Imgflip Logo Icon

Maga Taliban

Maga Taliban | MORE GUNS, AND INSERTING RELIGION INTO LAW; WINNING | image tagged in taliban soldiers,memes,politics,religion,law,women rights | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
1,167 views 7 upvotes Made by Manhattan 2 years ago in politics
Taliban Soldiers memeCaption this Meme
58 Comments
[deleted]
4 ups, 2y,
4 replies
Lol. I love it when snowflakes who’ve never seen the Taliban firsthand, compare them to America. Ask the Taliban how they’d feel about a transgendered woman leading their medical program. Or a female VP who was a minority. The level of stupidity spewing from the mouths of the the left is astronomical.
[deleted]
4 ups, 2y,
3 replies
The right wing is working very hard to learn from the taliban, scotus wants to go after gay marriage next, you guys are one more scotus ruling away from taliban
[deleted]
1 up, 2y
Lady, you are hysterical. Calm down. It’ll be alright. Find a fidget spinner and a safe space.
[deleted]
1 up, 2y,
1 reply
Just like Roe v Wade, gay marriage was also rule by force. It is law created by the Courts. The Court cannot make law. They had neither the right or the authority to make gay marriage the law of the land.

Once again the voice of the people was overruled by un-elected officials. Just like the Taliban.

The best solution to gay marriage is to get the government completely out of the marriage business. Marriage is a religious ceremony. It always has been. Marriages performed by the government is a hold over from Europe when the church and state were one. It was probably kept because there were some, not all, churches who would refuse to marry couples where the woman was pregnant.

Those days are long gone. There are even gay churches. So get the government out of the marriage business altogether. There should be no law or court rulings regarding marriage whatsoever. The churches can decide what kind of marriages they will perform.

If you are not religious then why do you want to have a religious ceremony that means nothing to you performed on you anyway. Marriage is a commitment between a man, a woman and God. Some churches will interpret that differently. But why on earth do you want to swear your love for another person to the government. Governments, all governments, are only good at three things, killing, stealing and enslaving and you want people to swear their love for each other to that?
3 ups, 2y
"Just like Roe v Wade, gay marriage was also rule by force"

No it wasn't

"It is law created by the Courts"

No it's not

"The Court cannot make law"

And they didn't

"They had neither the right or the authority to make gay marriage the law of the land"

Yes they did

"Once again the voice of the people was overruled by un-elected officials. Just like the Taliban"

Because we all know the Taliban supports same sex marriage? Okay, chief

"Marriage is a religious ceremony. It always has been"

That's a lie. It's a civil institution. It doesn't necessarily have anything to do with religion.

"So get the government out of the marriage business altogether"

So that only churches can decide who can get married? Not a chance.

"There should be no law or court rulings regarding marriage whatsoever. The churches can decide what kind of marriages they will perform"

What a load of horseshit. Marriage is not necessarily a religious ceremony.

"If you are not religious then why do you want to have a religious ceremony that means nothing to you performed on you anyway."

Because it's NOT necessarily religious

"Marriage is a commitment between a man, a woman and God"

Once again, not necessarily
4 ups, 2y,
1 reply
Rule by force? Mike pence is no longer a friend of mine" he did not do the right thing" by force? is cohersion force? how about hanging? how about killing capitol cops while trying to prevent a legal and peaceful and historic transfer of power? is that 'force'? How about forcing kids to have babies, even if raped, is that 'force'? how about makeing teachers stop teaching ideas because its not reliegious enough? yes the right wing is all about force..... hence the culmination on Jan 6
4 ups, 2y
"There were no hanging"

Not for lack of trying

"they did nothing to stop it"

Prove it

"There was nothing legal about a fraudulent election"

And the 2020 election wasn't fraudulent. Get over it.

