The latest science seems to say taking the Kung Flu shot is akin to playing Russian Roulette with contracting MS.

Microsoft

There was a massive surge in still births in Scotland from the various jabs. But then again . . . the various vaccine companies were massively more concerned about profits than dealing with quality control during the manufacturing of their drugs and so that might have had something to do with it.

Nope. But if you're worried about miscarriages, has anybody mentioned to you what coronavirus does to a pregnancy?

Nobody knows what these experimental vaccines are going to do to children down the line.

Yes we do. We've been giving vaccines to children for about a hundred years now and earlier forms of inoculation for in excess of 250 years.

It is a typical vaccine. The mRNA just assembles the dummy copy of the virus in your cells rather than in a lab, and the rest works exactly the same as a vaccine does.

Yes we do! We've had 250some years to study the practical effects and the mRNA you're trying to spread panic about flushes out of your body within two weeks. That's as safe as safe ever gets!

It didn't.

Liar.

The only scientific evidence (READ: PEER REVIEWED) I could find of this assertion made it very, very clear the time frame you mention WAS AN ESTIMATE, and was quite clear that nobody - NOBODY - really knows BECAUSE IT HASN'T BEEN STUDIED YET.

Stop spreading misinformation you know to be untrue.

The time frame of the vaccine effects hasn't been studied yet? Well, the problem with that is, it really actually has quite a lot. But thanks for playing.

That is not what YOU said :

"...and the mRNA you're trying to spread panic about flushes out of your body within two weeks. "

IT DOES NOT. There exists no peer reviewed scientific literature proving such an assertion.

Your own words prove you a liar.

Thank you. I was about to make much the same reply -- sans the personal remark. It's as if these pro-vaxxers think that we have no idea regarding process or history or science. Considering that math and science is forced down the throats of students from public school to college . . . they should rethink the nature of their political propaganda.

"Considering that math and science is forced down the throats of students from public school to college"

It does sound like you've managed to resist much of it.

You DON'T have an idea of the process. Or if you do, you never show it.

You mean like you, oh user of alt accounts to upvote his own postings?

If scientists are correct, then 95% of the population in America carries the inactive Epstein-Barr virus (aka the cause of mononucleosis). It's looking like - but not guaranteed at this point - taking enough Kung Flu shots may kick start the EB virus into turning into a full-blown case of Multiple Sclerosis.

All the more reason to force people to take the Kung Flu shot, right liberals?

Scientists have said no such thing.

... because you said so, right?

Scientific American, today : Epstein-Barr Virus Found to Trigger Multiple Sclerosis

There were already several studies investigating what about COVID-19 was triggering the EB virus to activate. That the EB activation is happening is inarguable according to the science. It's early, but it is looking like loading up on COVID-19 via shots is the triggering mechanism.

Unless you are willing to go on record with peer-reviewed proof that Scientific American is completely wrong about the EB/MS link, now would be a fantastic time to shut up and stop digging your uninformed hole.

Of course EBV is triggered by many things such as unmanaged stress and a secondary infection . . . such as Covid. So, you’re just as likely to get EBV after getting Covid. I personally would rather take my chances with the vaccine than the disease.

Except your logic fails to take into account that 95% of the population had EBV *before* COVID hit. That's the reason for the studies to attempt to explain what is re-triggering dormant EBV in such large numbers. Yes, many things are being looked at, but it is also inarguable the Kung Flu shots load you up with COVID.

One more time for the dense in the audience : it's early in the game. The science may yet prove the Kung Flu shots are not the culprit. However, at this stage of the game it is starting to look like they are the culprit. Walks like a duck, and all that.

No my logic sound. The vaccine doesn’t give you EBV and it doesn’t give you Covid. The vaccine might reactivate EVB already in 95% of the population - just like stress, other illnesses (such as Covid), nutrient deficiency, leaky gut, toxins, etc. do.

Your logic fails because you think the vaccine gives you Covid. On the contrary, the mRNA vaccines don’t even use a dead, or otherwise disabled, virus like traditional vaccines use to trigger your immune system to create antibodies. So, to say the vaccine “loads you up with COVID” is ridiculous.

Not only does the article you cite not say what you're saying - but the ONLY mention of the covid vaccine is actually to say that this could HELP against the EB virus!

Now stop trying to force your narrative to work. It doesn't. It's been wrong from the start.

Exactly where did I ever say that?

Quote : "Scientific American, today : Epstein-Barr Virus Found to Trigger Multiple Sclerosis"

Then I went on to say :

"There WERE ALREADY SEVERAL STUDIES investigating what about COVID-19 was triggering the EB virus to activate. That the EB activation is happening is inarguable according to the science. It's early, but it is looking like loading up on COVID-19 via shots is the triggering mechanism."

Never once did I say ANY of these studies had to do with Scientific American. Hypocrite that you are, you read what you wanted to see not what was there. Most of the studies were well underway, and some completed, before the SA article came out.

YOU INVENTED THAT STRAW MAN TO DETRACT FROM HOW WRONG YOU WERE.

I quote you : "Scientists have said no such thing."

Again, now is a fantastic time for you to put up or shut up, especially in the light that I have provided infinitely more evidence than you.

It's not inarguable. I'm very much arguing it. I'm 100% saying that you're completely wrong about it.

No, you are lying about it. You saw what you wanted to see, not what was there in black and white. You are still very much wrong, but don't have enough courage to own up to it.

Pathetic.

I saw what you posted and what you posted not only didn't say what you said it would but actually argued the exact opposite.

I see you exhibit the characteristics of a coward and liar. Again I quote :

"Scientists have said no such thing."

They have very much said there is a link between Kung Flu and EBV. On this point you are completely wrong. Scientific American said there is a link between EBV and Multiple Sclerosis. Studies are underway trying to prove the causal link between Kung Flu shots and re-activating dormant EBV. So scientists very much are saying EXACTLY THAT.

Whereas you bring "I said so" to the table.

It's pathetic that you have to argue like a child to even participate in an adult conversation. Just sad.

Ok. Scientists have still said no such thing though.

... according to your petulant, uninformed opinion.

You really need to take your toddler-level skills and go back to the kiddie table if you are not willing to provide anything more than "sez you!".