EXACTLY
Why are people not terrified that after a sketchy election not a single court would allow a public review of any evidence of fraud?
People think there were trials.
When in reality, we learned there are no consequences for stealing an election in American because no one will even look at the evidence of cheating.
You should really do your homework before you continue to repeat that lie.
It has been thoroughly debunked.
See the latest Cochrane Review meta-analysis for overwhelming EVIDENCE that they knew masking would have no beneficial effect, long before they told you to wear your muzzle like an obedient dog.
German health authorities plead to a parliamentary committee that they have yet to evaluate adverse vaccine events because there are too many of them.
The app was developed by PEI to allow easy reporting of adverse events. … They have received so many reports that they overwhelmed the technical infrastructure supporting the app. Data from 700,000 participants remain unprocessed …
COVID is not magic
Respiratory viruses all get transmitted in the same way.
And you need to go back and read then try to actually understand that meta analysis.
Their conclusion on community level masking was clear: it does not reduce transmission of respiratory viruses in any significant way.
Moreover, we know that masking does actual harm.
You pretending you somehow grasp that research in a way others do not is laughable.
You cut and pasted something you do not understand to fit your narrative.
How many lies do that have to be caught telling before you stop defending them?
How many people have to die as a result of their actions before you realize they are not guided by your best interests, but rather by their own?
Masks don't prevent the spread of germs but they trap them as you breath out so then you get sick from yourself because logic is ambidextrous like that?
See, masks are permeable so they don't work, in fact, because they retain moisture and germs, they can make you sick because logic is a spin the dial contraption!
[deleted]
1 up, 1y,
1 reply
You're trying to be sarcastic but I legit couldn't tell the difference between you and someone who was being serious right now 😂
My assestment could be off, as while the majority in political discussions, yeah, they're still relatively small numbers here and so doubtful any would be in the employ of Russian troll farms.
Could be simply a King of the Hill thing, with them trying to shut out others just to show the ginormousness of their lead-lined onions.
[deleted]
1 up, 1y
Possibly. Everyone's a big fish if you find a small enough pond.
Caption this Meme