"None of the rioters were armed"

Some of them actually were

"Most importantly the riot would not have happened if there weren't FBI operatives in the crowd trying to start it"

It was planned and organized by Trump supporters. Even if there were a handful of FBI agents in the crowd, it's bullshit to think that they started the violence

"Jan 6th was not an insurrection, it was a protest of a stolen election"

It was a protest that turned violent because many people showed up with the intention of committing violence. Otherwise why would they bring weapons, build a gallows, and be chanting for the execution of numerous politicians. And again, the election was not stolen, you just lost.

"There was no forcing of anything except for the fact that you guys forced a senile idiot into a job he was never qualified for"

You lost. Get over it.

"I'm sure the poor and lower middle class are very happy trying to decide between putting gas in their car just to get to work and paying their rent/mortgage and feeding their families"

Which of course they never had to worry about under Republican presidents (sarcasm)

"The longer your fraudulent president is in office the worse this inflation is going to get"

He's not fraudulent, you just lost. Get over it.

"Biden is a plant who was installed by China, Russia, the World Economic Forum, the IMF and the UN. He doesn't represent America, he destroying it"

You just lost, get over it. Also, none of those organizations are able to put a president into office. You should try learning about this country sometime and how the government works.
4 ups, 2y,
1 reply
Guess you didnt watch the hearings, you should catch some reruns....

None of the rioters were armed."" Bullshit

They weren't trying to overthrow the government."" What? thats EXACTLY what they were trying to do.

weren't FBI operatives in the crowd trying to start it."' omfg.

Ok sorry, its obvious you are a cult member. Have a good day.
[deleted]
1 up, 2y,
2 replies
Why would I even waste my time with that witch trial. It means nothing and nothing will come of it.

Not one single rioter that I have read about was charge with illegally bringing a firearm into the Capitol Bldg. Not one single rioter was carrying a firearm into the Capitol Bldg.

If some whack job leftist Representative wanted to try to make a point by saying there were firearms just to get that entered into the record so he can try to score points with his or her constituents, it means nothing. It is not the truth.

Some of rioters picked up flag poles and other things that could be used offensively or defensively. But they never injured anyone with those improvised weapons. They weren't even charged with anything related to those weapons.

The cult are the Trump haters. In all my years I have not ever seen a president more hated by any political party that the hatred you guys have for Trump. I am astounded that one of you guys haven't tried to assassinate him. Even after being out of the White House for almost 2 years you can stop carrying on about him.

You hate him so much that you would rather have this idiot as you president.

And the craziest thing that still floors me, is you had to make up stuff to hate him about. I could have easily pointed out stuff that I didn't like about Trump. I didn't even vote for him in 2016. I was ambivalent about voting for him in 2020. In fact my vote was more of an anti-Biden vote than it was a pro Trump vote. Because I knew what a colossal mistake Biden was.

You guys never paid any attention to him. Every single legitimate Democrat vote was not FOR Biden. They were all against Trump.

If any of you, just once, took those hate Trump glasses off you might have seen it also. But you all were just too lost in your hatred to even see straight and you still are lost.
3 ups, 2y
"Some of rioters picked up flag poles and other things that could be used offensively or defensively. But they never injured anyone with those improvised weapons"

They did injure people with weapons, and they're on video doing so

"The cult are the Trump haters"

We aren't the ones who literally made a golden idol of him

"And the craziest thing that still floors me, is you had to make up stuff to hate him about"

No we didn't
3 ups, 2y,
1 reply
You can hide your head in the sand if you want... but real Americans and Real Patriots from all parties see it for what it is... first one twice impeached, likely the first one going to prison.

As he oversees Jan. 6 panel, U.S. Rep. Adam Kinzinger says Trump’s ‘total disregard for the Constitution and his oath will be fully exposed’
By John Byrne
Chicago Tribune

Jun 23, 2022 at 5:40 pm

And he did.

