He must figure, "Trump's poised to lose again. So, 'What's the harm?'"

I touched on this on another meme earlier, NPC's just can't fathom how someone can think for themselves and change their views. This person's only material is based on Jan. 6th, that's just obsessive but they'll never change their views because being right in spite of always being proven uninformed is better for their ego.

I post about what is in the news. People in the real world are talking about 1-6-21 and the upcoming elections. Your opinion of me is of no interest to me. If you have some facts that might enlighten us on the subject of Kevin McCarthy's U-Turn, please share them.

Larry, Larry, Larry... you're spot on about so many things, but dead wrong about so many others.

So, this is like when Nervous Nancy Pelosi said the president doesn't have the authority to wipe away student loan debt, right?

Nancy Pelosi and student debt have nothing to do with this meme. Create your own meme if you want to opine about them.

It's called drawing an analogy. And it was a good one. The fact that you want to bury your head in the sand and not compare statements from two Speakers regarding the POTUS from their own party makes it no less relevant.

I don't know of anyone who said there was no evidence of voter fraud. There were a number of individual cases. Many of them were committed by Republicans. But, in fact, Judge after Judge have ruled that widespread voter fraud did not happen. Trump's Attorney General agreed. Fox News lost a billion dollars over spreading voter fraud lies. "America's Mayor" Rudy Gailani sullied his own stellar reputation and lost his ability to practice law for spreading voter fraud lies.

"But, in fact, Judge after Judge have ruled that widespread voter fraud did not happen. "

Incorrect.

In most cases, those judges ruled that those bringing the lawsuits hadn't provided sufficient evidence for them to rule, or for the matter to be adjudicated. You have to learn to get your facts straight, Larry.

Besides, Larry, when did it become illegal to question elections? Dems have been doing it for years.

Speaking of which, Has Stacey Abrams yet conceded losing the 2018 race for Gov of GA? Nope. And there's plenty of evidence of her spreading "lies" about that election. Why isn't she up on charges?

Check this out: https://www.cnn.com/2021/12/03/politics/stacey-abrams-concession-2018-georgia/index.html

It states:

During an interview with CNN’s “New Day” on Friday, Abrams said Kemp “won under the rules of the game at the time, but the game was rigged against the voters of Georgia."

Sounds pretty similar to things Trump has said, hey Larry?

"News outlets, including Fox News and the Wall Street Journal, have reported that Trump and supporters of his campaign have been routinely defeated in court. 'Judges have denied or dismissed dozens of cases backed by Trump and his allies, who have pushed unsupported charges of widespread fraud in battleground states,' said a Jan. 7 Fox News report." --From a Jan 8, 2021 report in fact checker "Politifact."

That article continues: Judge Stephanos Bibas, a Trump appointee to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, said in dismissing one Pennsylvania challenge: "Free, fair elections are the lifeblood of our democracy. Charges of unfairness are serious. But calling an election unfair does not make it so. Charges require specific allegations and then proof. We have neither here."

Our ruling
Biden said that in more than 60 cases, judges "looked at the allegations that Trump was making and determined they were without any merit."

Biden’s figure is correct

I'll take Fox News and Politifact's endorsement of the essence of my statement over your nit-picky criticism.

Get back to me about comparisons of Abrams and Trump after she stages an event similar to the "Stop the Steal," attempted coup d' etat.

Lev Parnas, the Ukranian recruited by Rudy to say Joe Biden pressed for the dismissal of a Prosecutor for investigating the Burisma/Biden Bribery story, was on the news this morning. He sent a letter to MAGA-Republicans spearheading the Biden smear campaign in the House. As a witness to what really happened he says Biden had the Prosecutor fired for NOT investigating corruption.

It must be a hard thing to accept that Hunter Biden is a Recovering Addict. During the days when he was "using," he did bad things, like avoid paying his taxes. He has been fully investigated by a Special Prosecutor appointed by Trump's DOJ. That prosecutor allowed him to plead guilty to illegal possession of a gun and tax "evasion." If that prosecutor found any evidence to support the Burisma, Laptop or other conspiracy theories, he would have said so. Why would a conservative prosecutor risk 20-years in prison to cover up for the Punk-Kid of a liberal President. He wouldn't.

bla bla bla... keep ignoring the fact that the Bidens took a 10 Million dollar bribe from Burisma

And, your proof is what? The unsupported testimony of a guy under indictment for violating Iran Sanctions and accused of being an illegal agent of the Communist Chinese government? I will keep ignoring the falsehoods spread by anti-American extremists, until they produce facts to support them. For example, banks reported transactions over $2,500 to the Special Prosecutor. Nowhere did they report anything close to $10-million. Show me the money!

FBI... Grassley released it... Where were you?