Your Body. Your Choice.

Just like I said yesterday, Larry. You’re a total fraud and you wallow in the misfortunes of others.
You’re despicable.

He chose his own misfortune. I have done everything I can think of to warn people like him and his followers. He took the wrong path. I hope he beats the odds and survives.

Like I’ve said before, I don’t believe you

Wow! A troll said he doesn't believe me. Hold the presses!

It’s “Stop the presses”,Larry.
And very few people believe you

If the presses have not been started, the order is to "hold" them.

Whatever, EdwardRMurrow, or do you picture yourself as Clark Kent?

No. It's Larry Caird. I'm not the one who doesn't have the balls to use his real name.

Fraud?
Sure seems to know what he's talking about, and in detail.

I thought that vaccines were to prevent viruses and such.
When they don’t do that, and those who have received the vax and the umpteen boosters still get and transmit the damn virus, I don’t trust the “science” behind it.
As I have said many times, I have been hip- deep in the public since this shit started, only wore the mask, off and on, for a little more than a month. I haven’t missed a day of work since my cancer operation in Oct 2017. I haven’t had a sniffle, a cough, nothing. I have immunity and I do not need, according to the “science “, a vaccine.

There are many who hadn't caught it before yet are now, so immunity is not a certainty. Long term Covid is also something to consider, in which people show no symptoms until it suddenly becomes way too (as in drastically) late.

Seems I may have caught it Feb 2020 (I wasn't tested as it wasn't known at the time that persistent headaches (9 days straight) and loss/altering sense of taste were symptoms then, and that was the extent of it with me), and was already restricting how often I went around others on account of worries of transmitting the flu or whatever to my bed ridden mother. I haven't been going anywhere lately, and figure I might as well take the shot, maybe soon.

There is the potential for permanent damage to the lungs, heart, brain, so I wouldn't throw caution to the wind on this,,,

I checked the more than 30-years of M-RNA research that preceded the vaccines. Not one of these fully tested processes would cause a face as pretty as mine to change one little bit. Tell you what. I'll cite my sources, if you'll cite yours.

How can you check the data when the manufacturers aren’t releasing it for another 50 years? Do you have a time machine?

Your comment shows that you know nothing about medical science or pharmacological research. New drugs don't get approved because they will never, under any circumstances pose any sort of a risk. They get approved because the preponderance o evidence shows that for the majority of people, the risk of not taking the drug is greater than the risks from taking it. M-RNA vaccines cannot be judged like the old types that contained dead or even live virus in their development. RNA-vaccines have been in development for decades. The biggest success was the one developed for Ebola a few years ago. It uses the same platform, only delivering different RNA. The results, after a number of years of widespread clinical use do not support your unfounded fears.

If everything is hunky dorey and there's nothing to worry about, please explain this: https://www.reuters.com/legal/government/wait-what-fda-wants-55-years-process-foia-request-over-vaccine-data-2021-11-18/

That is easy to explain. You decided to post a link, rather than try to make an intelligent statement. I'll save you the time. Things are never perfect opposites. The world is a big and complex place. If you cannot comprehend complexities, you might be attracted to "Snake Oil Salesmen," who have "simple explanations," for everything. "Make Stupidity Great."

He has expertise.

Do you have either? Or anything, other than the vitriol only self loathing can sire?

What about in a grave from heart failure?

I found this today:

The Long History of mRNA Vaccines
Published
October 06, 2021
By Chris Beyrer
COVID-19 TECHNOLOGY AND INNOVATION VACCINES
Johns Hopkins

Messenger RNA, or mRNA, was discovered in the early 1960s; research into how mRNA could be delivered into cells was developed in the 1970s. So, why did it take until the global COVID-19 pandemic of 2020 for the first mRNA vaccine to be brought to market?

In this explainer, Chris Beyrer talks us through mRNA vaccines’ history, development, and breakthroughs.

THERE’S A BIG GAP BETWEEN WHEN THE FIRST MRNA FLU VACCINE WAS TESTED IN MICE IN THE 1990S AND WHEN THE FIRST MRNA VACCINES FOR RABIES WERE TESTED IN HUMANS IN 2013. WHAT WAS HAPPENING IN THE INTERIM?

The early years of mRNA research were marked by a lot of enthusiasm for the technology but some difficult technical challenges that took a great deal of innovation to overcome.

The biggest challenge was that mRNA would be taken up by the body and quickly degraded before it could “deliver” its message—the RNA transcript—and be read into proteins in the cells.

The solution to this problem came from advances in nanotechnology: the development of fatty droplets (lipid nanoparticles) that wrapped the mRNA like a bubble, which allowed entry into the cells. Once inside the cell, the mRNA message could be translated into proteins, like the spike protein of SARS-CoV-2, and the immune system would then be primed to recognize the foreign protein.

SO, WHAT HAPPENED ONCE THEY FIGURED OUT THIS TECHNOLOGY?

The first mRNA vaccines using these fatty envelopes were developed against the deadly Ebola virus, but since that virus is only found in a limited number of African countries, it had no commercial development in the U.S.

THEN COVID-19 HIT … WHAT HAPPENED THEN?

Remember, the COVID-19 pandemic spurred manufacturers to develop dozens of potential vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 and brought tremendous increases in funding. Some of those vaccines used traditional methods involving adenovirus as the spike protein delivery system—such as the Johnson & Johnson vector vaccine.

Thanks to decades of research and innovation, mRNA vaccine technology was ready. With COVID, this technology got its moment and has proven to be extremely safe and effective. Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine is the first mRNA product to achieve full FDA approval in the U.S.

WHAT’S NEXT?

Already, vaccine manufacturers are developing mRNA vac

Lipid insulation, that's cool.

Think of the M-RNA process as using a nano-fat "van." The van delivers whatever M-RNA package to the chosen destination. It worked with Ebola, is working with Covid-19, and one of the scientists who developed the Pfizer vaccine says she is working on a cancer vaccine.

Looking at that solution seems so obvious, so simple, yet it's pretty amazing how they came up with it, a self protecting delivery system which doesn't hamper itself when it does what it's supposed to do.

His Body. His Choice. His Death.

What part of "over 99.5% survival rate" are you too stupid to understand?