Republicans at the crucifixion

heh heh

He was arrested for political crime, so it actually reflects a democratic modus operanda. He did comply. He gave his life. Obviously this is made by an ignorant atheist religion hater that has little to no knowledge.

Highly doubtful Pilate tried Jesus for being the God of a rather small province under Roman rule and oppression.
Sedition against the Roman Empire might have taken priority docket-wise as far as he was concerned, especially since the potential outcome could lead to his head in a basket at the hands to the rebels or of his bosses back home.

Except they had no such authority, and that and other notions (ie the Roman ritual of releasing prisoners on the eve of execution to appease unruly subjects nearing one of their holidays because submitting to the will of those you wish to subjugate - for killing a Centurian, no less! - must have been how the Romans paxxed their empire) was written in later by the very Romans who later wrote down those tomes and saw that demonizing Jesus's own people was preferred over demonizing themselves when hijacking those people's religion. If he took that approach, Saul/Paul's "If you can't beat them, make them follow you" would have ended before it got a foot set at the starting line.

It gets better, the two Jesuses who were sons of the Father, both arrested, tried, convicted, sentenced, and about to be executed at the same time for the same crime of sedition against the Roman Empire buuuuuuut one of gets released by his judge and governor? Coincidence? Or an addition to a story rumored to may have originally ended with the miracle of divine intervention in the form of Jesus getting spared. Now I can't find any written passages to support the possibility that BOTH seditious Jesuses were simply one and the same, but it does answer the question of WHY there were two Jesuses who were sons of the Father, both arrested, tried, convicted, sentenced, and about to be executed at the same time for the same crime of sedition in that story.

Even if it that wasn't the case, why did Y'ehsua bar Abba later get his name changed to "Barabbas" while the other Y'eshua got called "Jesus Christ"?

⚠️TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN, THIS IS NOT MEANT TO HURT EURO FEELZ, IT'S OUT THERE, KINDLY LOOK IT UP⚠️

It doesn't hurt our feelz. Its just completely inaccurate even from a non-Christian historical perspective. It looks like someone pieced together a bunch of conspiracy theories instead of doing actual research.

If you do actual research, you'll find that he was crucified for claiming to be the Israelites king or "King of the Jews". There wasn't a double or whatever nonsense your spreading. The other person you are talking about was being tried for murder. Two different crimes by two very different people.

False.

Sedition, look it up,
Barabbas, look it up.

Again, you need to do some research, and if we are wrong you'll have to provide actual evidence. You are a known leftist caught lying constantly.

What, no Bibles in St Petersburg, Pietrov?

You realize that Christianity is flourishing in Russia right? Also character assassination instead of refutation? Typical leftist idiocy.

Hey, we agree! Russians do nothing but seed typical leftist idiocy.

Lol, they may be assumptions but they aren’t baseless and not agreeing with your hate god and white men philosophy doesn’t make me a conservative or a Christian. Though there is certainly nothing wrong with either.

You support the narrative of USA and it’s founders are bad and jump to convict white Christian’s of all kinds of propaganda.