yep

More like nope.
You should read your own meme before posting. I mean, this IS in it:

"THE MILANKOVITCH CYCLE REFERS TO THE COLLECTIVE EFFECTS OF CHANGES IN THE EARTH’S MOVEMENTS ON ITS CLIMATE OVER THOUSANDS OF YEARS."

"COLLECTIVE EFFECTS OF CHANGES... OVER THOUSANDS OF YEARS" is no El Nino or a Canadian jet stream stuck further south than normal for a season.

Fluctuations in Atmospheric and Oceanic patterns, sunspot activity, etc, should be looked into as causes of temporary changes in weather trends that some blow out of proportion into some grand climatic shift, not a cycle that regularly spans 27,000 years and causes the ebb and flow of ice ages.

That's the point. Takes place over THOUSANDS of years, not within a single or a few years.

Jungles on the Canadian Plain? What is this, 25,000,000 BC?

The Canadian Plains alternate between plains and glaciers.

Again, and I'm trying to help you here:

"Fluctuations in Atmospheric and Oceanic patterns, sunspot activity, etc, should be looked into as causes of temporary changes in weather trends that some blow out of proportion into some grand climatic shift, not a cycle that regularly spans 27,000 years and causes the ebb and flow of ice ages."

You're on the wrong track. You're not going to debunk a bogus theory with a bogus theory of your own.

WHERE*

oh, the irony,,,

And, no. You need to look things up first.

PS: Can you stop cramming my notifs with your nonsense?

Really? The sunspot theory being the actual cause of so-called Global Farting was?

So you're saying Al Gore is right?

Why do you believe Al Gore for tho? You see an ice-free Artic over by them Canadian plains' jungle?

256, is it, now? is not a short chunk of time in geological terms.

And you're repeating what you already erroneously applied.

Seriously now, can you show me where what I said had anything to do with the utterly unrelated nonsense you're posting, or is this just you followng that St Petersburg script?
Try to keep it to one reply.

No, it doesn't.

You keep repeating what you already erroneously applied.

Rigged? Like an election?
Try "Fudged" the data, or basically distorted it.

Have you not read a single comment I said?

No, it still wasn't still no matter how many times you say it still.

You keep replying directly to yourself, you don't even know how that works.
You don't even know how to make your point, instead just keep repeating one single sentence over and over for days.

You're not helping your position by posting mantras redundantly. You're not even aware that you're trying to argue against me by repeatedly agreeing with me.

Perhaps you should leave the subject to those of us who are better informed.