I seriously hope Roe v Wade is overturned and I seriously hope the left does not do what they always do if it is overturned.

So protests shouldn't be allowed?

Also, the Supreme Court doesn't run the government, so protesting their decision isn't an insurrection

Leftist activist, Chelsea Manning, is calling for people to arm themselves.

The only times that there has been anything resembling an insurrection in the United States (after the Civil War) is when leftists riot. In the 60's the Students for a Democrat Society, the Black Panthers and the Weather Underground were violently marching in the streets to overthrow our government and replace it with a communist government. The New Black Panthers were sending uniformed people to polling places to intimidate voters to vote Democrat. Occupy Wall Street left tons and tons of trash and human waste in cities all over America once they were finished. Native Americans fed up with leftist protesters who were protesting the Keystone Pipeline had to kick them off their land because of all of the trash they were leaving behind. Then there was the BLM/Antifa riots who destroyed billions of dollars of property, ruined the lives of many small business owners and even killed a few people.

All of this is just how the left operates.

Yet the only thing they seem to focus on is 300 people who the Capitol police opened the doors to on Jan 6th, 2021. Many of those 300 people were FBI operatives who triggered this riot. And NO ONE who entered the Capitol building brought any firearms into the building. The only ones who were killed were those who were rioting.

Jan 6th was a drop in the ocean compared to what the left has always done. And if the Supreme Court actually does overturn Roe v Wade the left is going to go nuts again and we'll see more riots, death and destruction than anything we have seen previous.

Roe v Wade is the worst ruling the Court has ever done. Not just because it is about abortion but because it is an extreme abuse of power by the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court CANNOT legislate. They do not have the authority to make law. Our founding fathers were adamant about legislators being elected by the people to represent them. The Court is not elected by the people, therefore they are forbidden to create law. There have been several times the Courts have done this and it is ALWAYS to force something the left was pushing and could not get done through Congress. The left does not care what the American people want, they want a dictatorship with laws enforced by them in spite of the voice of the American people.

"Our founding fathers were adamant about legislators being elected by the people to represent them."

And even then the Founders were iffy on that point because at first Senators were not chosen by direct voting like they are now. It was the state legislators that did that. The only position that people directly voted for on the federal level was the House for local district representation on the federal level.

Senators represent the concerns of the state. The state is controlled by whom the people vote for for their legislators.

It still was the voice of the people. The idea back then is if you were constantly in the minority opinion in your state you could vote with your feet or move to another state.

Even though we are far more transient now than we were then, for some reason we have lost the idea of voting with our feet. Especially on this abortion issue. The left thinks they must have complete control of the nation on this issue and don't even care how this law violates the Constitution. They must force this issue that the majority of the nation is opposed to.

Yeah well they never got past the 'ownership of other humans' phase. Pro-Choice is a BS term. They want the decision a woman decides to be on their terms, not the woman's. Every time I hear 'but rape or incest!' my reply is less than 1% of 1% choose without any coercion to abort.

"Yeah well they never got past the 'ownership of other humans' phase"

Who didn't? It wasn't liberals supporting slavery in the 1800s, it was conservatives.

"Pro-Choice is a BS term"

It's a perfectly valid term

Do you think a rape victim should be forced by law to continue a pregnancy she didn't consent to?

Rape is about 1% of abortions, and incest is less than 0.5%. That is more than "1% of 1%"

https://www.guttmacher.org/sites/default/files/pdfs/pubs/psrh/full/3711005.pdf

What state do you hail from again and haven't any of the locals gotten around to regaling you with tales about their cherished history disrupted by Yankee Northern Liberals who sought to LIBERate those whom who once owned and what does that flag they keep flying represent again?

Exactly. The only choice women are supposed to have is to abort their baby. That is what they mean by Pro-Choice. No one cares if the baby would like to live or die, they just kill it without any concerns about the baby's choice.

You're 100% correct when you say rape and incest is less than 1% of 1%. The overwhelming majority of abortions happen because the baby is an inconvenience.

