I never denied the possibility of behavioral differences, the known anatomic differences between H. sapiens and H. neanderthalensis, -nor did I idolize H. neanderthalensis; I made a straight-forward statement about one of the few things reasonably inferrable from their remains and you lost your shit. You may deny it, but it's all right there in your in posts.
"No, I get frustrated when people take speculation as facts."
Funny how that's what you've been doing this whole time. All your cited sources show that the attributed behaviors they discuss are speculative, based on measurements of skulls which can't provide any proper data on the neural constructs, density thereof once contained within. I've repeatedly challenged you prove your assertions about H. Neanderthalensis behavior, you've repeatedly pointed to sources which don't.
And before you try to break smart-ass, keep in mind I said "evidence INDICATES they were wicked smart" not that they were, in fact, wicked smart. As previously iterated, I made a straight-forward statement about one of the few things reasonably inferrable from their remains and you lost your shit. I'm actually done this time -you win; no matter how much I try to get you to think analytically, get you to figure out that social behavioral traits can't be deduced from bones and that any claims made along those lines are speculation, you keep doing the very thing you just complained about. Have the last word, don't care. I'm going to take the advice proffered the moment you resumed your idiotic, spammy bullshit and put you on the blocked list.