On # 3, it depends. First trimester, I agree with you. Last trimester (baring a medical reasons) I wholeheartedly disagree with you. I think the second trimester gets iffy.
IN 1961'S POE V ULLMAN SUPREME COURT CASE LEFTIST ACTIVIST JUSTICES TRIED TO INTRODUCE THE RIGHT TO PRIVACY BETWEEN MARRIED COUPLES. THE CASE WAS ABOUT DOCTOR PATIENT PRIVACY BECAUSE CONNECTICUT HAD A LAW THAT MADE IT ILLEGAL FOR DOCTORS TO DISTRIBUTE CONTRACEPTIVES. THE CASE WAS THROWN OUT BECAUSE THE LAW WAS NEVER ENFORCED. IN 1965'S GRISWOLD V CONNECTICUT THE SUPREME COURT TRIED AGAIN WITH THE SAME LAW THAT WAS NEVER ENFORCED AND THIS TIME THE LAW WAS OVERTURNED AND INCLUDED WAS THE RIGHT TO MARITAL PRIVACY. IN 1972'S EISENSTADT V BAIRD THE COURTS EXPANDED MARITAL PRIVACY UNMARRIED COUPLES. THIS TIME THEY ADDED THE PHRASE "TO BEAR OR BEGET A CHILD". THE PHRASE HAD NO BEARING ON THE CASE, THEY JUST NEEDED IT SO THEY COULD USE IT NEXT YEAR IN ROE V WADE. IN 1973'S ROE V WADE, ALL OF THE PLANNING OF PLANNED PARENTHOOD AND THE ACTIVIST JUSTICES GOT ALL OF THE PIECES IN PLACE TO BE USED TO ORCHESTRATE THE INFANTICIDE OF MILLIONS AND MILLIONS OF BABIES.