"The only choice women are supposed to have is to abort their baby. That is what they mean by Pro-Choice"

That is another lie. What pro-choice means is that abortion should be an option if someone chooses it, but they are not required to have an abortion. That's literally what the word choice refers to.

"No one cares if the baby would like to live or die, they just kill it without any concerns about the baby's choice"

Name one fetus who ever said "don't abort me"

"You're 100% correct when you say rape and incest is less than 1% of 1%"

It's actually not less than 1% of 1%

Rape is the reason given for 1% of abortions, and incest for less than 0.5%. That is more than "1% of 1%"

https://www.guttmacher.org/sites/default/files/pdfs/pubs/psrh/full/3711005.pdf

Made a meme a while back that the mistake the Nazis and CCP made was not to make abortion fully legal under the guise of 'choice'.

You would have thought Hitler would have made abortion legal because of his association with Margaret Sanger. But then he didn't want Germans killing their own babies, he wanted everyone else but Germans to kill their babies.

Which he ended up doing anyway cause those he killed were Germanic Jews. . .of course raging psychopaths with political power aren't the smartest people around. . .

That's true. I had read that Hitler idolized Mussolini but after they met, Hitler found out that Mussolini was smarter than him and he disliked him ever since then.

He didn't have a relationship with Margaret Sanger, and Margaret Sanger didn't even support abortion in most cases

In the 60's the Students for a Democrat Society, the Black Panthers and the Weather Underground and a plethora of others were marching in the streets in opposition to an encroaching police state which sought to oppress minorities and other marginalized people and opposition to the Vietnam War and abridge their right to vote, speak, assemble, and bear arms.

Same as they sought to do today to the New Black Panthers, Occupy Wall Street, BLM, Antifa, and anyone else without the mark of the Cult45 Beast.

Native Americans protesters who were protesting the Keystone Pipeline were kicked off by the troops of Derp Fuhrer Trumpf.

Where have you been that you forgot this already?

Didn't you claim that you were living in California when Gov Ronny Reagan used the FBI to seed 'Black' neighborhoods with heroin and passed laws to curtail their Second Amendment Right to Bear Arms in fear that the Black Panthers would fight against his tyranny?

"In the 60's the Students for a Democrat Society, the Black Panthers and the Weather Underground were violently marching in the streets"

That's not an insurrection. That's a march, or protest

"The New Black Panthers were sending uniformed people to polling places to intimidate voters"

The NBBP is not affiliated with the actual Black Panther Party. Most conservatives don't understand that

"Occupy Wall Street left tons and tons of trash and human waste in cities all over America once they were finished"

Being a slob is not an insurrection. It's being a slob.

"Native Americans fed up with leftist protesters who were protesting the Keystone Pipeline had to kick them off their land because of all of the trash they were leaving behind"

Being a slob is not an insurrection. It's being a slob.

"Then there was the BLM/Antifa riots who destroyed billions of dollars of property, ruined the lives of many small business owners and even killed a few people"

That's not an insurrection

"All of this is just how the left operates"

No, it's not. You're taking what some people did and saying everyone on the left is like that. That's called a hasty generalization. It's a logical fallacy.

"Yet the only thing they seem to focus on is 300 people who the Capitol police opened the doors to on Jan 6th, 2021"

And the ones who assaulted cops. Don't forget that. And the ones chanting for politicians to be executed. Don't forget that. And the ones who tried to use threats and violence to stop a free and fair election from being certified. Don't forget that.

"Many of those 300 people were FBI operatives who triggered this riot"

Prove it

"Jan 6th was a drop in the ocean compared to what the left has always done"

So names all the times "the left" (which you seem to think is one single person) stormed the US Capitol to try and stop the certification of election results

"The Supreme Court CANNOT legislate. They do not have the authority to make law"

And they didn't

"The left does not care what the American people want, they want a dictatorship with laws enforced by them in spite of the voice of the American people"

Again, that is a lie. "The left" as a whole doesn't want that. You really need to work on this logical fallacy you keep making over and over and over and over again.

It is a fact that some Mormons rape children. If I said that ALL Mormons rape children, would you agree or disagree?