The leading cause of homicide is humans

You don’t blame a boxing glove for punching someone, so why blame the gun for shooting someone?

They only do it when a liberal is behind the trigger...

I would say that mental illness, anger, infidelity,and jealousy are the leading cause of homicide are the leading cause of death in America.
BTW, more people are killed with hammers than guns

we don't even need that much gun control. we just have to give licenses to the mentally healthy

You call yourself "pro-life", yet you are advocating for deadly weapons being accessible to everyone???

Somewhat, but I’m not advocating for people to kill each other with deadly weapons. And when did I say “everyone”? I don’t think felons should have access to guns, I don’t think minors should have access to guns, and I don’t think people with a severe mental illness that can cloud judgment and/or cause violent outbursts should have guns. Owning a gun isn’t killing a human, abortion is. Do you support the ownership of knives? If so you’re worse than gun supporters because the fatality rate for knife violence is higher than the fatality rate for gun violence. In other words if you own a steak knife you actually own a weapon more deadly than guns.

1. a fetus can't feel pain 2. guns aren't needed for cooking.

Ok, so I can simply kill someone with Congenital insensitivity to pain?
Neither are knives you can simply tear things apart with your hands, in fact you could actually argue a gun is more important for cooking than a knife because no one hunts with a knife, they do however hunt with guns.

Andd, if no amount of dead children (who have consciousness, emotions and are able to feel pain) isn't a reason to take away your rights, why is an amount of dead 'children' (who don't have consciousness, emotions or the ability to feel pain) a reason to take away someone's rights?

Because lives can be saved with citizen gun ownership, lives cannot be saved with recreational abortion. And once again you could simply use guns for target practice and/or hunting, you can’t have an abortion without killing a human.

How the hell do guns 'save' lives? They are literally made for the sole purpose of killing.

The majority are made for the sole purpose of killing murders, rapists, or other forms of assailants, abortion is made for the sole purpose of killing THE MOST INNOCENT human beings in the world.

Also the beings that can't feel anything. I somehow have a feeling that you aren't pro-life, just anti-woman.

“Anti-woman”, what is a woman? Matt Walsh asked that question a year ago and you guys have still failed to answer it. Plus, how is saying that you shouldn’t kill preborn women “anti-women”?

You value the rights of an unconscious tiny fetus over the rights of an actual person?

You know that food can be obtained by another ways than hunting, right?

“You value the rights of an unconscious tiny fetus over the rights of an actual person?”

You still haven’t answered my freakin’ question so why should I answer yours? What makes a fetus not a person?

It doesn't have consciousness, emotions nor an ability to feel pain. Also, it lives inside the body, somewhat like a parasite; it gets literally everything from the organism it's inside of.

That’s a half-assed definition of what defines a life. It’s human since it comes from human reproduction and holds human DNA, it’s an individual human because it holds new DNA not identical to the mother. A plant cannot feel pain, a plant is not conscious, and a plant is a life form the difference tho is that a plant will never gain consciousness. Now your parasite argument applies to literally all humans because we were once fetuses and therefore deserve to die. The mother was a parasite to her mother, so what gives her the right to kill another human parasite?
Further more that sounds a lot like illegal immigrants, they’re foreign beings surviving off of an alien host. Now the one problem with your whole parasite argument is that it’s retarded, it’s really not similar to a parasite at all. A parasite has to be a foreign species living in or on another species consuming nutrients at the cost of their host. A fetus is not a foreign species and the circumstances are the exact opposite of parasites. The majority of cases of parasites the parasite forces their way in, on the contrary the majority of pregnancies are caused willingly by the mother’s own consent to have intercourse.
Now I’ll tell you the actual definition of life. (You know like legitimate science rather than the Woke Cult’s religious teachings)

“ the condition that distinguishes animals and plants from inorganic matter, including the capacity for growth, reproduction, functional activity, and continual change preceding death.”

The CAPACITY for growth, reproduction, functional activity, and continual change preceding death.
I know California is the most illiterate state, so you may have trouble understanding. The word “c a p a c I t y” means ability, so a fetus still counts as a life since it holds the ability to do all of those things after a certain amount of time.
A fetus’ cells start to multiply at the moment of conception and is therefore growing, it will be able to reproduce with a matter of time, it will eventually be capable of functional activity, and it has continual change preceding death. You could also argue it’s already performing functional activity since it is meeting the demands of it’s environment by growing. You could actually argue a woman who has an abortion fails to meet the standards of life worse than the fetus since she proved she doesn’t want to reproduce and she failed to perform functional activity because the demands of her environment was to give birth.

Yes, plants indeed are alive. Yet we still kill plants. And just because I used the word "parasite", it doesn't mean they are LITERALLY parasites, as there is this thing called a "metaphor". Your "illegal immigrant" argument doesn't make any sense because: 1. immigrants don't solely survive off "an alien host". They use their help to be able to have a job so that they can be independent. 2. fetuses are "surviving off an alien host" probably because the condom broke. Immigrants are "surviving off an alien host" because 'Muricans attacked their country for oil in the name of "freedum and democracy".
3. There seems to be a high chance that you are a descendant of illegal immigrants who came to 'Murica and genocided natives.
And, referring to human rights as a "cult" and a "mental illness" seems a little bit weird. Yes, people maybe shouldn't have straight sex if they don't want to be pregnant. But also, how the hell are you going to stop people from f**king each othet?

By the way do you think the Native Americans thought of each other of as fellow Native Americans? Well, no they didn’t they thought of each other as different tribes and fought amongst themselves well before we showed up. War has always been about who has the bigger stick and we happened to have bigger sticks and ended in victory. Do I think the settlers were in the wrong killing the natives? Yes, but everyone in the equation were despicable scumbags and nothing more. “An eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth leaves everyone blind and toothless” just because a lot of our ancestors immigrated here and did bad things doesn’t justify allowing drug lords to infiltrate our country illegally.

“There seems to be a high chance that you are a descendant of illegal immigrants who came to 'Murica and genocided natives.”

What made you conclude that? I came from legal European immigrants in the late 1800s.

The condom broke and that’s not the fetuses fault, live up to your mistakes and take responsibility. Why do humans deserve rights? Have intercourse, but if you get pregnant don’t kill your child it’s as simple as that. People just shouldn’t sleep around in general ‘cause all it does increase the spread of STDs. You can’t have SEXUALLY transmitted diseases if you minimize sexual activity. Proper science would simply conclude that we were supposed mate for life, not look for an unnatural preventative of STDs.

What the hell are you supposed to do with a kid you can't raise?

Put them up for adoption there’s lists miles long for babies. You guys argue there’s hundreds of children in foster care, but those are primarily teenagers who probably have developed border line personality disorder and similar illnesses, not 6 month old babies.

Who is going to adopt all those kids?

The 20% of women who’re infertile.

I feel like many out of that 20% don't want kids or aren't able to raise them at the moment.

“You value the rights of an unconscious tiny fetus over the rights of an actual person?”

Though, since I do actually put a bit of effort into trying to be a semi-respectable person, unlike you I guess I’ll answer your question. No, no I do not value the rights of an preborn child over the rights of a post-born person. I value them equally and I don’t recall ever saying that anyone had the right to murder someone.
It’s very strange how you materialize things in your brain, you’re seriously proving liberalism is in fact a mental disorder. You guys always talk about “women’s rights” and what not, but you can never explain what gives women these rights, sort of like all of your beliefs. You can never explain what gender is, you can never explain why a fetus doesn’t count as a life, and you can never explain why men should pay child support, but simultaneously be entirely irrelevant in the case of abortion.