Wanting women to be your own subjugated servants because a 2000 year old book said so is totally not a red flag at all.

Riiiiiight . . . and those cherry picked incidents taken out of context defines all conservatives. What's interesting is that apparently all leftists -- male and female -- advocate the grooming of children in public schools. Ironic, eh?

You know grooming actually used to mean something before it meant ‘teaching my child facts about the world that I don’t like.’

You mean like people once upon a time could be patriots without being called nationalists and equated to fascists? You mean when being White was not a leftist generated curse word designating EVIL?

Something like 20% of Generation-Z consider themselves one of the rainbow flag brigade because leftists teachers GROOMED them to believe that of themselves in public schools. Remember when a rainbow was an innocent thing before the political Left got their grubby ideological paws on it?

Almost as if that 20% always existed and providing them with a safe judgement free environment to be who they are made the numbers go up because it was something previous generations did not have.

Nah . . . it's deliberate conditioning. The Left learned well from their Marxist teachers of the former Soviet Union and current Communist China.

20+% of GenZers were/are reared by a single mother.

The research has proven the mental, emotional, physical, and economic difficulties the kids suffer due to this.

Enter leftist ideology and teachers dangling the carrot of parental surrogacy to easy marks.

Aye . . . Cultural Marxists are going to pounce and . . . groom the emotionally unstable or intellectually uncertain.

*cracks open bible*

Let's see.... says here rainbows are the eternal reminder of that time God murdered all but eight humans on Earth and then promised not to do it (the same way) again.

I'm sorry, what was it you were saying about rainbows being an "innocent thing"?

Cracks open an actual history text and learn that artists, poets, and writers have treated rainbows as symbols of hope for centuries BECAUSE -- according to religion -- it was created as a symbol of hope and -- depending on the religion -- Gods promise not to group cull humanity again. Thus was an innocent symbol of hope and purity for thousands of years . . . until leftists decided to utilize it to promote their Cultural Marxism.

That's a long way to go just to confirm the unlying allegorical causation of genocidal mass-murder and its commemoration. Artists, poets, and writers can treat things pretty much however they want under the blanket of poetic license -doesn't make it true/accurate. I mean... when one is writing fiction about fiction...

Speaking of which, there was no promise not cull humanity again, just a promise not to do so by drowning... apparently I was mistaken in assuming including the phrase "the same way" would serve as a research-inductive goad. Oh well -if you're going to engage on a topic, know the source material. And if you don't, well... you're currently experiencing the consequence. Huh... feels like we've been here before...

Oh, nope, that's just resonant backflow from the next bit --(re: individuals not understanding the words they use) you really should look up "Cultural Marxism" before deploying the term again... or, at the very least, don't capitalize "cultural".

Translation: Leftists hating on religion. Because THEIR religion is Cultural Marxism . . . or WOKISM or Political Correctness . . . so forth and so on.

In western civilization leftists focus their hatred on Christianity. The Islamic faith, Judaism, Buddhism, Taoism, Hinduism, et. al. . . . not so much, even though those religions definitely do not supported toxic Cultural Marxism. One supposes that what passes for leftists in the regions dominated by those separate religions, also despise their country's dominant religion. It's the leftist way.

So you're going with the Humpty-Dumpty method, then?

You really, really should have looked up "Cultural Marxism," CH...

When did I ever say that about men?

Did you miss that poll of liberal women complaining the only real men out there were conservatives?

I guarantee no one has ever said that, and it still has nothing to do with my point.

So you did miss it... figures...