Republican member of the Capitol attack panel also says Trump’s actions surrounding the deadly riot had ‘criminal involvement’

and now the sick sycophant maga is,,,,,,,,

2 days ago — Rep. Adam Kinzinger said he is receiving "constant" death threats, including a threat of execution against his wife and five-month-old ...
[deleted]
1 up, 2y,
6 replies
That is a whole lot of nothing. What do I care about the opinion of a Representative I don't even know who is not from my state and does not represent me?

I'm sorry that he is getting death threat but death threats seem to come with the job title nowadays. Just like when Justice Alito's draft opinion on Roe v Wade was released how leftists begin to camp out in front of all of the more constitutional minded justices homes and threatened them and their families. Both parties get them but by far the left is far more vocal in their contempt for any political figure they disagree with.

You want to talk about total disregard for the Constitution then you really need to look at the Democrat party before you even begin to look at the Republicans. Yes, there are a lot of Republicans who hate the Constitution but EVERY SINGLE DEMOCRAT is an enemy to the Constitution. They only quote the Constitution when it suits their purposes.

Trump did do some things that were somewhat unconstitutional. Like asking Pence to something no vice president has the authority to do.

Although Trump never followed through with it, he came out in support of "Red Flag" laws. That is a law that allows some weenie leftists who wets himself every time he sees his shadow to report that he found out that some big bad evil person owns a gun. And because he wet himself so much that the pee has overflowed his Depends, he reports this person to the police. The police, without probable cause and without a search warrant then confiscates this persons gun while they do a check to see if this man is a threat to anyone. And if this is a blue state the person might not ever see their gun ever again. It doesn't matter if the person whose gun was confiscated is a threat to anyone or not, just because someone reports him he may end up having his gun confiscated.

And, yes, I am very much opposed to "Red Flag" laws. They are a violation of the 2nd, 4th and 5th Amendment.

Do you even know what the Constitution is and what it means? Have you ever read it?
3 ups, 2y,
2 replies
Aww some whack dude posting crap on FB has his gun taken.... ohhhh booo hoooo..... Sorry the 15 year rape or just drunk teen being forced to carry a child to term is a lot more infuriating.

Not a fan of red flag, but hey maybe that whack Kyle would not have been able to kill... ditto for so many others.

Time to buyback, confiscate, and ban many guns. Like all other civilized nations.
[deleted]
0 ups, 2y
"Aww some whack dude posting crap on FB has his gun taken."

Just like a leftist to not understand or even care about private property rights or the right to self-defense. Your facetious "boo hooo" over someone having anything confiscated by the government shows you care nothing about the rights of the individual or even freedom itself.

The very foundation of freedom rests on private property rights. If we are deprived of this right then we do not own anything. Sure John Lennon wrote a really good tune with the lyrics "imagine no possessions". But what every good little Marxist just does not realize that if you do not own anything, then someone else does. In a Marxist society that someone else is the government. They want to tell you it is the people collectively but that ends up being just a lie. When someone else owns everything they set the rules of the use of such property. Much like when you rent an apartment or a house vs when you own a condo or a house (minus those stupid HOA's).

Other nations who do not recognized the value of an individual's right to self-defense are NOT civilized. They are authoritarian. They may ALLOW their citizens more freedoms than China or North Korea but the first step on the road to serfdom is the first violation of a person's inalienable right. The more rights that are stepped on the further down the road we travel.

The right to self-defense predates the US Constitution. It has been discussed by free thinking men and women centuries before the United States. The same with private property rights. What makes them inalienable is the fact that these rights cannot be made alien to the person. They are inherent rights that all men and women have. They are not given by any government. These rights come from God and only God can give them and take them away. So, even if you are an atheist that still holds true. No man has the right or authority to take your inalienable rights away from you.

The purpose of the Bill of Rights is to enforce on the government that these rights are not for the government to take or give. Congress is forbidden to make law that violates any of those rights. Everyone has the right to arm themselves. Everyone has the right to be secure in their papers and possessions. The only way the government can violate the right to be secure in you papers and possession is if A) the police have probable cause and B) they have a valid search warrant.
[deleted]
0 ups, 2y
Oh and BTW. More Australians own guns now than they did before their forced buyback.

