Ex Post Facto rules enforcement - or just censorship? Is it really "Politics" in the EAM that you hate...

imgflip.com/i/4zxri2

Originally featured in the EAM stream on 03-01-21 - BEFORE the rules change - which was later demanded by a certain censorious and narcissistic owner of that stream - and resulted in the creation of EAM_Politics. He really dislikes it when you expose the hypocrisy of his $hitLib heroes.
As can be seen in this comments thread:
imgflip.com/i/4zp3r1

What can't be seen are the Deleted comments from an "ALT" Account, that he uses - which show that these concerns over "rule breaking" - were merely a façade for political considerations, and a penchant for censoring the truths, that he'd rather that people didn't know.

For some reason, more than a year after it was featured, a user named "norsegreen" decided to pick the torch for that guy.

Interesting thread, thanks!

You're welcome! I spent some time, answering all of those deleted attempts at DNCIA 'Hasbarah' - so it's good if it can help people.

I spoke to norsegreen - and it turns out that it was just a random ex post facto rules enforcement... We worked it out, between us. I think the relevant rule for what belongs in a stream, should be the rules in place, at the time it was first featured in a given stream....

Stuff from before separation of the funny and the politics etc. Got stuck into "fun" randomly, it appears. Since most of my memes try to do both, some of my older memes get randomly unfeatured, because they were moved to "fun", and not politics, when the stream system was created. Then a Mod finds them, and retroactively declares them not 'fun' enough - so then they disappear, along with the historical timeline of pre-'streams' imgflip