GOP's credibility problem is when provable election fraud cases favor them

There's plenty of evidence, all you need to do is hope the midterms aren't a disaster for the left. Also, election fraud is the least of worries when Biden's son has so much confirmed dirt on the whole house of cards. It going to be interesting. Get your popcorn.

There is zero evidence. 64 different court cases already proved that (many of which Republican judges ruled on; some Trump appointed himself), as too Trump's own AG - Bill Barr - who had the DOJ look into mass voter fraud claims and told him they were total BS, as well as Trump appointee - Chris Krebs - for Director of CISA (Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency) for Homeland Security who stated this was the most secure election in US history, and every Republican state governor, secretary of state, etc, etc, etc. who too also refuted those claims. Unsurprisingly, Trump declares all of them RINOS because they refused to support his lie.

The Democrats control the Courts and the Media , so of course there's no evidence

Not all of it. Trump is making speeches instead of being in jail and just won his lawsuit against Stormy. There is clearly enough evidence for Trump to use against Hillary in that lawsuit to.

and in other news , a New York District Attorney shut down the New York AG's investigation into Trump's financials , so they're not all evil

What makes you think it's shut down? How do you know that's not merely a ploy by the AG to make certain people feel more relaxed and begin to get sloppy in their communcations, all the while the DOJ's already received court approval to tap into everyone of their calls, text messages, etc. to gain future evidence?

The District Attorney's all over the state want to have nothing to do with it

BS... NC's AG and the State's Bureau of Investigations have already opened up a criminal investigation into the matter. That information's been widely reported on multiple state and national news outlets as too in dozens of print media publications.

Really? How do you explain all the Republican judges in multiple states - including those Trump appointed himself - all ruling against the bogus claims made in the Trump/GOP post election lawsuits for failing to provide any actual evidence.

One judge stated the claim being made was akin to the stitching together of Frankenstein's monster. Another declared that the case being promoted was entirely without merit and intended solely for the purposes of manipulating public opinion but in a court of law, they must actually produce solid evidence to support their claim, which they failed to do.

Another proclaimed the entire case presented was nothing but hyperbole and speculation, completely devoid of any actual provable evidence albeit supported by those of dubious characters, willing to submit doctored government records, lie about their credentials in affidavits, etc, etc, etc because they refused to accept their favored candidate had legimately lost.