Imgflip Logo Icon

2/3 required to convict. If convicted on DMV charge, separate vote to be held determining which power is removed.

2/3 required to convict. If convicted on DMV charge, separate vote to be held determining which power is removed. | Impeachment trial for SurlyKong69; Charges are:
-Abuse of power as DMV employee
-Drawing attention to IncognitoGuy's negative IQ | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
254 views 13 upvotes Made by Captain_Scar 4 years ago in IMGFLIP_PRESIDENTS
71 Comments
[deleted]
4 ups, 4y
No. This is being petty, and IG won anyways, so what does it matter?
5 ups, 4y,
1 reply
Innocent
3 ups, 4y,
1 reply
Or guilty of the latter
2 ups, 4y,
1 reply
wut?
3 ups, 4y,
1 reply
He has without a doubt shown a higher IQ
And made igs look like a Joke
2 ups, 4y
Oh

well, I see he didn't lay out his evidence for it, but he was saying earlier that it was in violation of TOS. But that's irrelevant I guess since he doesn't seem to be pursuing that charge.
4 ups, 4y
Impeach him!
4 ups, 4y
Based on personal experience my vote is AYE on the DMV charge.
[deleted]
3 ups, 4y,
1 reply
Hi am I on the jury, or the judge, or the audience? Idk
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
are you in congress?
[deleted]
1 up, 4y,
1 reply
Yes
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
jury
[deleted]
1 up, 4y
Ok
3 ups, 4y,
1 reply
Can I get a list of who's currently in Congress? There's a lot of non- stream users voting on this and I need to know who's votes to count.
1 up, 4y,
1 reply
This is the most up to date I've got imgflip.com/i/5zqefa
Don't know if anything's changed
1 up, 4y,
1 reply
Interesting.
How do we replace F1's seat now that he's HOC?
1 up, 4y,
1 reply
The constitution doesn't seem to specify, so since his seat is IUP, we'll let them choose
1 up, 4y
Sounds like a good plan.
[deleted]
3 ups, 4y,
1 reply
Aye
2 ups, 4y,
2 replies
Heeyyyyy, aren't you that guy that said I worshipped Hitler?
[deleted]
1 up, 4y,
1 reply
Yes, but I can still vote
2 ups, 4y,
1 reply
What religion would you call that?
[deleted]
1 up, 4y,
1 reply
Christianity
2 ups, 4y,
1 reply
why's that?
[deleted]
2 ups, 4y,
2 replies
Because I worship god and not hitler
2 ups, 4y,
1 reply
*God

and I was asking what you would call the worship of Hitler
[deleted]
0 ups, 4y
The common sense party
[deleted]
1 up, 4y,
1 reply
Fixed your comment for yea, this sounds about right for your lvl of rage
[deleted]
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
1. I never said that
2. I am a Christian, so I worship Jesus and god only
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
*God
[deleted]
0 ups, 4y
It didn’t autocorrect God for some reason
[deleted]
2 ups, 4y,
1 reply
2 ups, 4y,
1 reply
Bowser says that's Christianity though
[deleted]
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
0 ups, 4y
Well pardon me for not praying to Mary
2 ups, 4y,
1 reply
Impeach
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
You're really joining the ig bandwagon?
1 up, 4y
He's my friend
[deleted]
3 ups, 4y,
2 replies
Aye on the DMV charge. We all know if the roles were reversed you'd all be in a hurry to impeach IG.
5 ups, 4y,
1 reply
That’s simply not true.

Remember that roles *were* reversed last term, when IG lost the election and became a Congressperson. The ruling Libertarian Alliance campaigned hard against IG but didn’t impeach IG *when he was a Congressperson.* Why?

One good reason is that Congresspeople simply don’t truly have “power.” They’re not stream mods. They don’t appoint Cabinet members. All they do is vote and represent their Party.

These are good bases for outlawing the impeachment of Congresspersons entirely, since it’s turned the whole business of impeachment into a petty exercise. When the dust settles, I will move to amend the Constitution to remove Congresspeople from the list of those who can be impeachment.

Another thing to consider: In functioning democracies, winning parties have to share *some* power with the opposition. You can campaign hard, but after the election, you have to work together. You can defeat your opponents’ ideas in votes, but you don’t get to remove your opponents from the political arena entirely and drive your opponents off the face of the earth.

Tl;dr — IG is being a sore winner with these two bogus impeachments.
[deleted]
2 ups, 4y,
1 reply
"Remember that roles *were* reversed last term, when IG lost the election and became a Congressperson. The ruling Libertarian Alliance campaigned hard against IG but didn’t impeach IG *when he was a Congressperson.* Why?"

Because I committed no impeachable offences, unlike SurlyKong.
3 ups, 4y,
1 reply
You still haven't charged me with anything halfway through the trial and you got the balls to talk about "impeachable offenses?" You STILL haven't charged me with anything.
Find the law that says anything I supposedly did comes close to an impeachable offense. I dare you I double dog dare you.
[deleted]
1 up, 4y,
1 reply
Why don’t you try reading Scar’s image you’re commenting on?
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
Again. You still haven't charged me with anything.
I know why. You can't admit you know you can't have a trial without a crime, so playing dumb is you're only hope.
[deleted]
1 up, 4y,
1 reply
Yes I have, I charged you with abuse of power when you were a DMV mod.
1 up, 4y
You didn't charge me with jack-shit. You can't just say things, you have to list crimes. There is no abuse of power unless you have power. You can't charge people with crimes you made up. And you know that, which is why you never found a law to back up your lack of charges.
[deleted]
2 ups, 4y
2 ups, 4y,
1 reply
Y tho
[deleted]
0 ups, 4y
Surly intentionally withheld licenses from eligible users, and refused to be a productive DMV mod:
https://imgflip.com/i/5za7ld?nerp=1641293474#com16347756
https://imgflip.com/i/5za7ld?nerp=1641293474#com16346883

And yet he simultaneously handed out licenses to users who AT THAT TIME had never even posted on PRESIDENTS, or haven't even done so since:
https://imgflip.com/i/612qs7
https://imgflip.com/i/60chlg

Plus he also gave me an inappropriate DMV license photo.
1 up, 4y,
1 reply
Nay to the first charge.
And to the second charge could that not be seen as bullying?
[deleted]
2 ups, 4y,
1 reply
Scar is supposed to be the stream owner, so yes that second charge is definitely inappropriate behaviour from him.
0 ups, 4y
Maybe a more appropriate step would be to temporally time out people who personally bully people on the site, not impeachment of a stream owner. I say that oversite might be a good idea, but that might get a little too messy. Just other ideas to consider.
Show More Comments
Created with the Imgflip Meme Generator
IMAGE DESCRIPTION:
Impeachment trial for SurlyKong69; Charges are: -Abuse of power as DMV employee -Drawing attention to IncognitoGuy's negative IQ