but when you go back as far as you can go, the record shows the land belonged to the Jewish people... The only reason why Israel grew in size from the creation in the 40s, is because of the aggression from all sides... Of course like any other country, they wanted assurances that would never happen again, and since they didn't get that they were forced to take measures to ensure it.
5 ups, 1y,
2 replies
This is correct. Simply stop threatening Israel and definitely cease attacking the people. It's not rocket science, except -- apparently -- to terrorists and most leftists.
5 ups, 1y
Yup... Egypt got back what it lost when they stopped attacking Israel...
0 ups, 1y,
1 reply
So you support the policy of Theft and Genocide, that the Zionists have been engaged in, for more that 100 years, now? Because Gaza is the most densely packed, open air prison on Earth. The Illegal settlement activity in the West Bank, and deliberate provocations on the Temple Mount have been increasing for more than two decades.
[deleted]
0 ups, 1y,
1 reply
100 years? Are you serious? You have no clue what you’re talking about and are way above your pay grade here. This is 4000+ year problem you are trying to condense in snapshot.
0 ups, 1y
Please do some actual research. Political Zionism was a movement created by Hertzl and some others - all of them atheists and assimilationists, mostly from Ukraine. Look for a single Yarmulke in a picture from their first meeting. You won't find it.

And when they succeeded in getting the British to authorize mass migration to Palestine, with the Balfour Declaration (- General Allenby had taken-over Palestine from the Ottoman Empire, at the end of WWI -) the campaign of Zionist Terrorism, and ethnic cleansing against the indigenous population, began in earnest.
What part of that do you dispute? That was ~ 100 years ago. Hence my statement reads as "true" - and not "false" - as your 4000 year statement reads.

How do you claim to know my pay grade?

This is not even close to a 4000 year pld problem. The issues of the Ancient Hebrews, Judeans and Israelites were their own, and settled on their own terms prior to the Diaspora, which was either divinely decreed, fir disobedience to the Almighty - or implemented first by the Babylonians, and then by the Romans, or - perhaps both.

Since that time Torah-faithful Jews have followed Jewish law, abd refrained from returning en masse, and had not sought to create a Jewish Sovereignty, anywhere.

https://youtu.be/v9q4e9zmTL0 Here's a primer on Y you're wrong.

Jews could have returned to the Holy Land at any point. A few actually did, but they did so as subjects of the local rulers, whoever that happened to be, and the went in small numbers. They lived in peace and harmony with their neighbors. They raised each others' children. They were a small part of the larger community in Palestine.

The earliest Zionists were followers of heretical spurious messiahs, like Sabbatai Zevi and Jacob Frank. Their international influence and reach in the Christian and Muslim worlds, may have helped popularize the notion of Zionism, amongst European Elites and Luciferian Occultists, like the Rothschilds. I'll differ to your extensive research, on that topic.

There's a huge difference between Religious Zionism (meaning - waiting for G-d to send a Messiah, to gather up the Tribes and return them to the Holy Land) as an aspiration, left in the hands of the Almighty - and Political Zionism - which is seeking political power and influence to do that by the hands of man. The former has been a central doctrine of the Jewish faith, for ~2000 years. The latter is much younger, ~ 200 years - if we combine the efforts of bigots & Jews
1 up, 1y,
1 reply
That's not as far back as you can go. The Egyptians were there before that. So you're arguing to look only at ine specific point in time - because the Bible - but are then ignoring the Bible, where Jews are forbidden to return, until a day of the Almighty's choosing, not their own...

So who is this Messiah? Lord Balfour or General Allenby? The UN? Hitler or Truman? The Lubavitcher Cult leader? Some member if the Rothschild family? I guess I'm confused.
3 ups, 1y,
1 reply
Recorded... I said...
1 up, 1y,
1 reply
There's archeological records that indicate that Egypt was there, and that the Kingdom of David et al, was an outpost. Otherwise we're looking to a record, and ignoring the self-interests of the authors coinciding with that text.
3 ups, 1y,
1 reply
I haven't seen any Egyptian claims to that land...
1 up, 1y,
2 replies
Nor will you - so long as the Israeli Antiquities Commission has an iron lock on what is released to the press. There's ba whole industry base on creating fake relics. But when you're actually excavating, you find things that are much harder to fake.

