Why getting a booster shot (I'm getting mine tomorrow morning ;) ) when you can just get sick twice!!

https://rwmalonemd.substack.com/p/a-health-public-policy-nightmare

While I'm not USUALLY a big fan of Eugenics... (Unlike Klaus Schwab and Bill Gates)... But in your case, I'll make an exception... Please... If the first three shots don't kill you or make you sterile... Please keep taking the shots, until they work as intended...

Depends on how good you're at reading and lying.

I don't know where did you get that picture but I got, right here, the latest "COVID-19 vaccine surveillance report Week 5, 3 February 2022" from the UKHS freaking Agency, and that information you're posting doesn't show anywhere.

However tho and nonetheless, we got this thingie "64mxb6.jpg (click to show)"

Seems like the picture you've posted is just one of the many studies they've taken into consideration for their actual report, which is what I'm linking here.

https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1052353/Vaccine_surveillance_report_-_week_5.pdf

"Several studies of vaccine effectiveness have been conducted in the UK against different
COVID-19 variants. Vaccine effectiveness against symptomatic disease with the Omicron
variant is substantially lower than against the Delta variant, with rapid waning. However,
protection against hospitalisation remains high, particularly after 3 doses."

Unless the UKHSA you're refferencing to is by the real UK government from their deep exhile within the hollow Earth's chambers, together with Elvis and the Nazi UFO base, escaping the tyranny of political correctess.

See the colored chart with shades of gray classifying the confidence in different shades of gray? that survey you're posting a picture of, which if it were true, at least half of my friends and neighbors would've died because of the vaccine, is in the white category of "Low Confidence".

I think my source was here: https://dailyexpose.uk/2022/01/19/vaccines-double-chance-of-catching-covid/ - but there's SO MUCH evidence that contradicts your $hilling for BigPfharma... That it's easy to lose track.

You posted a chart that SPECIFICALLY SAYS 3 to 4 months... At which point the effectivness is KNOWN to wane... So what you and THEY are doing is called "Cherry-picking evidence" to support your preferred narrative. And then IGNORING the much better evidence that contradicts it.

Also... What's the Mortality rate of Covid? Are you over 70 with 4 co-morbidities? If not - it VERY EASY to take an infinitesimal number, and not quite double it...for 3 months... At which point you're going to play another round of Pfizer Roullette, with regards to the near-immediate adverse Events... Of Course we won't have any data on the LONGTERM EFECTS for 5-10 years... You should thank Anthony Fauci for at least some of that. He cancelled the trials RIGHT BEFORE the diminimous benefits are KNOWN to wane, at 3 months - and then injected the "Control Arm*" of the study...

Israel is several months, and at least one "booster" ahead of the USA and UK ... You MIGHT want to look at what's happening, there...

https://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/297051

https://alexberenson.substack.com/p/covid-deaths-in-israel-have-hit-an/

Though it's not really a new story...

https://healthimpactnews.com/2021/death-rates-skyrocket-in-israel-following-pfizer-experimental-covid-vaccines/

https://www.science.org/content/article/grim-warning-israel-vaccination-blunts-does-not-defeat-delta

* The FDA allows Vaccine Manufacturers to use OTHER PROBLEMATIC VACCINES - instead of an Inert placebo like Saline, to conduct the "safety and effectiveness" studies. And as we've learned from the UPDATED DEATH TOLLS from Pfizer - their injections actually killed more, than died in the non-placebo placebo group, to a statistically significant extent ... And of course the trials are KNOWN to have excluded many people with typical conditions and health issues. And on top of that - we have other reports of a rigged study from the BMJ/FDA Whistleblower...

https://www.bmj.com/content/375/bmj.n2635

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/facebook-zuckerberg-the-bmj-fact-check-pfizer/

https://www.bmj.com/content/372/bmj.n728/rr-0

You're insisting on the same sources you posted previously, that damned Israeli study that has already been thoroughly debunked.

Also, vaccines tend to wane their effectiveness, which is still more emcompassing and long lasting than natural immunity (achieved through the exact same spike gene assimilation process), and the reason why you need to get shots.

Just one big Nirvana Fallacy, that Science link you posted isn't saying that boosters are more dangerous, a lie you're abounding into with a quick followup to other links so we don't read your Science link further and find this

"Yet boosters are unlikely to tame a Delta surge on their own, says Dvir Aran, a biomedical data scientist at Technion. In Israel, the current surge is so steep that “even if you get two-thirds of those 60-plus [boosted], it’s just gonna give us another week, maybe 2 weeks until our hospitals are flooded.” He says it’s also critical to vaccinate those who still haven’t received their first or second doses, and to return to the masking and social distancing Israel thought it had left behind—but has begun to reinstate."

