News Bites That You Are Not Force Fed

I believe the point is there was not full disclosure contained in the risk management plan

A full disclosure to whom? To you? To your favorite YouTube "documentary" makers?

Everyone that read the literature.

If you read it you weren't given totally accurate/honest information.

I don't believe I have ever cited a you tube video or Wikipedia or Alex Jones, or any other famous "conspiracy" media personality.

I may have mentioned them from time to time for comedic purposes since this is supposed to be a humor site.

No full disclosure to everyone that read it?

If you're not even going to understand the question, what is the point?

You're just trying to be difficult.

Ridiculing and making inferences that I am stupid only illustrate that you have nothing of substance to say.

From my observation you add nothing to any discussion you inject yourself into.

For some reason you lack the ability to engage in rational conversation and are in full tilt boogie rage rant from the get go.

You're better than that. Lighten up.

ok. But no full disclosure to everyone that read it though? Nonsense.

Explain why you consider this nonsense, please.

How else do I say it? The document that spills the beans but doesn't tell the full truth at the same time... what part needs explaining?

How do you draw the incorrect inference that I disagree with the OP?

You talk much saying nothing

You changed the question without telling me.

Your initial statement was that every medication is required to have a risk management plan.

My comment was that I believe the OP is stating that the risk management plan for the medication named did not fully disclose

known adverse risks.

Then you started making snarky remarks and irrelevant comments about you tube documentaries.

So you believe the OP is wrong?

Then it DEFINITELY makes no sense to talk to me. Tell the OP!