Police are also far more abusive than drag queens. Their track record shows it.

Child please! You are not that dumb.

If a child is lost I want that child to feel confident to march up to a cop and say “I am lost”. Now I do feel confident schools can safely vet drag queens to read to children

Wow! So this is our nation on leftism. Celebrate the child grooming freaks and disparage law and order police officers trying to make things safer for children.

The meme says to explain how drag queens reading to kids is grooming. I guess you’re incapable of that?

We’ve all been down this road before with you…you apparently are totally incapable of understanding.

it understands
it just doesn't care

The use of "it" in this comment is yucky

I'd hate to misgender it by assuming it is male or female

about all I can assume is it isn't plural so doesn't rate a "they"

Looks like you need to change your name to TriggeringLiberals. 😄

Singular them has existed for years, and if you really wanted to deny the existence of singular you could just use "he/she".

maybe because the cop is less likely to have a pre-existing child abuse charge in his past

Empirically false.

Nonsense.
Just because you utilize the word “empirically”, doesn’t make it so.

Google “police officers 40%”

LOL... Google... good one...

Always the response when you question their "strongly held lifelong beliefs" - "you can Google my opinion".

You can Google mine as well.

Oh, but you can't hurl insults at a google search result then flag it to make it disappear when it doesn't agree with you.
😄

I know empirically sounds impressive but it means you had to hang around millions of individual police officers over long, extended, periods of time and none of them touched you and repeated that same process with drag queens in order to use the word "empirically" when referencing your disagreement.

"Factually" or "statistically" would have been better choices - not that either would necessarily be true.

A teacher, or a google search, could have taught you that.

But that's what you can expect from a school system that spends more time trying to bring this stuff into the classroom instead of doing their one job - teaching abc123.

My comment was not to you. I hit the wrong reply button

Asking them to explain anything is a lost cause, I've tried over and over again and it never goes anywhere, it's just an endless loop of them saying something, you explaining why it's wrong, and them either just saying that they're right with no proof or just completely swapping out the point they're making.
They are just hopeless

The use of “them” in this comment is yucky.

Borderline heterophobic comments you are making. Careful you don't make anyone feel bad with your marginalizing sentiments.

Now, why is WRONG to oppose drag queens reading to children?

It’s also the content that the drags read, not just the clown show itself.

There is some inappropriate material from what i have heard.

The aren't reading them Clifford the Big Red Dog books

PRECISELY

“Heterophobic” you are aching to be victimized

Why would I ache to be victimized?

Am I like you, a triggered leftist?

I think you’re smart enough to know heterosexuals aren’t oppressed for their sexual identity. You’re just being stupid on purpose.

Heterosexuals are being oppressed for their sexual identity.

Their feelings, desires, ideologies, are no less valid than yours.

Your hare trigger has gotten the better of you.

Now you've crossed the line with your last remark.

😐Smh

ya trollin', no actual person believes that straight people are oppressed for any reason.
heterophobia does not exist anywhere outside of twitter idiots, and homophobia actually exists in governments and such.
stop being a crybaby.

Bigotry

So pointing out that hets are not oppressed in any way out of maybe some idiots being idiots is bigotry, got it.

You are rambling.

There is no defending your hate speech.

There is no way to justify your bigotry.

There no way to rationalize you phobia.

There is no reason to be afraid of the differences in people.

P.S. Again, "hets" is insulting to some.

So pointing out that hets are not oppressed in any way out of maybe some idiots being idiots is bigotry, got it.

Provide an example of hets being oppressed because they are straight.

you'd have to be a very special kind of fragile to be offended by that.

I think the same of you and your ilk but it is what it is. Bigotry is bigotry.

You’re just grasping for straws, meanwhile people are being killed just for displaying gay pride flags. F**king shame on you.

Shame on you for being the very thing you hate.

Shame on you for trying to make yourself the victim

Dang didn't know cop and straight were synonyms

You weren't referencing the policeman's sexuality, you were implying they are violent.

Shame on you for victim bigoted shaming.