He's just reminding us that vaccines don't make you invincible, and in the same paragraph, he says that vaccinating those who haven't received their first or second doses "it's also critical".

Then he proceeds to GASP, promote masks and social distancing too, because the vaccines aren't and end all be all.

All I needed to debunk your crap was to read your own sources in their entirety, this is like debating Ben Shapiro.

His book is called How to Debate a Leftist and Win, not how to debate a leftist using factual arguments, or sources that don't contradict my claims upon doing nothing more, than just reading them entirely.

That alone destroys the rest of your post like in a domino line, I don't need to bother addressing your other two links, as they're based in a faulty premise.

Writhe, cope, and get boosted.

On my way to get my third booster shot while wearing a mask as per Dvir Aran's advice (I already wear it in closed spaces and busy streets, just pouring some salt in the wound)

It's FUNNY the way you ignore EVERY OTHER LINK - and then go to the last one (I arranged them in order of confidence and up-to-date timeliness). I posted that one not because I agree with it - because I don't - but to show you a breadth of sources, and a recurring pattern over time.

You keep claiming that "that damned Israeli study that has already been thoroughly debunked"... Really?!?! Because I didn't see that. I saw you link to an Article from the CIA's "Fact-Checking" and narrative repair arm, over at Thomson-Reuters - which concluded only a "lack of context" - and not a substantial refutation of the data ... And you have a far greater appreciation for the validity if their work, than any 'reasonable person' ever should...particularly someone who claims to come from the left - as opposed to the "Intelligence Community".

And which study are you talking about? The one showing Vitamin D3 levels are predictive of infection and outcomes? Because there's many more studies which say that...

https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.09.22.21263977v1

Oh - and there's LOTS of studies and Science and data coming out of Israel. https://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/297051

https://thewatchtowers.org/this-ends-the-debate-israeli-study-shows-natural-immunity-13x-more-effective-than-vaccines-at-stopping-delta/

https://nocamels.com/2022/02/women-covid-haifa-vaccines-pfizer/

https://www.msn.com/en-us/health/medical/covid-19-booster-shot-can-cause-irregular-menstrual-periods-health-ministry/ar-AATEAWx

https://www.globalresearch.ca/ultra-vaxxed-israel-sees-huge-surge-covid-experts-avoid-only-logical-conclusion/5754069

Their death rates have NEVER been higher than in the present moment. Despite four rounds of boosters. The data from Scotland in the meme you had no substantive response to, above - seems to directly contradict the assertions from the UKHSA that you cite, above.

"Vaccine effectiveness against symptomatic disease with the Omicron variant is substantially lower than against the Delta variant, with rapid waning. However, protection against hospitalisation remains high, particularly after 3 doses." - KEY WORDS: "rapid waning". And as we've seen from Israel - the benefits of successive doses of the mRNA Gene Therapy "boosters" appear to decrease more rapidly, and rapidly enter the realm of 'negative effectiveness'. Antibody Dependent Enhancement is a REAL THING. Fauci even acknowledged it, at one point...

https://youtu.be/cU2l699kHOA

COPE

Looks like an idiot - parroting the same CIA Neuro-Linguistic Programming buzzwords thought-terminating cliches that you do... The funny part is that the video has 3 likes ... It's YOU that needs to Cope. Notice that he calls him an "Anti-vaxxer"... Gates and the Pharmafia have been pushing that perjorative for "vaccine injury aware", for quite some time now. Some of the hit pieces are nice enough to call him a Covid policy critic or skeptic. I guess if you start with a negative

You point to a series of Hit pieces put out against Berenson - a former NY Times Reporter. A Twitter Ban? What does that prove - except that he's so on-target that the CUA's Event201 narrative management team deemed him a threat. You know who else was banned from Twitter? It's a long list of unpopular tellers of truth... The inventor of the mRNA Technology that you love so much, Dr Robert Malone, was also banned. When they do that - they make the allegations in a non-specific fashion - so that they can never be refuted.

What you're relying upon is both the appeal to authority fallacy, and the bandwagon fallacy. Jimmy Dore has conversations with people that he disagrees with, all of the time. And agreeing with someone on one point, doesn't mean that you agree in all points.

That cartoon really has your number. I can see why it got under your skin. I'll repost.

Neuro-Linguistic Programming buzzwords thought teminating clichés?

Do you actually believe I'm a CIA spook using advanced tactics of mind control through keywords?

