You Are Who You Are, Not How You Feel

Turns out Trump actually isn't a real Orangenoid. It's makeup.

He never ceases to amaze, so much to offer,,,,

I don't belong to any cult, so tell me what I haven't figured out.

Never said you did. But... as you seem to have confirmed you're in the Trump camp, there's a strong possibility you might be. That's the insidious thing about cults -people who wind up in them usually can't tell that's what's happened.

Assuming you are, in fact, in the Trump camp, ask yourself: would a man the likes of which Trump claims to be, a man who's fighting for the little guy, a man of morals and honor try to force someone out of their home, off their property for personal gain?

SEE: Coking vs. C.R.D.A., Donald Trump, and Trump Plaza

In that case, replying to me with a meme insulting Trump supporters without knowing whether or not I'M one of them is not a very educated thing to do. And people who wind up in cults are invariably charmed into joining by someone claiming to have all of life's answers. Trump has been Trump since long before he became President, and I doubt anyone would use the word "charming" to describe him.

I already know the case. Trump didn't do what any other business hasn't done, or what our own government hasn't itself done a thousand times. So tell me, what haven't Trump supporters like me figured out?

The meme was aimed at Trump cultists -the denotation of which was clearly laid out in the text. Apparently what you, personally, haven't figured out is the difference between a Trump supporter and a Trump cultist.

So you know that Trump pulled strings at city hall to have Mrs. Coking's house and land taken from her after she refused to sell? You further know that his purpose for attempting to wrest Mrs. Coking's property from her was to raze the house and build a limousine parking lot? You're also aware that after he lost his bid to force her from her land he started a construction project building a protuberance stretching from his adjacent property out over her house? Additionally, you're aware that, in the middle of the night, when the jobsite was closed, her roof was set on fire? Moreover, you're aware that, although Trump was found liable for the costs incurred in fire and water damage, he never made restitution to Mrs. Coking? You know all of that about Donald J. Trump and you still support him? As you have stated you are fully aware of the details of the case, that Mrs. Coking could well have been incinerated in her home, indicated that is irrelevant to you, and you still give your allegiance to Trump, it is not unreasonable to now deduce that you're a Trump cultist.

"Trump didn't do what any other business hasn't done."

Could you name a business -any business- you know of which tried to take a woman's house and land and when that didn't work, the company built a cantilever from an adjacent structure over her property only to have a mysteriously, conveniently started fire occur which could well have burned the house down with her in it?

😆There is no such thing as a Trump cult and therefore, no such thing as a Trump cultist. That's left-wing stupidity attempting to insult people who disagree with you. Writing something as ludicrous as that while using all those big words to make such a stupid comment makes you look like a pretender.

"As you have stated you are fully aware of the details of the case"

If you were even modestly educated, there is no way you could misquote me the way you did. But you're so busy trying to impress yourself that you failed to make an accurate, intelligent reply because you failed to comprehend what I wrote. My comment in no way translates to knowing all that jibber jabber you wrote.

"Could you name a business -any business- you know of which tried to take a woman's house..."

Once again, you were so anxious to bang out your idea of a clever reply that you didn't comprehend what I wrote, so your reply is nothing but jibber jabber. Let me dumb it down a little for you. I wrote: "Trump didn't do what any other business hasn't done." That doesn't imply that some other business tried to take someone's home. What did Trump do? He used a legal maneuver, Imminent Domain, to accomplish a goal. That's nothing other businesses and even our government haven't done.

Just to make sure you know where I'm going with this, your meme is stupidly written, doesn't indicate you understood MY meme, and you're digressing from the topic, which isn't Trump (although you TDS victims want everything to be about him). It's about the fact that there is no such thing as trans. If you wrap an orange peel around an apple, that doesn't make it an orange. If you wrap a dress around a man, that doesn't make him a woman. Now, run along. You're jamming up the thread with nonsense.

That's the most words I've seen a TDS- addled Trump-cultist use yet to distract from the fact that Dear Leader (a man who flaunts his vengefulness) very possibly tried to burn a woman's house down with her in it.

For the record, I would never support a microcephaloid having access to nuclear weapons or the authority to order the US military deployed... of course that's one of the benefits of not being afflicted with TDS, neck deep in a cult.