Banning guns only bans them from the law abiding and NEVER the criminals. The reason why they are criminals is because they do not care what laws you pass. The overwhelming majority of violent crimes with handguns are committed with stolen guns or guns purchased on the black market (which most of them are also stolen). No one goes down to Buford's Gun and Tackle shop, buys a gun and then goes and rapes, steal or murder people. The first crime they commit is stealing a gun.

In the real world (not leftist fantasy world) a gun is used 3.6 times more to prevent crime than to commit crime. And that is just the reported cases. That number could be much higher. It could be that a gun is used 10 times more to stop a crime then to commit a crime.

Despite all of the bogus "studies" the left comes up with there is one fact that blows their propaganda out of the water, human nature. Everyone and I mean everyone does not want to get shot. This includes criminals, all criminals. So of a criminal sees or knows someone has a gun they will avoid that person like the plague.

TV and movies portray tough guys, either bad or good guys) as appearing not to care that a gun is pointed at them. That is TV and movies. It is fantasy and not reality.

This is why cities with the strictest gun laws have the highest violent crime rates and cities with the most lenient gun laws have the least amount of violent crime.

So if you want a truly civilized nation then require everyone (with the exception of psychopaths) a gun and give them training on firearm safety. No, it will not create the Wild West. People will not go running around shooting people randomly. That is leftist propaganda. This nation has had absolute gun freedom until the 1920's or 30 when the Thompson machine gun was made illegal to own. That was the first gun law that I know of. So if everyone had absolute freedom with guns then if the left is right we should all be dead. But we're not, not even close. That is because people are basically good and most obey the laws of society.

Taking guns away from law abiding citizens is just going to create a whole lot more violent crime. It paints a big fat target on everyone of us. And that is fact that you can take to the bank.
1 up, 2y,
1 reply
"Both parties get them but by far the left is far more vocal in their contempt for any political figure they disagree with"
[deleted]
0 ups, 2y
Would you just look at the quality and attention to detail those guys put into those gallows. It is amazing.... amazing that it could ever stand the weight of a human body without collapsing. Those gallows were never intended to be used, it was just a symbol.

"When the people fear the government there is tyranny, when the government fears the people there is freedom." Those gallows were a symbol of freedom.

You see, when the left attacked the Capitol Bldg back in 1971 and the Senate Bldg in 1983, they used bombs. They didn't just show up with a wobbly gallows, they actually did real damage and threatened lives. Fortunately no one was hurt in either bombing.

I don't seem to remember those attacks being called an insurrection. I wonder why.

Is it the same reason that Democrat politicians told the police to stand down and let Antifa burn areas of their cities to the ground for nearly a full year?

All of those actions were committed by communists who actually do want to overthrow our system of government and replace it with a communist government, ya know a real insurrection. They weren't protesting a fraudulent election.
1 up, 2y,
1 reply
New University of Sydney figures on gun ownership in Australia:

Australian civilians now own more than 3.5 million registered firearms, an average of four for each licensed gun owner.

The proportion of Australians who hold a gun licence has fallen by 48 percent since 1997.

****The proportion of Australian households with a firearm has fallen by 75 percent in recent decades.

Data indicates that people who already own guns have bought more rather than an increase in new gun owners.
[deleted]
0 ups, 2y
Okay but the point I was saying that the forced buy back did not work. In fact it kind of backfired. Australia wanted to take guns out of the hands of the citizens by force but they didn't change the laws on gun ownership. Mainly because those laws are set in the territories. Some territories are more right leaning than others. In fact most of the ones in the lesser populated areas are more right leaning.

It's never the right you have to worry about anyway. The vast majority of shootings in America are caused by the left. There are a handful of right wing psychopaths but the left really has the corner on that market. The school shooting in Uvalde, Texas was a leftist as were all of the other school shootings.
1 up, 2y
"Oh and BTW. More Australians own guns now than they did before their forced buyback"

That's an outright lie.

