Justice Thomas

Do you not know the difference between ethical and legal?

Because if you think it's okay that Thomas accepted millions in terms of vacations, jet travel, gifts, and straight cash with the sale of his mother's house (and she still lives in) and Crow is still paying property taxes on then you don't understand ethical behavior.

Because (5 U.S.C. § 7353) is the law regarding gifts to federal employees, including the Judicial branch. Interestingly, they're supposed to report these kinds of things. Everyone except members of the Supreme Court.

Given that every other kind of Judge would have to report this kind of thing, you think it's okay that Thomas didn't? Even though he's not legally required to do so?

You think that's ethical?

If your answer is "Yes" then you need to go back through all of your memes and comments to look for the phrase "George Soros Funded." and delete them.

Because you're very okay with politicians being on the payroll of billionaires (Harlan Crow has been paying Thomas for decades).

Interestingly, Harlan Crow has had 8 different cases come before the Supreme Court since he started paying Thomas with vacations, jet travel, etc. Want to guess which side Thomas came down on in those cases?

(Hint: All 8 he decided in favor of Crow)

So, if you're not going to delete those, then admit that you're a hypocrite and keep on doing what you do.

It's a simple question... What laws did he break?

I've literally given you the answer in the comment you have replied to.

But it's clear you don't understand the difference between legal behavior and ethical behavior.

It's a simple question: do you know the difference between ethical and legal?

I've asked him that exact same question before and he can't answer it

So you don't know the difference between legal and ethical.

Got it.

So you can't answer... got it...

Why are you deleting your comments? That's what a hypocrite does, according to you

He does this every time he gets owned. He deletes the comments, then will commonly go back and re-post the 1st one.

I did. I even gave the specific law.

Sorry... the ethics rules at the time did not require disclosure. Look it up...

What law did Michael Byrd break?

It's a simple question: do you know the difference between legal and ethical?

Because I quoted the exact law and how the Supreme Court is specifically exempt from it.

I can't help it you didn't read it.

So, I'll repeat it again: do you know the difference between legal and ethical?

With all the silence and lack of memes on the unethical behavior of clinton’s, pelosi’s, and bidens, their hypocrisy is on full display

Having trouble with comprehension I see, lets try and help you here. If you look at the WHOLE sentence you will notice I started with the word "No" that is in responce to the corrosponding sentence "...no laws broken...". As in maybe no laws broke, maybe so, I don't rightly know, however TRUST in the institution has been broken, along with those other tough words for you. Basically hes owned by a super rich republican who collects nazi memorobilia.

Yes... more innuendo and no facts... got it...

Your evasiveness on this thread is consistant, and your denial of accountability on the integrity of the supreme court. However youll probably continue to attack Bragg with no evidence of payments from Soros and display your hypocrisy in full view.

btw... the ethics rules at the time did not require disclosure. oops

Owning the Libs is a Trash Tier political ideology.