Imgflip Logo Icon

Sir this is a wendys

Sir this is a wendys | AT-ATs are heavily armored mobile artillery meant
for attacking surface installations, not for
engaging ground troups or fighters. Just like tanks,
they are vulnerable to surgical strikes
from more maneuverable forces and
should generally be accompanied by infantry or
air support in a full-scale attack. Still, even
without that, they inflicted heavy casualties
while suffering minimal losses,
have a wide damage cone, and easily
fulfilled their mission of destroying
the rebel shield generators. | image tagged in sir this is a wendys,star wars,the empire strikes back | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
17,057 views 333 upvotes Made by JoelCroteau 2 years ago in fun
Sir this is a wendys memeCaption this Meme
25 Comments
3 ups, 2y
AT-AT | man I hate living in Detroit on goddddddddd | image tagged in at-at | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
2 ups, 2y
AT AT | DAMN IT, I HATE WHEN THIS HAPPENS | image tagged in at at | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
1 up, 2y
best meme ever
1 up, 2y
"I didn't ask if this was a wendy's"
1 up, 2y
Pov: me when I'm 60
1 up, 2y
This is an army who just airman should be called
1 up, 2y
Me not reading the whole thing but upvote's it anyways.
[deleted]
1 up, 2y
1 up, 2y
From when the star wars meme became so popular, i see 2 in the first page
1 up, 2y
I relogged in just to upvote this thing. Good Job man. Spread the truth
1 up, 2y
The fact I read all of this makes it funnier
1 up, 2y,
1 reply
You should post this in the Star Wars Stream, that is, if there IS one.
0 ups, 2y
There isn't one.
0 ups, 1y
0 ups, 2y,
1 reply
but while the AT-ATs signature animal-like shape and walking movement make it strong, it also makes it weak due to the fact that if one of the legs is unstable, the whole AT-AT falls.
0 ups, 2y,
1 reply
The only AT-AT we see fall was due to a coordinated tripping by speeders armed with long tow cables. How many enemies are going to bring tow cables like that into a battle? They actually seem quite stable and work very well over rough terrain, like say if you're attacking a remote base on an almost totally uninhabited planet. Anything with wheels would be useless in that environment.
0 ups, 2y,
1 reply
nice. but a thermal charge to a nessisary joint could be destructive and people have those on them and since the AT-AT takes a long time between a singal leg making it a good stratigy
0 ups, 2y
You can do the same thing to tank treads. That's why you generally don't send heavy armor into battle without infantry to defend it from stock bombs and the like.
0 ups, 1y
0 ups, 2y
The problem isn't that the AT-AT's were susceptible to air strikes. Their armor was far too thick for the T-47 Airspeeders' blasters to penetrate. However, because of their long legs, tripping would be a hazard, as demonstrated by the fact that they were essentially taken out with tow cables. Meanwhile, the AT-TE had a better range, and was much closer to the ground. I don't remember their armor situation, but they were actually very good in combat.
[deleted]
0 ups, 2y
0 ups, 2y,
1 reply
0 ups, 2y,
1 reply
Same
Sir this is a wendys memeCaption this Meme
Created with the Imgflip Meme Generator
IMAGE DESCRIPTION:
AT-ATs are heavily armored mobile artillery meant for attacking surface installations, not for engaging ground troups or fighters. Just like tanks, they are vulnerable to surgical strikes from more maneuverable forces and should generally be accompanied by infantry or air support in a full-scale attack. Still, even without that, they inflicted heavy casualties while suffering minimal losses, have a wide damage cone, and easily fulfilled their mission of destroying the rebel shield generators.