Liberal Science

Yes... libs can't tell the difference between science and $cience...

Very good !

'Liberal' scientists. As if there was another kind or that that even impacted science.

+1

I love American politics. I'm not American. I just like the memes about them.

If a "scientist" is needed for you to distinguish the two genders of a biological human...you definitely are not conservative and you're the pot calling the kettle black.

Lol...I know right, just like everything else that has to be complicated in order to satisfy and justify leftist ideological fantasy.

Lol...uh-huh, that's why we're consistently seeing conflicted debate around it between two opposing ideological entities. One uses science and one uses religion, when all you have to do is use your own two eyes.
But, each to thier own, I'll rely on my eyes while you denounce religion and rely on science and your opposition will denounce science and rely on religion.

So Octavia buddy. Here we meet again. To answer your questions at your level it is all about 3 very different and unique things, a person's reality, accepted reality and third is truth. Let me explain and I will need you to answer 2 questions from the following scenarios I will give you. I need your cooperation to answer them.
First, a person's reality is different from person to person, not everyone is like you, some people only like having sex with someone of the opposite sex while some others do not and some others find it disgusting. Some people do not like having sex with animals, while some do. Some people believe that gender and sex are synonyms and used to describe each other since that is how it has been used since the beginning of humanity.
-Is it okay to judge people because they have different personal realities than your personal reality?
Second, accepted reality, this what the majority accepted as a reality.
-First scenario, you have 2 people arguing one is stating that there is a cow in front of them while the other states that there is a horse. A crowd appears and now there are 10 people agreeing that that is a horse not a cow and still have the one individual claiming is a cow. Who is right in this scenario? is it the man claiming there is a cow or the 10 people claiming is a horse?
-Second scenario, you have a tribe of cannibals in their accepted reality it is perfectly fine to kill and eat other people. Is it right for you to go out to the tribe of cannibals and tell them what they are doing is wrong? Would you get out of your comfort zone to tell them that what they are doing is wrong?
Please choose your answers carefully.

Very vague answers, with the exception of telling the cannibals if what they are doing is wrong. With that one, you've given me a "Yes" and this one does align with your behavior. "I am not sure" is not a yes and no answer, just too vague. "It depends on what is actually in front of them" is irrelevant, context here is personal truth against accepted truth, you did not gave me a yes or no answer you gave me a vague out of context answer does not matter what is in front. "Sometimes, yes. It depends on the specific situation" so you are admitting that depending on the situation is okay to judge others because of their personal reality does not align with yours, and aint that the very same thing you have been very intentional of accusing Christians of doing? So, by that answer, Christians are entitled to judge people who's reality is different or any group for that matter. Huh, you are not much different than Christians after all.

Did I say you were wrong? That is your assumption. You did not answer that question for me. I will return you the favor by not answering it for you either (even thou I already did in the previous post). I just wanted to illustrate to you that you are out of place and you belong to PoliticsTOO. People here have a different reality and accepted reality than yours, yet you tyranically come here to argue their reality is wrong (by who's authority you do that? Who made you better that them?), which I repeat, you hate Christians doing it to you, yet here you are doing the very same. "That doesn't mean my efforts are futile, because most people can change their views". Humor me, how is that working for you?

Again. I used those questions to answer you questions you been asking Memcorio. You see, in Politics channel, you are the man saying there is a cow while the large majority says it is a horse. For that very reason PoliticsTOO was made, for people who shared your reality. But you will tell cannibals that what they are doing is wrong, this is true and I agree with your answer because you come here to argue conservatives (illustrated as cannibals) and you would go out of your confort zone to argue with them. So, that should have also been an easy yes answer from you. Conclusion, you have personal and accepted realities clashing of what sex and gender is. Again, realities are NOT truth. You need to understand that here people have a different personal and accepted reality as you. Your efforts here are futile, you belong in PoliticsTOO.

Science is used for deception and evil, yup...do you need science to help determine that as well?
Don't need to see chromosomes, gamete and hormones to distinguish a male from a female.
It's actually quite straightforward, no complexities involved.
Anyways aside from all that, things seem to be moving in your direction towards transhumanism. Won't be long before you won't have a individual identity, science will deliver that for you as well...lol

"Chromosomes, gametes, or hormones", you mean those things that ACTUALLY determine if you are a biological Male or Female?

Why aren't there many conservative scientists?

Being a scientist requires a college degree

There are plenty, just none that want to be associated with a current administration that equates fantasy to actual science. That would tarnish ones credibility significantly.

And critical thinking skills