Quite the opposite - LESS Australians own guns now than they did before the buyback.
Those who still own guns have bought more guns, because you can never have enough diminutive phallic compensation units.

https://www.sydney.edu.au/news-opinion/news/2021/04/28/new-gun-ownership-figures-revealed-25-years-on-from-port-arthur.html
1 up, 2y,
1 reply
vast majority of shootings in America are caused by the left.

Yes, done by the people against guns.
[deleted]
0 ups, 2y
Apparently so. Don't ask me why, I just read the news and pay attention to who those psychopaths are. Apparently there is a whole lot of do-as-I-say-not-as-I-do mentality on the left.

Besides not all leftists are anti gun. I have a nephew who is a full on bleeding heart liberal who likes to shoot targets at a gun range.

I also read about Antifa members taking tactical weapons training in preparation for whatever, and this was before 2020 when they rioted, looted, killed, destroyed and burned the Democrat controlled cities in the country.

You do know why Kyle Rittenhouse's friend gave him a gun don't you? Because Antifa and all the other assorted commie twits were out there with guns shooting up the place. I'll bet you didn't hear that in the mainstream news. They probably even failed to mention that on Fox News. I learned this fact by watching many of the videos that were taken the night that Kyle defended his life. One of the videos had sound and you could hear the guns shots and see the muzzle flashes all around the place. Kyle's gunshots only accounted for 3 of the total gunshots that night. I'm guessing there were at least 20 or 30 gunshots and that was just in those few minutes of the videos of that night. This had been going on for several nights.

So you tell me. Why does your side opposed guns but then use them with evil intent all of the time. Is it that you just oppose conservatives having guns? Is that because you guys want to kill all of the conservatives and you don't want any opposition? I don't know. You tell me.
0 ups, 2y
"Both parties get them but by far the left is far more vocal in their contempt for any political figure they disagree with"

Prove it

"You want to talk about total disregard for the Constitution then you really need to look at the Democrat party before you even begin to look at the Republicans"

No we don't

"EVERY SINGLE DEMOCRAT is an enemy to the Constitution"

Hyperbolic bullshit. Don't expect people to take you seriously when you make such untrue statements.

"Although Trump never followed through with it, he came out in support of "Red Flag" laws. That is a law that allows some weenie leftists who wets himself every time he sees his shadow to report that he found out that some big bad evil person owns a gun"

And yet I've seen numerous conservatives here say that liberals should have their guns taken away. Good luck with that. I hope you have life insurance.
3 ups, 2y
If it wasn't for Newspeak, you wouldn't have anything to say at all,,,
3 ups, 2y
"The right wing is what????"

Similar to the Taliban

"The right wing wants NOTHING to do with the Taliban"

And yet they have so much in common

"How it doesn't work is when leftist activist Supreme Court justices are put into the Court"

But you're okay with rightist activist justices

"In doing this the Supreme Court then CREATED law"

No they didn't

"The Taliban are authoritarians and rule by force, not by the will of the people"

Like many conservatives want to

"The left got the Supreme Court to rule by force, not by the will of the people"

No they didn't

"The left wanted what they wanted and they were not going to let something like the voice of the American people get in the way. Rule by force. JUST LIKE THE TALIBAN."

Just like conservatives
3 ups, 2y
The main difference between the Taliban, ISIL, al Queda, Islamic Brotherhood, Boko Haram, etc, and the Alt Right (other than Mohammed) is that the Alt Reight MAGAt traitor Trumpites gave up fighting and went home to munch on their Hot Pockets after Jan 6th.

Interestingly, it has been noted that they are both born of the same psychology down to hangups, as if that wasn't in screaming neon confetti already for all to see.
3 ups, 2y
"Ask the Taliban how they’d feel about a transgendered woman leading their medical program. Or a female VP who was a minority."