What is this? Imgflip or MK Ultra.

"You point to a series of Hit pieces put out against Berenson - a former NY Times Reporter. A Twitter Ban? What does that prove - except that he's so on-target that the CUA's Event201 narrative management team deemed him a threat. You know who else was banned from Twitter? It's a long list of unpopular tellers of truth... The inventor of the mRNA Technology that you love so much, Dr Robert Malone, was also banned. When they do that - they make the allegations in a non-specific fashion - so that they can never be refuted."

He was banned from Twitter for more, and other stuff he's tried to pull? all listed here, you're replying to Berensen's quackery compilations.

"Jimmy Dore has conversations with people that he disagrees with, all of the time. And agreeing with someone on one point, doesn't mean that you agree in all points. "

I'm literally almost alone, debunking multiple people while also agreeing in certain points before adding some nuance, and Jimmy is straight up giving credit to Berensen's demonstrated lies.

Or maybe I am a CIA operative who's also working for aliens, and Covid is just an alien plot to weaken humanity before a conquest, but you'll never uncover me because I'm all-powerful MUAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.

You're not achieving what you think you are, but don't let that discourage you from trying.

Great Question. I guess you're completely Ignorant of the connections between CIA mInd control - and social media. Twitter recently hired a guy from British Military Intelligence's PSYOPS 77th Brigade.

https://21stcenturywire.com/2020/04/29/77-brigade-is-british-military-waging-an-information-war-on-its-own-population/

https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2011/mar/17/us-spy-operation-social-networks

https://theintercept.com/2014/02/24/jtrig-manipulation/

And no... disagreement with fraudulent narratives doesn't equate to "quakery"... That's the censorship fallback position, of the Empire's narrative managers talking. And that $hill for Fauci Dr Peter Hotez, too. That guy would have burned Gallileo at the stake. You'll just slander him until people are afraid to listen.

I hope that anyone reading this thread will go and listen dissident voices like Jimmy Dore, Glenn Greenwald, James Lyons-Weiler Phd, Steve Kirsch, Dr Peter McCullough, Dr Robert Malone, and Dr Geert Vanden Bosche, the Vaccinologist - some of whom Dore has had on, other he hasn't. Compare the level of understanding, and complexity in their arguments - to the sort of facile debate tactics, fallacies, and easily identifiable propaganda/narrative management strategies that we see from this guy...

You make these claims as if things are proven already QED - without ever offering the proof. I like how you keep going back to that one article, to quote one Dr. I wonder why none of his suggestions helped? Do you think that he still feels that way? He must be as fact resistant and dishonest - or suffering from Mass Formation Psychosis, as you are, if that's the case.

Ivermectin costs the WHO 6¢ a pill. The patents are expired - and anyone can make it... So a minute ago you were telling me about Ivermectin on your nutz... Now you acknowledge that it might work ... Man Narrative 2.0 is hard to keep up with ... And no. Merck doesn't want any side-by-side comparisons against Molnupravir... Or they'd had published their results. You want to bet on which is safer and more effective?

"And no... disagreement with fraudulent narratives doesn't equate to "quakery""

No, agreement with disproved hoaxes doesn't equate to, it is, quackery.

You're posting opinion pieces by conspiracy theorists without a medical background, and the few doctors you link to, are either quacks themselves, or misquoted like you've done with the Israeli doctor that not only insisted on vaccinations, but social distancing and masks on top of that.

https://www.reuters.com/business/healthcare-pharmaceuticals/japans-kowa-says-ivermectin-effective-against-omicron-phase-iii-trial-2022-01-31/

And there's a company pushing it now XD.

Ladies, gents and anything in between and beyond, I present to you, the stooges of the Alt-Big-Pharma.

You've lost your right to be taken at least 10 posts ago, I dunno, I lost count already.

LMAO you ignore all of my links and explanations but then accuse me of ignoring a couple, out of the dozens I've thoroughly debunked? DO YOU EVEN KNOW WHAT AN EQUIVALENCY IS? I CAN USE ALLCAPS TOO XD!!!

Every time I debunked something I ended up repeating myself, forcing you to scrape even further down the bottom of the barrell and then claim victory when I refuse to repeat myself the 98th time out of a 100 times I've already explained the same shit.

But since that all you're really looking is for attention, I guess it won't hurt to give you some, after all, my leftist ideology compels me to be generous:

Fail numero 1: First link of yours basically recommends raising vitamin D rich serum in patients, not that the vaccine causes you to need Vitamin D.