"There is no such thing as a Trump cult and therefore, no such thing as a Trump cultist. That's left-wing stupidity attempting to insult people who disagree with you. Writing something as ludicrous as that while using all those big words to make such a stupid comment makes you look like a pretender."

They said as they demonstrated they don't know what makes a cult or cultist. You should have looked those words up before you started making declarations.

'As you have stated you are fully aware of the details of the case'

"If you were even modestly educated, there is no way you could misquote me the way you did. But you're so busy trying to impress yourself that you failed to make an accurate, intelligent reply because you failed to comprehend what I wrote. My comment in no way translates to knowing all that jibber jabber you wrote."

They said while demonstrating they can't tell the difference between a misquote and a summative paraphrase.

'Could you name a business -any business- you know of which tried to take a woman's house...'

"Once again, you were so anxious to bang out your idea of a clever reply that you didn't comprehend what I wrote, so your reply is nothing but jibber jabber. Let me dumb it down a little for you. I wrote: "Trump didn't do what any other business hasn't done." That doesn't imply that some other business tried to take someone's home. What did Trump do? He used a legal maneuver, Imminent Domain, to accomplish a goal. That's nothing other businesses and even our government haven't done."

They prattled while scrambling to avoid answering the question, attempting post hoc Humpty-Dumptyesque revision of the unambiguous, not-open-to-interpretation statement "Trump didn't do what any other business hasn't done." Had you included "vis-a-vis imminent domain" it'd be a different matter. But you didn't.

"Just to make sure you know where I'm going with this, your meme is stupidly written, doesn't indicate you understood MY meme, and you're digressing from the topic, which isn't Trump (although you TDS victims want everything to be about him). It's about the fact that there is no such thing as trans. If you wrap an orange peel around an apple, that doesn't make it an orange. If you wrap a dress around a man, that doesn't make him a woman. Now, run along. You're jamming up the thread with nonsense."

They said, indirectly admitting they're not smart enough to see how the comment meme plays on, connects to the content of their own.

When people decide to walk naked in the streets and stop shaving and cutting their hair and putting on makeup and perfume and whatever it is with the big cars and guns, you let me know,,,

I'm not making the connection. Can you elaborate?

AKA Dressing up at all in any way IS as something you're not.
Heck, dressing up at all IS the 'Original Sin' Christianity believes in, or at least the first indication of it.

You're conflating CULTURAL with BIBLICAL. And you'll have to show me where in Scripture it calls "dressing up" the "original sin." From what I've learned in my research of the Bible, Adam and Eve's eating of the fruit from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil was the original sin.

No, I'm not.
Chrisitianity has little to do with the Bible, and by that I DO NOT mean Saul/Paul anti-christisms.

▶️ "dressing up at all IS the 'Original Sin' Christianity believes in, or at least ⏩ the first indication of it ⏪"

"the first indication of it"

🙄🙂😀😃😆😂🤣 I can't argue with 🤪logic like that.

Wrong; the original sin wasn't the eating of the apple. Try again.

It wasn't an apple. So, what was it?

This oughta be good.

Someone as smart, educated as you've demonstrated you believe yourself to be doesn't need my help to figure out what is the real original sin. Here's a hint: logical progression. Think about it, it'll come to you... maybe.

Who you are as a person is on the inside, how you look is only superficial, you can be the most handsome or prettiest on the outside but its who you are on the inside is what counts, thats what matters. If you treat people like shit, disrepectful, dissmisive, with contempt, then youre ugly on the inside and doesnt matter how you look on the outside, you will be a repulsive person.

😆You're way off the mark. The "person you are" on the inside and outside goes to your CHARACTER, which is in your power to change. You can't change your gender. Wise up.

"The 'person you are' on the inside and outside goes to your CHARACTER, which is in your power to change."

So one's skin equates to their character? Interesting... and racist.

I told you to run along and not jam up the thread with stupidity. Now you get blocked.

Blocked?! Why? I mean... YOU did type "The 'person you are' on the inside and outside goes to your CHARACTER, which is in your power to change." Skin's on a person's outside -ergo one's skin equates to their character by your established maxim --I'm just playing by your rules.