It just doesn't.

You're absolutely right, Reaper. You hit the nail right smack-dab on the head, and with a literal sledgehammer, mind you!

I don't laugh at this meme - not even close; I actually agree with it wholeheartedly.

Damn. xD

What? I'm being honest! Besides, I horribly stink at lying.

My guilty conscience won't let me see the light of day until I confess! xD

I believe you!

I'm sorry, my bad - I just get really intensely emphatic when I agree with something or someone.

Please try to be a bit more respectful on this stream, you could have said this without as much aggression to someone who was just agreeing with the point made in the image.

If another mod sees this because of a repeated flag, this comment does not seem to be made with homophobic intent, which is why I left it with a warning

I am not a homophobe. Am just saying that feeling overjoy over something obvious seems pretty ridiculous.

It wasn’t a respectful comment, which is why you got a warning. I don’t see anyone saying you are a homophobe, so I am not sure why you brought that up.

In your previous comment you mentioned something about homophobia.

Read it again

Ok

Petty insults!!!
Wooo!!! Maturity!!

You did not needed to describe yourself

Did not needed
Damn you’re good at grammar too-

Also I love you basically just said “no u”
Lmao 🤓

"Did not needed
Damn you’re good at grammar too-"

How is that bad grammar?

"Also I love you basically just said “no u”
Lmao 🤓"

Also i lovw how you say "Petty insults!! Wooo!!! Maturity!!-🤓🤓🤓"

The donkey that responded

And raiden said it

Yeah.

It would also be funny if senator Armstrong (real name Steven) also said it xD

LOL

Yer right about that mate

But nobody asked

Like guns

That's a different story. xD

Same people who decided that

Nope

Granted. xD

Lies. Guns are fine so long as they are under responsible usage.

So, to avoid getting in the wrong hands, the must not be to sale to the general public

Many people in the general public are responsible enough to have them. The problem is not the people but who gets them. Which is why we need liscensing.

And to avoid that, the selling of guns should be lowered

Nope. Gun sales are allowed. But people need liscences to buy them. So your wrong.

But even if they have a license, they could use it for bad. There should be a psychological test to see if they are in the conditions to wield a gun.

Bruh this is the same as car liscensing. Car liscences are given to those who are respinsible enough to drive, and if they make a mistake their liscences are taken. So nope.

Nope. Guns are fine so long as the usage is responsible

So, to avoid getting in the wrong hands, the must not be to sale to the general public

Many people in the general public are responsible enough to have them. The problem is not the people but who gets them. Which is why we need liscensing.

And to avoid that, the selling of guns should be lowered

Nope. Gun sales are allowed. But people need liscences to buy them. So your wrong.

But even if they have a license, they could use it for bad. There should be a psychological test to see if they are in the conditions to wield a gun.

Bruh this is the same as car liscensing. Car liscences are given to those who are respinsible enough to drive, and if they make a mistake their liscences are taken. So nope.

Can you shoot someone with a car from a distance?

And can you ran over many people with a gun? Also just to remind you car's dont require amo, unlike guns.

This is angering both of us, so I'm going to quit this discussion because I don't want to get out of control and become a toxic person, and because I ran out of arguments.