POTUS VS RAPIST

Anyone can be indicted . . . there is a famous quote about a ham sandwich and typically corrupt (leftist) D.A.s owned by George Soros. Where the left falls apart in their political weaponization of the 'justice' system, however, is that after the bogus show trial starts, actual evidence that will hold up in a court of law and witnesses with viable information MUST be produced.

As for the rape lie . . . as of yet no leftist HOWLING about this has been able to produce the actual verdict and nor reveal the resulting sentencing and nor time that Trump spent behind bars for the conviction.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/07/19/trump-carroll-judge-rape/

Exactly what, is that helmet supposed to be protecting anyway ?

Ouch . . . and . . . brilliant!

Not really...🙄

Actually it is brilliant humor. One does not have to like the conclusion to appreciate that it was brilliant.

This is why every once in a while I actually up-vote a leftist memer and add a compliment. Of course such a meme is produced only on average of one out of a hundred terrible memes. But I do try to give credit where credit is due.

I suggest that everybody look at the meme before this one and it paints a completely different picture and it's frightening that these people making these comparisons just dismiss PedoPete's weird and creepy actions around kids.

Quotidian bullshit

The finding that Ms. Carroll failed to prove that she was ‘raped’ within the meaning of the New York Penal Law does not mean that she failed to prove that Mr. Trump ‘raped’ her as many people commonly understand the word ‘rape,’ ” Kaplan wrote.

He added: “Indeed, as the evidence at trial recounted below makes clear, the jury found that Mr. Trump in fact did exactly that.”

Kaplan said New York’s legal definition of “rape” is “far narrower” than the word is understood in “common modern parlance.”

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/07/19/trump-carroll-judge-rape/

...

Rapist?

To leftists the accusation IS the proof . . . unless, of course, it is real and hard evidence against any of the Bidens or Hillary or Obama . . . in which case there is no such thing as proof.

The finding that Ms. Carroll failed to prove that she was ‘raped’ within the meaning of the New York Penal Law does not mean that she failed to prove that Mr. Trump ‘raped’ her as many people commonly understand the word ‘rape,’ ” Kaplan wrote.

He added: “Indeed, as the evidence at trial recounted below makes clear, the jury found that Mr. Trump in fact did exactly that.”

Kaplan said New York’s legal definition of “rape” is “far narrower” than the word is understood in “common modern parlance.”

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/07/19/trump-carroll-judge-rape/

The finding that Ms. Carroll failed to prove that she was ‘raped’ within the meaning of the New York Penal Law does not mean that she failed to prove that Mr. Trump ‘raped’ her as many people commonly understand the word ‘rape,’ ” Kaplan wrote.

He added: “Indeed, as the evidence at trial recounted below makes clear, the jury found that Mr. Trump in fact did exactly that.”

Kaplan said New York’s legal definition of “rape” is “far narrower” than the word is understood in “common modern parlance.”

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/07/19/trump-carroll-judge-rape/

....

So he didn’t rape her. Thank you for admitting you lied and slandered the former president.

Yes... do show everyone the court proof stating Trump's conviction of rape... I know you can't... so you know what that makes you...

“The finding that Ms. Carroll failed to prove that she was ‘raped’ within the meaning of the New York Penal Law does not mean that she failed to prove that Mr. Trump ‘raped’ her as many people commonly understand the word ‘rape,’ ” Kaplan wrote.

He added: “Indeed, as the evidence at trial recounted below makes clear, the jury found that Mr. Trump in fact did exactly that.”

Kaplan said New York’s legal definition of “rape” is “far narrower” than the word is understood in “common modern parlance.”

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/07/19/trump-carroll-judge-rape/

Yes it does PROVE that Trump did not rape her . . . else the verdict would have been for . . . rape. Logic so convincing that even the average Dem Party voter should grasp it . . . but they won't. That, of course, says volumes about the intellectual state of the average Democrat . . . and totally explains why they knowingly voted for an obvious dementia patient for president. It's all so clear now!

The finding that Ms. Carroll failed to prove that she was ‘raped’ within the meaning of the New York Penal Law does not mean that she failed to prove that Mr. Trump ‘raped’ her as many people commonly understand the word ‘rape,’ ” Kaplan wrote.

He added: “Indeed, as the evidence at trial recounted below makes clear, the jury found that Mr. Trump in fact did exactly that.”

Kaplan said New York’s legal definition of “rape” is “far narrower” than the word is understood in “common modern parlance.”

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/07/19/trump-carroll-judge-rape/

...

Stop watching Fox-Rt

Translation: "The common modern parlance," of dedicated leftist Trump-haters. As we have seen the last few years. Leftists can change the definition of 'WOMEN' but genuine biologists still -- and correctly -- define 'woman' according to science rather than increasingly lunatic 'common modern parlance'.

He has done a great job following the adage that if you tell a lie often enough libs will come to believe it.

Absolutely.

LOL... so nothing from a court of law... I was right!