I agree, but I expect there will be a lot of debate about what a "real abortion" is, and not every law will take a common-sense view.
"Fetal heartbeat bills" anyone? We're told by many pro-lifers that a fetus's heartbeat determines its right-to-life. However, from those hooked up to life support for years, we know you can have a heartbeat and still be effectively dead, making further efforts at resuscitation futile.
You might think I'm just being contrary, but Ireland had a case exactly on point. A fetus had a heartbeat but was basically dead and causing her mother to develop and eventually die from sepsis. Her pleas for an abortion were refused. The outcry of over this woman's death led to major reform of Ireland's restrictive abortion laws, the repeal of a Constitutional amendment outlawing abortion, etc.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Death_of_Savita_Halappanavar
Medical decision-making is extremely complex, expecially in pregnancy, and it is right for it to be in the hands of the woman and the doctor, not the government. Which is exactly what Roe v. Wade says. The decision protects women's healthcare - really, it does.