You mean the far right conservative sedititious authoritarian Taliban differ from how the far right conservative sedititious authoritarian Alt Righties in how they feel so exceedingly vehemently against the prospect of both of those?

Good to know!
2 ups, 2y
We're comparing the far right to the Taliban, not America as a whole
2 ups, 2y
snowflake? lol you maga take the cake.....
2 ups, 2y,
3 replies
At least the right for a man to wear a dress and be obnoxious is still okay. Celebrate your small victories. It's not like you're getting pregnant anytime soon.
3 ups, 2y,
1 reply
3 ups, 2y
3 ups, 2y,
2 replies
God forbid people in a free country be free.
[deleted]
1 up, 2y,
1 reply
Yes, free….

But free for everyone, not just certain groups that you (proverbially you, not personal you) like and support.

Free to carry a gun, free to choose if you want to make a cake or not, free to make fun of posters on a meme site….the list is long
2 ups, 2y,
1 reply
Yes, free to carry a gun around in your own house. Once in public though it becomes a public threat, so no on that.

Make a cake or not? Depends, what is the reason again? oh because they are gay? sounds a lot like back in my day, 'because they are black'.... sorry again... you have to bake the stupid cake.
[deleted]
2 ups, 2y,
1 reply
Your definition of free seems to have some asterisks to it. “That ain’t free, boy” so take your asterisks and…
2 ups, 2y,
2 replies
Yes it has has asterisks, freedom does not extend to discrimination, or public threats.
[deleted]
1 up, 2y,
1 reply
Just because you have a gun in you, does not automatically make you a public threat. Unless you are “one of those”
2 ups, 2y,
2 replies
everyone of em could be a nutjob... public threat. Imagine if this whacko did not have a gun that night. he would still be going to college and 2 men would still be alive, 100s of others not affected. Simple solution, he does not have the gun in public.
[deleted]
1 up, 2y,
2 replies
I get it, you think all guns are scary and should be locked up…maybe you should try living you life without being afraid of your own shadow
2 ups, 2y
afraid??? aaafraaaid? LOLOLOL says the guy walking around with an assault weapon.... now thats rich..
2 ups, 2y
[deleted]
1 up, 2y,
1 reply
Thank god he had a gun. I’d rather be judged by 12 than carried by six.
2 ups, 2y,
2 replies
If he had no gun... he would be living a normal life right now, and those men would be alive, and those tax dollars saved.... who is your God? Satan?
[deleted]
1 up, 2y
Society is better off without those 2 pos. We would be better off without a shitload more like them
[deleted]
1 up, 2y
He’s a hero to those on the right. The poster boy for the 2nd Amendment. Half the country hated him before, the same half still hates him. I think he’s a hero. He’ll make more money this year than you’ll make your whole life. Yeah, sucks to be him.
[deleted]
1 up, 2y,
1 reply
Discrimination among the government, maybe. In your own dealings, why shouldn’t it be allowed to live YOUR life as YOU want without being told you have to treat them nice
2 ups, 2y,
2 replies
[deleted]
1 up, 2y
Oh look, another meme that totally misses what was being said. No shocker there with some folks
[deleted]
1 up, 2y
[deleted]
1 up, 2y,
1 reply
Free to murder? Lol. You’re hilarious. Sadistic, but hilarious.
2 ups, 2y,
1 reply
Every time you say 'murder' you lose. that is the point. its not a person, its not murder.
[deleted]
1 up, 2y,
2 replies
It’s a fetus. Science says so. Look up the word fetus and get back to me.
2 ups, 2y
Where does the US Constitution say that a fetus is a person?
1 up, 2y
https://people.psych.ucsb.edu/gazzaniga/PDF/A%20thoughtful%20distinction%20between%20embryo%20and%20Human.pdf
Taliban Soldiers memeCaption this Meme
Created with the Imgflip Meme Generator
IMAGE DESCRIPTION:
MORE GUNS, AND INSERTING RELIGION INTO LAW; WINNING