Yes, I’m a Marxist-Leninist. No, I’m not a Nazi, please stop calling us that.

Yeah because the political ideology of mass murderers Stalin and Mao tse Tung and Pol Pot is sooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo . . . much better.

USSR=United-Soviet-SOCIALIST-Republic

So, if as AI chatbot "Collection of Cells That Makes Memes", states in this meme,
"Nazism stands for National Socialism"; and the CCCP was a Socialist Republic, (disolved in 1991) then can
a nation that in it's name labels itself a "nation of Socialists" equivocate directly with the "National Socialism" of the name Nazi?

Has Marxism-Leninism attempts at communism/socialism ever in history, evolved into Tyrannical Fascism? Maybe CharlesHobby1's Stalin and Mao tetse Tongue?

Is not this an issue with any current or future attempts at implementing this meager political ideology?

So, the meme admits Marxism-Leninism and Nazism IS THE EXACT SAME THING. Semantics

Fun fact: North Korea is officially called the DPRK, which stands for DEMOCRATIC People's Republic of Korea.

It’s ok, take your time.

I can call my cat a dog, but it still won't bark.

Same logic applies to calling Marxism-Leninism “Nazism”

Every U.S. president after WW2 is a war criminal.

The supposed death counts of Stalin and Mao is inflated, and Cambodia under Pol Pot was not socialist, just because it had “communist” in the name.

Stalin was not perfect by any means, I myself oppose to the deportations even as a Marxist-Leninist, but the way his death toll is counted is just plain ridiculous in so many aspects. They count people that died in gulags even though the majority of its prisoners were regular criminals, they also count people that died in the Holodomor even though Stalin had nothing to do with kulaks burning their crops and slaughtering their livestock, quote-unquote “reduced fertility” was counted as deaths by Stalin during the Soviet famine of 1946-1947 (which I shouldn’t even need to tell you was just fuсking ridiculous), and the Great Purge was a response to genuine threats of espionage, sabotage, and political subversion (such as the Case of the Anti-Soviet "Bloc of Rightists and Trotskyites”, where defendants literally admitted to murdering or plotting to murder revolutionaries).

Mao shouldn’t even have to be commented on, China was plagued with famine for basically all of its history. Saying that he was a mass-murdering tyrant is extremely disingenuous at best.

So essentially this amounts to 'Documented historical facts -- that is, those NOT collected by Marxists -- are ridiculous!' Nice!

Ok, do you have anything that can refute my claims? Because I believe I provided decent historical data.

The majority of people in gulags WERE regular criminals, the Holodmor famine WAS caused by kulaks burning their crops and slaughtering their livestock, it IS ridiculous to say that “reduced fertility” are deaths directly caused by Stalin, and the Great Purge WAS a response to genuine threats to the Revolution, such as with the case of the Anti-Soviet "Bloc of Rightists and Trotskyites”, where defendants literally admitted to murdering revolutionaries.

Traditional history books. Official facts and statistics rather than leftists revising history that they don't like.

Sorry bud, nothing seems to be popping up for me :|

History BOOKS as opposed to leftist sites dedicated to historical revisionism. Old fashioned history books. Who'd a thunk it, eh?

Oh you said BOOKS! My bad!

It’s hilarious how this is the only time a politics stream user cares about being discriminatory

And China WAS historically plagued with famine, one didn’t just suddenly happen under Mao.

Wow, even news outlets infested with bourgeois brainworms couldn’t confirm your claim. And trust me, that means a LOT.

I’d be more than happy to get a source from you.

Hey uh, CC-of-CTMM,
you talk and talk...
yet still, like the marxist-leninist you claim to be,
you still do not answer the three simple questions posed to you, as the 'fun fact' remains that you've taken your time. Could you maybe keep your focus long enough to address the 3 questions posed to you earlier. I'll simplify her for you, as that seems to be a necessity:

1- Can a nation that in it's name lables itself a "nation of socialists" equivocate directly with the "National Socialism" of the name Nazi, that you place forward?

2- Did Marxism-Leninism in its imperfect and flawed attempt at Communism/Socialism ever evolve into Tyranny and Fascism?

3-Is this not an issue with the WEF board of directors, and allegedly Diana Spencers' ex hubby, John Kerry, Al Gore, Yuval Noah Harari and Klaus Schwabs' current attempt at implementing this meager
political idealogy ?

Hello, UrbanDwellersAmnesiac!

I’d be more than happy to answer your questions, just surprised you didn’t put them out earlier.

1 - “National Socialism” doesn’t mean “nation of socialism”, it’s (supposedly) a combination of nationalism and socialism. Of course, the “socialism” part wasn’t real. In fact, the Nazis did everything in their power to distance themselves as much as they could from the actual meaning of the word. Members of the communist party were tracked down and imprisoned, the party itself was outlawed, communism was demonized through terms such as “judeo-bolshevism” or “Jewish Marxism”, trade unions were banned, and the term “privatization” was literally coined to describe Nazi Germany.

2 - No, it did not. And I’m assuming that you’re putting this out because you think I think that the USSR, Cuba, East Germany, the DPRK etc was not “real communism”. I’d like to say that I’ve never once heard a Marxist-Leninist ever say that, and trust me, I’ve been on the left for a long time. This is more of a social democrat/anarcho-communist talking point.

3 - The notion that the WEF promotes “Cultural Marxism” is basically a meme that only exists in the far-right. And the reasoning for this is that one of the people on the managing board went to a university named after Marx (at least that’s what I’m assuming your reasoning is, feel free to correct me if I’m being false), a university that was renamed and has otherwise no evidence of teaching anything Marxist, at least none that I’ve seen. Saying the WEF is socialist has to be one of the stupidest statements imaginable, it’s literally a lobbying tool for multinational corporations. Last time I checked, private corporations don’t benefit from private property being abolished.

If you say so, it must be so