It's a problem of metaphysical morality and our cultures ability to follow it, not guns.

May you always be privileged to have such a narrow understanding of sexual violence . . .

This is the logic of anti-gun leftists.

It's the logic of someone who reads widely. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18812246/ gives an introduction to some of the horrors of rape, which doesn't require male genitalia to commit. If you can stomach it, the documentaries The Greatest Silence: Rape in the Congo and Weapon of War: Confessions of Rape in the Congo give a lot of information. *but trigger warning!*

Okay.

That's not my point. I am making a comparison, that the people who want to do horrible things, will do horrible things no matter what, taking away their guns, nah.

People lose their tempers. If they have a gun on them, things that would become fist fights become shootings -- and without the high-speed, military style guns, they can't become mass shootings the way they do here. The UK and Japan have plenty of assaults, but almost no gun deaths.

That doesn't happen. Only in blue areas my guy (Chicago).

People only lose their tempers in Chicago?

And assorted other "provinces governed by dems" evidently!

Meaning, that these sorts of crimes mainly happen in places with no trust and defunding of police.

Not really, no.

NOPE. Look deeper than states and you'll find provinces governed by dems are always full of more violence.

"Frush91_novai

NOPE. Look deeper than states and you'll find provinces governed by dems are always full of more violence.

You'll find provinces governed by dems are always full of more violence?
Actually you won't, for two reasons.

Where you from, btw?

*taking away their guns even if you could*