They still haven't met the burden of proof for their Covid intervention...

FYI: ignore, is the root word for ignorant

...if all one has is to respond with is stating "ignore & ignoring",
that just might be an ignorance indicator.

Keep in mind that the antithesis of credentials, is ignorance.

1. There was a pandemic
2. Nobody has verified any claim of vaccine injury as yet
3. Vaccinated populations stopped dying from the pandemic.

Done.

Nope... try again... I want documented proof... like clinical trials...

There's been lots of those but you ignored them.

And yet, they have done nothing to prove they have attained it with respect to the three essential, aforementioned points.

There's been lots of those but you ignored them.

Here is what you are ignoring about the vaccine: it is …
UNNECESSARY - UNSAFE- INEFFECTIVE

There are now 16 studies showing effectiveness of Ivermectin. Fauci/NIH/CDC/WHO all ignored Ivermectin from the get go.

https://www.uncoverdc.com/2023/02/10/gold-standard-rct-from-gates-funded-company-proves-ivermectin-works-against-covid/

Nope... you still haven't produced any proof to the contrary...

Me personally? No, clinical research teams from all over the world have. You've just been ignoring them.

Sorry... they didn't complete any... and you still haven't offered any proof...

Come back when you have some that cover all 3 points...

OK. They did though. You just keep ignoring them.

They weren't in the journals that YOU read, but as we've established many times, the journals YOU read are hot garbage.

Lots of things... LOL... yet you can't point to anything verifiable...

I've pointed to verifiable things to you many times in the past. I don't know how many chances you're expecting me to give you, but we passed that a long time ago.

Yup... you got more nothing... thanks...

Oh no, don't misunderstand me. There's LOTS more things I could give you to ignore.

But you'll just ignore them. Like you did with the studies that you've already been told about.

And Fauci, et al, not only ignored, but MISLED about natural immunity.

And Fauci, et al, ignored pre-covid studies that showed masks were ineffective at preventing aerosol viral transmission. Also ignored was doctors effectively treating patients early with HCQ, Ivermectin, Vit D, zinc and antibiotic. And Fauci, et al, further ignored fact that infection fatality rate of under 18yrs is virtually zero.

Bullcrap.

So you're denying that there was a pandemic?

I believe there was a pandemic of frightened gullibility.

Figthened gullibility doesn't cause 7 million people do die from lack of oxygen, organ failure, fever, and diahhrea.

Remdesivir does

Yet you also 'believe' this:

▶️ "RunawayTrain

And Fauci, et al, not only ignored, but MISLED about natural immunity."

▶️ "RunawayTrain

And Fauci, et al, ignored pre-covid studies that showed masks were ineffective at preventing aerosol viral transmission. Also ignored was doctors effectively treating patients early with HCQ, Ivermectin, Vit D, zinc and antibiotic. And Fauci, et al, further ignored fact that infection fatality rate of under 18yrs is virtually zero."

⏺️ Everything BUT the vaccne works.... for a disease that does not exist.

Can't you at least pick one false narrative and stick with it?
Consistency is the key to proper propaganda dissemination.

Nice try.. You have the only false narrative.
I did not say the virus does not exist.

Correct, what you said is:

▶️ "RunawayTrain

I believe there was a pandemic of frightened gullibility."

Only a fool blindly believes everything the government tells us. Question authority.

https://citizenfreepress.com/breaking/rand-paul-holds-court-in-wuhan-hearing/

▶️ "RunawayTrain0 ups, <1h
Only a fool blindly believes everything the government tells us. Question authority.

https://citizenfreepress.com/breaking/rand-paul-holds-court-in-wuhan-hearing/"

Question authority, let's hear what Rand Paul has to tell us!

What next, a Sex Pistols song with lyrics by McClaren?

Rand Paul is trying to get information to light that is not being told to us.

Would you like me to repost YOUR own words yet again for the nth time?

That's Rand, right, NOT Ron, the fella who the GOPers literally openly laughed at and called crazy until he retired then Jr comes along and he's the greatest thing evuh because he's picking up Daddy's torch, THAT Rand Paul?

Friggin pencil necked twerp backpedals faster than a circus monkey jacked up on crack if someone whispers "boo!" in his dumbass Dumbo ears. Ugh, his father's son? Ron should get on Maury and disown the little simpering sellout of a sniveling shit.

One helluva buttcrack licker tho, I'll give you that. He'll beat any roll of two-play any ol' day.

Yeah from misinformation

This 2005 ( yes- 2005- fourteen years before covid 19) study is not misinformation.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1232869/

It's a different Coronavirus altogether but nice try

COVID-19's actual name is SARS-CoV-2 virus

86.85% same DNA. Same spike protein. Same ACE2 receptor.
Bullcrap! But NICE TRY!

"At the genome level, SARS-CoV-2 is 96.75% similar to a bat CoV, known as RaTG13, but its nearest human CoV relative is SARS-CoV at just 86.85% similar"

COVID-19 maybe be 86.85% similar to SARS, but it is more similar to RaTG13 aka bat CoV.

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40142-020-00197-5

Data source: imgflip.com/i/7b1uko

Side bar:

Overall, the symptoms of COVID-19 and SARS are similar. But there are some subtle differences.

The symptoms of COVID-19 that SARS don't have include...

fatigue
diarrhea (but more of it)
runny or stuffy nose
sore throat
nausea
loss of taste
loss of smell

That's for starters.

About 20% of COVID patients would have needed to be hospitalised, whereas with SARS, about 20-30% of SARS patients would have needed mechanical ventilation.

COVID-19's transmission is easier than SARS.

https://www.healthline.com/health/coronavirus-vs-sars