Democrats still have not found a flaw in the Durham Report

Sure.

Can you point to one?

If you could, make sure to include the page number it comes from in the report.

Thanks.

IDU

I know you don't.

You were told that the Durham Report would be this bombshell thing. It was going to blow it all up.

And now it's come out, all the conservative outlets are going on about how it's super important and reveals all this deep state stuff.

But.

If you take a moment and listen to what they're saying, you'll find it's all generic. It's all...vague.

What accusations does he make in the report? Like specifically.

And he was a special prosecutor, why doesn't he take those accusations to court?

Because the point of a special prosecutor is to look for wrong-doing.

If he's "making accusations" why didn't he take them to court?

If you go and read the report (it's dull) what you'll find is that it's 300 pages and says that the FBI should have done an preliminary investigation before moving to a full investigation.

Not that they shouldn't have done a full investigation.

Just they shouldn't have skipped step one before going to step two.

Also, he explicitly says that the Clinton campaign did nothing wrong.

The IDU applied to your indecipherable comment, not the issue

Point an accusation in the Durham Report that you,
or any other brainwashed leftist, can refute; just one

The onus is upon you, put up or shut up

Sure. Gladly.

What accusations does he make?

Tell me like 2.

You can put it in your own words, but please do cite the specific pages from the report you're talking about so I can go and re-read it.

In case you don't have the report on hand: https://www.justice.gov/storage/durhamreport.pdf

Pretend you, as the accuser, don't have any obligation to back up what you say and somehow the onus is on me

do so by yourself to yourself

Okay. Sure.

And just so we're clear here: You don't know any accusations made in the Durham report.

You're super confident they're in there, but you're unable to articulate them. And you want me to refute these unarticulated accusations (that you're super confident are in there but don't know because you haven't actually read the report).

IN 300 pages Durham says that 1) the FBI should have done a preliminary investigation of the Steele Dossier before moving to a full investigation of the Trump campaign.

that's it. That's the 1 accusation Durham makes.

NOT that they should not have done a full investigation.

Just they should have done a preliminary.

Now.

On to refuting it with facts:

The Republican Attorney General Jeff Sessions ordered the FBI Inspector General to conduct a full review of the FBI's investigation.

You remember Jeff, right? The Trump appointed Attorney General.

Anyway.

The report found that the senior staff at the FBI extensively reviewed the available evidence and concluded it warranted moving to a full investigation, and there was not political bias in their decision.

A Trump Appointed Investigation found no political bias and that the move to the full investigation was warranted.

You can read that report here: https://www.justice.gov/storage/120919-examination.pdf

Lemme know if you ever get told some accusations that are in the report (I know you won't read it).

TLDR
TSDR

I know you didn't read it.

Just like you haven't read the Durham report.

You don't know anything. About the report. Or what's in it.

You only know what you've been told. By people who also know you won't read it. And they're paid to tell you what you want to believe is true.

Whether or not it actually is true.

TLDR
I don't feed trolls

But you asked for the engagement.

You said you hadn't heard anyone refute the accusations with facts.

I asked what accusations.

You said you didn't know what they were, and I'd have to find them.

I did. I refuted them with facts.

You continued on in your willful ignorance.

That's on you.

I don't feed trolls

[image deleted]

Yeah.

Because it's a 300 page opinion.

It lacks any facts.

TSDR

TSDV