Bike Fall

Finally, an educated citizen!

take your horse pills antivaxxer. but stay out of the hospital, they have humans to treat, not horses.

Ivermectin has been prescribed for human use for a long time. Your colossal ignorance is not an argument.

A different form of it, not the horse one.

No, just larger dose. Y'know, for like horses and stuff, because they're bigger. Doesn't mean ivermectin is bad for you, the dose makes the poison. Same way too much water or alcohol will kill you.

Bigger pills? Yeah, that sure covers it.

So vaccine bad,
Horse worthy dollop of Ivermectin good,
and for a flu which was faked to unseat some fella last year who's still out?

k

Ivermectin is a paste, not a pill. Human doses have been clinically proven to prevent, treat and reduce the span of COVID.

Human doses of the vaccine have killed thousands already, where as ivermectin has claimed less than 5 victims. Ivermectin does not have permanent side effects, the vaccine does.

In conjunction, they could save many lives, that's what I care about. What I don't care for is people who just want others to take the vaccine to show compliance, but don't actually care about supporting alternative treatment options to reduce the mortality rates.

I actually care about the death toll, do you?

https://www.fda.gov/consumers/consumer-updates/why-you-should-not-use-ivermectin-treat-or-prevent-covid-19

The problem with disseminating fanfic is that your material is rather thoroughly bogus a lot.

You're quoting a government article, and if that doesn't convince you it's irrelevant, take note on how they don't cite their own sources/studies. It's ridiculous that in this day and age people still cite articles as evidence when the article contains no evidence. I'm no disseminating anything. If you don't care about death rates then just say so. You don't have to attack me because I present a better form of treatment for the ill. If you think the only way to handle a virus is to vaccinate and let the infected die then I do not believe you should be allowed to disseminate your own opinions.

Good grief, please tell me you're trolling with your silliness.

Ohhhhhh, I get it. I had to go to your profile to understand. Please schedule an appointment with your psychiatrist (if you have one) and request a bipolar screening. This is important to catch early on and the longer you fight it the more likely you are to end up in a bad place.

Don't worry, it's not worth arguing with people who aren't willing to actually thoroughly research what they are talking about. I like how they use an article with absolutely no evidence or studies whatsoever. If they don't care about death rates from vaccines, such as countries that had no "Covid" deaths BEFORE the vaccine was invented, then that just shows what kind of person they are. Don't worry, I've done my homework, and I know whats actually happening right now.

So essentially the researchers had taken a study that was intentionally skewed to demonize ivermectin by not adjusting the data caused by breathing failure. In other terms, ivermectin has promising results in most situations except for when the victim's breathing is compromised. Although ivermectin reduces viral load, it's not an intervention that can assist in ventilation or removal of lesions from the lungs. The researches who conducted this study must have known this and chose to publish the data without adjustment. For some reason it bothers me (as if it shouldn't?) that people choose to withhold the truth and let people die because it would instead be admitting they were wrong, or admitting a certain party was right. We could save more people by using these proven interventions. Thanks for the study.

Also, other people, if this isn't enough, here is an article from NCBI themselves, quite literally the US national library of medicine

Therapeutic Advances:
Meta-analysis of 15 trials found that ivermectin reduced risk of death compared with no ivermectin (average risk ratio 0.38, 95% confidence interval 0.19–0.73; n = 2438; I2 = 49%; moderate-certainty evidence). This result was confirmed in a trial sequential analysis using the same DerSimonian–Laird method that underpinned the unadjusted analysis. This was also robust against a trial sequential analysis using the Biggerstaff–Tweedie method. Low-certainty evidence found that ivermectin prophylaxis reduced COVID-19 infection by an average 86% (95% confidence interval 79%–91%). Secondary outcomes provided less certain evidence. Low-certainty evidence suggested that there may be no benefit with ivermectin for “need for mechanical ventilation,” whereas effect estimates for “improvement” and “deterioration” clearly favored ivermectin use. Severe adverse events were rare among treatment trials and evidence of no difference was assessed as low certainty. Evidence on other secondary outcomes was very low certainty.

Well shucky-ducky, aren't muh feelz hurt?
Not really!
And certainly nowhere near as yours are steaming out your ears.

Anyways, you keep flinging your ignorance at the wall like it was monkey poo hoping it'll cover up, well, your ignorance. Bound to work eventually. Oh wait, it already has!

Anyways, I begin to grow bored with your horse apothecary a lot?

toodles!