When you said that we are in more danger from family friends than a drag queen, I found that in the US, child homicide rates have increased every year by an average of 4.3% during the last decade

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/may/18/child-custody-laws-domestic-violence-homicide-rising

Is that gang-related homicide, "children" til they're 19? So homicides from inner city "children" aged 11-19 counts?

Homicides of children 10 years or younger were most commonly precipitated by abuse/neglect, perpetrated by parents/caregivers.

Homicides of 11- to 17-year-olds were most commonly precipitated by crime and arguments and perpetrated by someone known to them, especially friends and acquaintances.

70.3% of child fatalities in FFY 2019 involved children younger than 3 years.

Therefore, most child deaths are children under 10 and are is commonly precipitated by family violence.

https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamapediatrics/article-abstract/2799356
https://www.childwelfare.gov/pubpdfs/fatality.pdf

"70.3% of child fatalities in FFY 2019 involved children younger than 3 years."

Vaccine injuries/death?

It's strange when people look up statistics, the cause and wording changes.

Example the other day someone was using the Google's top results about "gun violence", it then changed to "gun deaths" in the same paragraph. However in that same paragraph it never mentioned "crime prevention" or how gun ownership leads to less crime in general. It muddy the waters, adding suicide and accidents into "gun deaths" to try to add fear to gun ownership. Also added "gun deaths" when lawful citizens or police stopped a criminal/crime.

So when criminals get blasted it added that to the "Gun violence" and "gun deaths", as if to say that when someone uses a gun in defense of a violent criminal, that action is "gun violence"

The person that wrote up the statistic paragraph was very sloppy, BUT very clever in a way to make people fear gun ownership. Clever, but deceptive. Annoying when someone posts that type of gathered statistics talking points when I'm arguing with them. Not saying you are, just the wording changes reminds me of that.

Since when did the COVID-19 vaccine cause deaths towards children? There were more under 10 children who were killed by their parents (likely their dad) than a vaccine. And a mass shooter is more likely to kill a 11 year old than a drag queen and the vaccine combined.

Ever heard of SIDS? That's vaccine murders(by pharma and doctors).

Mass shooters are more often than not, gang related, drug related, inner city crime related

Vaccines currently prevent 3.5-5 million deaths every year from diseases like diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, influenza and measles. Yet there were 15 000 deaths globally in 2013 from SIDS.

https://www.who.int/health-topics/vaccines-and-immunization#tab=tab_1
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5683278/

"Vaccines currently prevent 3.5-5 million deaths every year from diseases like diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, influenza and measles." ---- No actual physiological evidence to back that statement up. Correlation is not causation.

And you have any better statistics?

Statistics can be manipulated.

Conservative statistics are manipulated by conservatives because they want money for their lies because there is no other way for them to become rich, so they have to make propaganda as a job.

And as to what we were talking about, the vaccine statistics I sent were not manipulated, your ones probable were.

"Yet there were 15 000 deaths globally in 2013 from SIDS." --- The one factor in all of SIDS deaths, is that the child was vaccinated just hours or a day, before their injury/death, where-as they were healthy beforehand.

False. Many clinicians and researchers believe that SIDS is associated with problems in the ability of the baby to arouse from sleep, to detect low levels of oxygen, or a buildup of carbon dioxide in the blood. When babies sleep face down, they may re-breathe exhaled carbon dioxide.

https://www.childrenshospital.org/conditions/sudden-infant-death-syndrome-sids

Proof those children weren't vaccinated? And the vaccine did no harm to cause the baby to die while they're sleeping?

Vaccines are safe, that's all you need to know. The unsafe vaccines don't get approved by the CDC

Wow!!!! You googled soemthing and I have no clue what talking point you are attempting to support because it the fact remains. People are in more danger from people they KNOW not starngers

Correct.

In 2019, 28.3% of homicide victims were killed by someone they knew other than family members, according to the FBI. Of those victims, 13% were slain by family members, and nearly 10% were killed by strangers.

https://www.newsnationnow.com/us-news/midwest/crime-involving-strangers/

Did not need the info I know I am correct. Americans are peeing themselves over the dumbest fear mongering bs because that is what they want less freedom

The Left has never done anything to protect children from "violence" either! Left-wing gun control is about disarming the taxpayers... It has nothing to do with promoting public safety or protecting children.

You made no point

As for disarming people? Even Trump wanted to take guns without due process. The fact you will ignore that or deny it is just funny

You do realize there's a ton of Americans that were against Trump being in favor of Red Flag Laws, and that's one of the largest biffs he made?

One of??? He "biffs" every time he opens his hole

Yes, one of the largest biffs, was his support for Red Flag Laws.

I'm sorry you can't handle that.

He did make a point, and you can't dispute it. "Gun Free Zones" didn't work out so well, did it?

How's the "Gun Free Zones" policies working out?

Since I think "gun free" zones are a joke I have no need to comment. ButI will say it is a total riot that people like you want everyone to believe having a "gun" is the end all answer.

Cops can not even protect themselves from actual criminals and somehow internet Rambos think they are they so damn brave and bad ass lol

Ironic. You want to ignore the cause of easy-targets, then deflect.

Then you proceed to want to double-down, thinking people having the ability to defend themselves, isn't a solution, to criminals. When in fact, Americans having guns, we can defend ourselves from criminals a lot easier. Making it more difficult for criminals to create more victims.

Then you bring up cops. Who's relying on cops? No one should rely on cops. Even the SCOTUS ruled that cops do not have to sacrifice their own life, to protect yours/ours.

When you have the ability to neutralize a criminal, it's not about bravery or bad-assery, it's about instinct and saving your own ass.

You think claws and teeth of a Lion, is any different than claws and teeth of another Lion?

I suggest you do answer my question: "How's the "Gun Free Zones" policies working out?" So that you can better understand.