Tucker Carlson's Jan 6 coverage

The second one

Why feed the animals like Tucker when we can release all the footage? There’s nothing to see except an insurrection.

What happened to all that Jan 6th coverage?

If it was all lies and misinformation, shouldn't he be putting out more videos showing the truth?

I mean, all those hours, you'd think they're be tons and tons of it.

Has he produced anything else?

1 selectively edited video is not enough.

Tucker is a liar. His own emails have shown this to be true. He didn't believe the election was stolen yet he continued to promote it on his show.

In court, under oath, he has said that he is not a journalist and everything he says should be viewed with scepticism.

He has told us to not take what he say seriously AND proven it with his actions and emails.

Let's say DoJ convicted someone using a 1 minute edit video but Tucker produces shows 5 minutes of the same event from different cameras that show context to show what really happened.

And did it several times.

Or if he'd taken a moment we've all seen of people kicking in doors or smashing windows to get in or when the cops were beaten and said "now watch what was happening in the 10 minutes before that, and you'll see..." And showed us in unedited context what happened.

Then I would say there needs to be an investigation.

But he didn't do anything like that.

He produced 1 edited video of clips to support his narration.

"1 selectively edited video is not enough."

Of course it is. He proved that the government was hiding evidence; it doesn't matter how much.

You seem to be arguing that everything TC says is a lie; manifestly untrue; he was right about the government hiding evidence (how ever little or much) from the law. period. hard stop.

Your hatred seems to be robbing you of your objectivity

That video is evidence of Tucker's claim that he isn't a journalist and everything he says should be viewed with a great deal of skepticism.

The funny thing is you don’t believe Everything journalists say should be viewed with skepticism. What they can prove with facts is different, but in lefty world it is true if it’s from your partisan preferred media says it.

“1 selectively edited video is not enough.”

But it was for the Jan 6 committee?

I know you didn't watch any of the 10 hearings or any of the witness testimony they brought forward.

I know this because you begin with conclusions and only accept information that supports that beginning conclusion. Usually, this conclusion you form at the beginning is absent of any factual data and based solely on your emotional responses.

I know by your response that you would have been a huge supporter of the kangaroo courts of the Spanish Inquisition. Even they allowed some defense to be expressed. I also notice in the Republican commissions currently conducting investigations, democrats provide their contrary opinion on events. One sided testimony without cross examination supporting a pre decided conclusion isn’t aligned with American jurisprudence.