What's the name of her "Whine?" It's a safe bet that it isn't "Manischewitz."

1. It has to be false, and it's not.
2. The Word of God does NOT teach we are not to judge, but rather that we are to make fair and right judgments.
3. You know nothing of the Bible, so you should avoid referring to it- that makes you look foolish.

First, let's make a deal. Once I post proof of what I am saying regarding judging, you will acknowledge that you were wrong. Nothing more than that, just admitting that your arrogant attitude concerning that for which you know nothing is unjustified.

Deal?

Who am I kidding? When confronted with truth and facts, liberals just stick their fingers in their ears and shout, "I cAn'T hEaR yOu! I cAn'T hEaR yOu!"

To start with, the passage which all you shallow liberals typically point to compares the sin in a person's life as wood, either a log or a plank, vs. a splinter. For those who should know better, even their "smaller" sins are much more egregious, because they have knowledge and awareness (allegedly) that the person they are judging does not have. Sin is sin, but God knows when a person is doing so in ignorance (ignorance of the Law is still no excuse). Compare Psalm 19 ( https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Psalm+19%3A12-13&version=ESV )

So in Matthew 7, where we see Jesus stating, "“Judge not, that you be not judged.", He goes on to say, "For with the judgment you pronounce you will be judged, and with the measure you use it will be measured to you." A repentant sinner has no problem being rightly judged, and in fact wants it, as is further seen in that Psalm 19 passage.

But Jesus goes on to explain that those He was speaking to, the religious leaders of that day, and complete hypocrites, that they should first deal with their own sin ("first remove the log from your own eye"), and then goes on to say, " . . . and then you will see clearly to take the speck out of your brother's eye." Even for an unbeliever, without the aid of the Holy Spirit, should be able to follow the progression of what Jesus was actually saying.

Elsewhere in the Bible, we see this:
Let a righteous man strike me—it is a kindness;
let him rebuke me—it is oil for my head;
let my head not refuse it.
- Psalm 141:5

So, if THAT is the attitude of the person who is making right judgments about another, this is precisely the approach we are to take. A nonbeliever can apply some of this, but generally speaking, they haven't the faculties to do so accurately, having rejected the standard of God needed to make right judgments.

And if that isn't clear enough for you, there's this, emphasis added:

1 Corinthians 2:14-16
The natural person does not accept the things of the Spirit of God, for they are folly to him,
and he is not able to understand them because they are spiritually discerned.
THE SPIRITUAL PERSON JUDGES ALL THINGS,
but is himself to be judged by no one.
“For who has understood the mind of the Lord so as to instruct Him?”
But we have the mind of Christ.

"It's pretty presumptive of you to think that because somebody doesn't agree with you, they don't know anything at all about the subject"

"You said in a comment yesterday you're in your 50s, so you should be able to defend your position using facts and logic, right?"

"When your lies, deliberate distortions of what even the basic 10 Commandments say, and totally irrelevant appeal to authority referencing none other that a senile coke dealing terrorist backing B-movie actor whose approach to WH policy was set in accordance to what his wife told the cuckold what her astrologer said to her that day fail, resort to trite second rate ad hominems!"

What I hear you saying is that you are completely flummoxed concerning when and how to judge the actions of others, and that you admit you had no clue about the true meaning of that particular passage.

"deliberate distortions of what even the basic 10 Commandments"
Never referenced the Commandments. This sounds like an attempt to change the subject.

"totally irrelevant appeal to authority"
Reagan is dead, and was never treated as an authority by me. Nor did he wish that on himself. That's the problem with you libs- always projecting your insecurities and flaws on others. Y'all are the ones that worship political authorities as idols.

"resort to trite second rate ad hominems!"
Again, projection on your part- this entire diatribe was everything a "2nd rate ad hominem" was meant to be. And it also appears to have been cobbled together by someone who is either high, or a lot drunk.

It's really pretty simple, Pony Boy.

If I want to know everything there is to know about a certain line of children's toys, I would turn to you, the resident expert. But if I want to know anything about the Word of God, I would hardly turn to either you or Modda, since both of you regularly display an intentional ignorance of what it contains.

Nonetheless, I posted an answer to Modda's nonsense. She was wrong, as one with any sense could have guessed.

btw- It is a little sad watching how you have justified your strange and immature proclivity for MLP. That is 100% serious, without any sarcasm intended.

"to the point where no scientist with any level of academic credibility believes it is literal fact."

"It's not presumptive at all, it's just deflection, that lovely weapon of choice for hypocrites."

Another proof that what I said, "When confronted with truth and facts, liberals just stick their fingers in their ears and shout, "I cAn'T hEaR yOu! I cAn'T hEaR yOu!"" was accurate. I made you an offer, explaining that I was going to settle your misinformation regarding the subject, but you clearly chose to ignore that fact. Octavia could have read it for himself, but he also decided to ignore this.

You literally lied to make your point.

"Where did you hear that?"

Did you do a little Google search and find out that this was the case?

"But I will admit I hadn't googled it til after reading your comment"

So, something as egregious as Democrats enabling a strike force with shoot to kill orders never came up in your typical liberal Fake News™ sources?

Continue to live in your misinformation bubble. Newsflash- there's no 'safety in numbers' on Judgment Day.

"American Family Radio"

Doesn't look to be "far right" based on their website, so I'll chalk that one up to your typical mischaracterizations based on your irrational hatred of Christians. While I find some politically interested programs on my local stations, they really do not focus on it, but rather, focus on the Word of God. There are some programs that are more useful for growth than others, but to each his own.

No, this, of course, is based entirely on your own opinion, something that I would give no credence to whatsoever, despite the fact that I am not familiar with that brand.

"Wait, you mean that that bit ablut [sic] only a mere 144,000 Sainted Chosen plus a handful of Gentiles based on their works will enter the Pearly Gates of something which does not even exist in the Old Testament isn't true?"

Seriously, where do you get these notions? That is from the Book of Revelation, and your premise is absurd at best. It bears some resemblance to what the cult of Jehovah's Witnesses believes, but it is a very bad understanding of that passage.

Liberals have no shame, otherwise they would not be liberals, but wow.

Screenshot away, Zippy.

I note that the subject on judging has been dropped though . . .

"Yeah, 144,000 Jewish people out of all the people to have ever existed on Earth going to Heaven on Judgement Day isn't judging at all."

about*

"I googled it and didn't find anything related to what you said"

Please tell me that I don't have to teach you how to Google. I quickly found all manner of articles, including one from the leftist rag, Newsweek.

"Posting it ETA is when? crickets"

You can't be serious, so I am guessing this is part of your game of gaslighting people for your amusement. Find it yourself- I have no need for your affirmation, so your little petty mind games are useless.