Yo i thought I’d share a story about how I used to hate this stream when I was a hardcore liberal but now it’s the stream that makes way more sense. I’m republican now btw lol
If you mean we are attempting to derail your degenerate agenda, you are correct.
[deleted]
2 ups, 1y,
1 reply
At least you're up front about how much your desire to trample on the rights of undesirables takes precedence over policies that actually help people. Typical fascist brain rot on full display here.
[deleted]
3 ups, 1y
In the same post you claim stopping your degeneracy is fascist.
You don't believe in trampling others rights.
And NAZI lives don't matter. Which would be you.
Are you suicidal, allow me to introduce you to Christ
But then prices would be stable if the government were to pay for your doctor's visit, for your x-rays, or for hospital visits (I mean not seeing someone else that is stuck in hospital).
It's not that prices would freeze, it's that prices won't be gouged. Meaning that there would be a steady increase in price since wages would increase. But living standards would improve
[deleted]
0 ups, 1y,
1 reply
Billions $ a year for rationed substandard health care.
Doctors decide if you are worth extending your life.
Canada rotinually euthanized the I'll and elderly. Coming to a hospital near you, Aussie!
There is a difference between legalisation and decriminalisation. Decriminalisation is when an issue is no longer a criminal issue but still remains illegal (like speeding on a road). Legalisation is when you can do an activity without being fined, charged, indicted, or jailed.
If drugs were to be decriminalised, then it would still mean that the drugs would be illegal but there would be rehabilitation of people to get them off drugs or a $100 fine for drug use. No more jail for druggies who will return to using drugs after their jail time.
You clearly don't know what decriminalisation is. All it is that the crime would remain illegal, but the legal system would not prosecute a person for the act. The penalties would range from no penalties at all to a civil fine.
There is a difference between legalisation and decriminalisation. Decriminalisation is when an issue is no longer a criminal issue but still remains illegal (like speeding on a road). Legalisation is when you can do an activity without being fined, charged, indicted, or jailed.
If drugs were to be decriminalised, then it would still mean that the drugs would be illegal but there would be rehabilitation of people to get them off drugs or a $100 fine for drug use. No more jail for druggies who will return to using drugs after their jail time.
No, decriminalisation would mean no penalty - fine, time, or otherwise.
it literally means that it would no longer be recognized as a crime, which, in effect, makes it legal.
False. I've done some research to prove my claim and fact check yours and it says that "Decriminalisation means it would remain illegal, but the legal system would not prosecute a person for the act. The penalties would range from no penalties at all to a civil fine."
IT COSTS $120 TO FILL MY CAR. IT COSTS $200 TO BUY 5 BAGS OF GROCERIES. IT COSTS $600 A MONTH FOR MY HEALTH INSURANCE... AND WHAT ARE DEMOCRATS WORRIED ABOUT? TRANS WOMEN PLAYING IN FEMALE SPORTS, ABORTION, AND GUN CONTROL....
Caption this Meme 
