I didn't actually offer my opinion about murdering children or any age. I was just pointing out that allowing parents to decide to murder their children for the 1st 9 months seems arbitrary. If we allow parents to decide to murder their children for the 1st 9 months because they don't want to be parents, why stop there? If we're ok with parents murdering children because they don't want to parent, why cut that off at 9 months? If we're ok with it, maybe parents might change their mind after a few years? Maybe the child is difficult to parent and too much work. Why cut the decision off not to parent after just the 1st 9 months? I don't get the logic. The obvious alternative is not to allow parents to kill their children at any age, but I'll let you come to that conclusion yourself.