And the expense is a tax deduction against the income front the article.
[deleted]
1 up, 1y,
1 reply
Are you aware that you don't even particularly need a vulva to play with them? In fact, all you really need is the money that it costs. They won't deny the sale to people who aren't women.
1. Are you aware that I didn't participate in the research nor did I facilitate the leftist alteration of words? I am just trying to educate folks by bringing it to their attention.
2. Most reasonable people would not be defending the use of the term, "people with vulvas" instead of "women". Those offended by the word 'women', are often offending women in general, IMO.
3. No one said there were any sales denied to anyone. Vibrators are routinely used for sore muscles but you should be 'aware' (your word) that women would be the target group for the product.
4. If you are married, do you think your wife would want to be referred to as a 'person w/ a vulva' or any of the terms mentioned in the title? 🤔
[deleted]
1 up, 1y,
2 replies
But - your admission - these products ARE routinely used by people who might not be women at all?
It wasn't an admission, it was a statement of fact.
Jock straps would generally be marketed to males (although they might make decent slingshots)... so, your point is...?
[deleted]
1 up, 1y
... difficult to know what to do here. It wasn't an admission, it was just recognizing that it was true?
[deleted]
1 up, 1y
By the way, I absolutely would pay to read the New York Times' review of which jock strap makes the best slingshot. Anyone who says they wouldn't is lying.
Funny coincidence that you would show up, Modda, as I was thinking earlier how much you remind me of antithesis!
So, your deep thought on this one is to ignore the ignorance and it will go away? Not likely to happen. That is why when I see leftist/liberal lunacy, I expose and confront it.
[deleted]
1 up, 1y,
1 reply
Not really. It's a recently featured meme and we're both logged on at about the same time of the day. It's not much of a coincidence.
I also tend to follow certain memer's comments to see where the action is.
I haven't seen the front page/hot pages in months, they're 98% the same memes with 100% the same comments, so I seek more interesting fare,,,
btw, I, in no way, would even dare try to dissuade anyone from fulfilling their curiousity on matters such as vibrators. If that's what's important to them, then who am I to stand in their way?
[deleted]
1 up, 1y,
1 reply
Weren't they all supposed to have stopped reading NYT a long time ago?
New York Times Roasted for Massive
Article Reviewing Vibrators, Referring
to Women as ‘People with Vulvas’; At no point in an article re WOMEN's toys
did it use the word, “WOMAN”, BUT
“People with Vulvas” mentioned 6 times! The Winner! ______; ___________; It Spent “150 Hours of Research
and Testing” the Top 5 Vibrators
(Oh, there IS another word for that)
😜😆😉😂