"Conclusions: The two datasets provide strong evidence that low D3 is a predictor rather than a side effect of the infection. Despite ongoing vaccinations, we recommend raising serum 25(OH)D levels to above 50 ng/ml to prevent or mitigate new outbreaks due to escape mutations or decreasing antibody activity."

Fail numero 2: Alex Berensen, yeah, the guy behind Gateway Pundit

https://healthfeedback.org/outlet/gateway-pundit/
The quacking history of Gateway Foundation

The specific article that "ends-the-debate"

https://thewatchtowers.org/this-ends-the-debate-israeli-study-shows-natural-immunity-13x-more-effective-than-vaccines-at-stopping-delta/

Here's how the so called debate ender, gets ended
https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/alex-berenson-banned-from-twitter-after-spreading-false-info-on-israeli-vaccines-1.10162481

No, sorry, this one
https://eu.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2022/01/28/fact-check-omicron-variant-isnt-more-likely-infect-vaccinated/9191880002/

Oh no, that's another study he lied about, every time I try to find the one you're refferring to, another lie from Berenson pops up, shit it's hard to keep up with the crookery. This Berenson fella sure feels like a yard sale Jame's Okeefe.

https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2021/04/pandemics-wrongest-man/618475/

Holly shit I'm done, I don't need to look for 1 more lie and hoax amongst dozens, many of them already from Israel, which is a success vaccination story, look at pudding:

https://ourworldindata.org/coronavirus/country/israel

Pudding was updated just 2 hours ago.

Why would I need to even scoff at Fail numero 3? when I'm running out of room to type? How many more lies you need to be caught with?

Yer full of it

Lmao, do you have more to support your claim than a dumbass sassy meme?

When did they create the vaccine? Oh yeah it was for the original strain. So have they updated it for Omicron? Nope. But I guess you need proof of the obvious for some reason.

I'm still more protected than with nothing, remember what the very meme you're responding to, has to say about gain of function research?

And if I get sick, acquiring the natural immunity would be much easier for me than for you, because:

_Whatever protection the booster adds is better than no protection.

_The spike genes assimilated from infecting viruses will expand the genetic library of sorts, that each of our immune systems have access to, mostly in order to make antibodies with the appropriate spike receptors.

_The diminished symptoms by both the already vaccine boosted immune system, and any drugs doctors might recommend to my hypothetical case, will make it easier for me to get through the disease.

_I'm young and healthy (nobody's denying the importance of that, cease!)

_I take masks and hygiene seriously and almost 100% of my city's population is vaccinated, so it's still very unlikely to catch it in the first place

_I live in a country with Universal Healthcare where complement drugs would be free or extremely cheap (big pharma still sells to my Single Payer government at a price that covers for muh research and profits, you're being robbed while you shill for them).

Immunotherapy 101 much?

I take vitamin d, iodine, work an active job, walk every day and am under 50 so I'll be good too. I also don't drink pop, energy drinks or smoke.

*Laughs in Mediterranean diet that doesn't normaly require vitamin supplements in the first place, and a mild, yet constant state of training because bohurt, even in exhibition grade, is demanding as all hell*

Jokes aside, good for you, every bit helps.

Although I'm sorry to break this to you, but the vaccine (specially with the booster shot I just had not even an hour ago), protects my lungs better than the fact that I smoke but you don't with your uninformed opinions and immune system (you can give your immune system some military intelligence in a previous debriefing, instead of just allow soldiers to gather intelligence after looting the enemy corpses [Got pleny' of similes from where that one came).

And if it makes it worse and I have to get complementary drugs, I've already paid them for with my taxes, which is why the doctor's are gonna give it to me for free at the hospital, and sold at affordable prices at the chemist's, (The British word for drugstore has some crispy ring to it, don't you think?).

The problem with that metaphor is that your body already is full of trillions of viruses and we need to learn to coexist as we have with all flu type viruses. You want combat, but I seek harmony.

Vaccines, drugs, healthy habits and more research is what we need to achieve that harmony you seek.

Seriously, now I'm not talking with the debate bro persona, I'm not dismissing the nuggets of truth in between the heavily biased material that's more reporting on papers than both reporting on papers and looking at them yourself, which is something you should do to be smarter.

And what if becoming smarter makes you understand progressive ideals better, would that really be that bad? I dunno man, it's seriously frustrating and I'm doing this thinking on all humanity, including your freaking self.

It's clear that you don't want to learn about opposing positions just by system, and even tho I act like it entertains me when I'm debunking stuff, it really is just my happy mask over the fact that these willful ignorance makes me feel more sadness than anything else and I dunno, whatever man.

Have a nice day and stay safe.