Imgflip Logo Icon

As long as a science illiterate judge leaves the FDA processes in place, we're good.

As long as a science illiterate judge leaves the FDA processes in place, we're good. | THE SAME M-RNA TECHNOLOGY THAT HELPED CORRAL COVID IS PREVENTING CANCER RELAPSES. A 44% PREVENTION OF SKIN CANCERS IS GOOD NEWS FOR PATENTS, BAD NEWS FOR ANTI-VAXXERS. LUNG CANCER IS NEXT, THEN THEY ARE ALL FAIR GAME. | image tagged in politics | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
269 views 4 upvotes Made by LarryCaird 2 years ago in politics
18 Comments
2 ups, 2y,
2 replies
made w/ Imgflip meme maker
4 ups, 2y,
2 replies
None of these illnesses is directly related to vaccination. Most of them ae attributable to better and more available diagnostic techniques. We used to call "Sleep Apnea," extreme snoring. Bi-Polar Disease and Depression we called Dementia Praecox. When a treatment is developed the number of officially diagnosed cases tend to increase. Celiac Disease used to be lumped in with various abdominal diseases until it was established as a unique diagnosis about 30-years ago.

Also, we are living longer, giving diseases longer to manifest.
1 up, 2y
The increase in those diseases directly correlates to Ronald Reagan no longer being president. Checkmate liberal!
2 ups, 2y,
1 reply
"Official numbers published by the Office for National Statistics (ONS), a government-run institution in the United Kingdom, show that by the time June 1, 2022, arrived, one in every 73 people in England who got “vaccinated” for the Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) had perished – this compared to just one in every 172 unvaccinated Brits."
4 ups, 2y,
2 replies
Fact-checking at the AP

"But the analysis on which Stirling bases this estimate misrepresents data published by the U.K.’s Office for National Statistics. The data shows deaths in England broken down by each person’s COVID-19 vaccination status and age. However, the data does not claim that a COVID-19 vaccine caused their death — it simply says whether or not they were vaccinated.

There are multiple other reasons Stirling’s findings are faulty, experts told The Associated Press.

Sarah Caul, head of mortality analysis at ONS, explained that while the data does track mortality rates based on vaccination status, there are more variables at play which may contribute to a loss of life.

“Other important differences between vaccinated and unvaccinated populations may remain, which can affect the mortality rates, particularly where more clinically vulnerable people have been prioritised for vaccination or where the number of people with a particular vaccination status is small,” she wrote in an email. “When most of the population is vaccinated, most deaths are in vaccinated people. Sadly, people die all the time, of all causes, regardless of vaccination status.”
1 up, 2y,
1 reply
"Yet, the data has a way of piling up, even if many in science, media, and government have avoided acknowledging its implications: By October of last year there had been at least 1,250 studies published in medical journals documenting events as disparate as Bell’s palsy, multiple sclerosis, central venous thrombosis, encephalitis, inflammatory bowel disease, myocarditis, etc. after vaccination."
1 up, 2y,
1 reply
You gave that bold statement in quotes. So, there must be a source?
1 up, 2y,
1 reply
"Dr. Ah Kahn Syed has written a stunning article on Substack which claims that two well-known scientists working for the NIH and Big Pharma actually got a research article removed from publication because it showed a link between the mRNA vaccines and breast cancer as well as ovarian cancer.

So let’s repeat the heart of this scandal: Eric Freed of the NIH (an agency which apparently owns patents to Moderna products) allegedly suppressed a very important paper showing that the mRNA vaccines were carcinogenic.

So concerned researchers and scientists filed a FOI for Eric Freed’s emails. And guess what? The NIH has the emails, but is refusing to release them."
1 up, 2y,
2 replies
Who is he? What are his credentials? Who funds his research? What legitimate medical journals have published his "peer-reviewed," findings? Is he a real human being? I cannot find this information. He appears to be fabricated to lend a name to conspiracy theory pseudo-science.
0 ups, 2y
When AV uses quotation marks, the material cannot be found.
When he posts detailed info atypical of his style without them, they turn out to be copypastes.
1 up, 2y,
2 replies
Yes Larry... the Biden regime is working hard to hide the truth...
1 up, 2y,
1 reply
Or, your guy is made up to fool people who have such low esteem that they will believe anyone or anything that is "anti-establishment."
1 up, 2y
Yes... Having your publications removed isn't censorship... LOL
1 up, 2y,
1 reply
This guy is a flim-flam man that makes Dr. Mercola look like an angel. His host site for all his garbage is "Substack," a money sucking platform designed to make grifting easy. What a joke. You guys will give money to anyone. I feel so sorry for you that I am going to stop arguing with you.
2 ups, 2y,
1 reply
Sorry Larry... they are hiding the data by over-classifying deaths caused Covid... thus showing lower numbers for other causes...
1 up, 2y
Be careful about revealing conspiracies. Someone might force an injection on you and make you lose your mind! I worked in health care administration, management and public affairs for 35-years. Health care professionals do not take part in political conspiracies, as a rule. They are very independent folk, with their own accrediting organizations monitoring them. The system has too many checks and balances. There is competition over discoveries and advances encouraged by over 100-universities in the USA alone. These discoveries are used in marketing to donors. Money is king in that system. Grant money is denied for life and pulled from people who falsify data. I could go on, but your mind is closed by virtue of being a MAGA-bot, and most logical people already got my point or stopped reading long ago.
2 ups, 2y
assuming those numbers are even correct, how do you tell the difference between more people having those diseases versus doctors being able to better diagnose those diseases?
Created with the Imgflip Meme Generator
IMAGE DESCRIPTION:
THE SAME M-RNA TECHNOLOGY THAT HELPED CORRAL COVID IS PREVENTING CANCER RELAPSES. A 44% PREVENTION OF SKIN CANCERS IS GOOD NEWS FOR PATENTS, BAD NEWS FOR ANTI-VAXXERS. LUNG CANCER IS NEXT, THEN THEY ARE ALL FAIR GAME.