The Egyptians were a major world power. Their influence extended far and wide throughout the region. The story of Exodus makes little sense otherwise.
3 ups, 1y,
1 reply
Yes... that's why there are so many stories about their presence in Canaan...LOL
0 ups, 1y
Do you read hieroglyphics?

All the stories you're getting about Canaan - are written by the people who wiped them out.
1 up, 1y,
1 reply
https://twitter.com/i/status/1711714500100141516
0 ups, 1y
https://covertactionmagazine.com/2023/10/11/widening-the-israeli-palestinian-conflict-yellow-journalism-stoking-potential-war-on-iran/

The point not addressed in the video on that Twitter post - is that there's no direct connection between the Kingdom and Roman Colony of 2000+ years ago - and the Zionist-Apartheid abomination created by the Rothschilds and Rockefellers, using the UN, UK and US.

NKUSA.ORG -https://youtu.be/HcWqDGZzIjY
(Audio isn't great - but you can link to many other videos on their YouTube, as well, where people can hear their position explained. https://youtu.be/v9q4e9zmTL0 )
0 ups, 1y
I resent your speaking that way about Mark Twain, Emerson, Thoreau, etc. - all of whom were great Americans.
1 up, 1y
Are we talking about the Turks or the Crusaders, or a Sultan, or the Romans, or the Babylonians, or Judea and David and Solomon or the Egyptians - or the Phoenicians and the Philistines and the Canaanites and Hitites and Samarians? Ancient titles aside (some REVOKED by the Almighty, at least until a Messiah is sent, bringing the Jewish people there, on the wings of Eagles), the people who have lived there for hundreds of years - have rights, which are not exceeded by people from Europe, many of whom come out of Khazaria, converted long after the diaspora began, and have no direct connection - save one created by the UN, and the UK and US Empire.
2 ups, 1y,
1 reply
Israel accepted the original UN, and Palestine didn’t. The land games are a result of Israel winning multiple wars to claim the land.
0 ups, 1y
That's a gross oversimplification and mischaracterization of what actually occurred. But even if true - still amounts to a Warcrime, Annexation of land through military conquest.

The people living there were never consulted, as such they live under Military Occupation, often in the open air prison of Gaza. And the Zionists have continued to eat away at were to be lawfully Palestinian areas, even under the crooked Oslo process. Even the US used to admit this, calling those 'illegal settlement activities". But now we no longer even care to follow most pro forma acknowledgements of International law - at least not as regards our allies. Where it regards the adversaries that we've chosen, we suddenly pretend to be sticklers for International Law - or at least OUR version of it, called the "rules based order". Though we rarely go so far as to state explicitly what those rules are, who writes them, whom they apply to, and who gets to break them with impugnity.

Of course Israel choose to acknowledge the UN's theft of like half of Palestine. It was in their benefit. The Palestinians were the ones being robbed. They have a right to reject that. And the UN didn't grant permission for the massacres and genocide that followed. David Ben Gurion was unwilling to write his orders down, having seen the recent tribunals at Nuremberg, and knowing that they could be applied to him (he wasn't sure yet, that 'the fix was in', and that Israeli Warcrimes would be granted impugnity by US and UK force majeur).
[deleted]
2 ups, 1y,
1 reply
Yep.
2 ups, 1y
So we should decide ALL titles to land based on one specific point in time, THOUSANDS of years ago???
Created with the Imgflip Meme Generator
EXTRA IMAGES ADDED: 1
  • hamsnycprotest.jpg
  • The Squad
  • IMAGE DESCRIPTION:
    GOV. KATHY HOCHUL AND OTHER LEADING DEMOCRATS BLASTED THE RALLY AS “ABHORRENT AND MORALLY REPUGNANT”; CHEERING FOR THE SAME HAMAS THAT IS KIDNAPPING, TORTURING, AND KILLING AMERICANS OVERSEAS; MEANWHILE, THE SQUAD REMAINS SILENT ABOUT THE NYC RALLY