Rather than deal with the data and the argument, turn to name calling to dismiss that which you cannot actually defend against- if I knew nothing other than this about you, I would know with 100% certainty that you are a liberal.
"First of all, bongino is a small news source." Ad hominem. The accuracy of the article is not dependent upon the "size" of the news source. And like many conservative sources, Bongino may well have a larger audience on any given day than any one of the useless talking heads on CNN/MSNBC/et. al., so even that argument is fallacious. Nonetheless, all Bongino is doing is passing along the information from an organization that does studies like this professionally. If you cannot deal with the cold, hard facts of the study, perhaps you should be careful who you call "stupid"?
"you can see that it’s so far on the right side it’s stupid." Ad hominem, based on your personal bias. Anything reasonable and true sounds radical to someone who hates reality- you would not be a liberal without hating reality, hence the typical embracing of failed ideologies like Socialism & Progressivism.
"You conservatives are always on about how every single left wings news source is fake" That is because they are, and so clearly biased as to be entirely useless in determining the facts, and this is demonstrably so: https://www.newsbusters.org/
"So in return, the roles could be reversed and we might as well call you out for fake news." If it were true, indeed you could, but you have made zero attempt to prove this theory. "Could" is not the same thing as "should". That unintentional moment of truth is the closest you came in your little ad hominem whine to being correct.
"Smh." Normally, when someone types that out, it is hyperbole, but I honestly think I heard the rattling of the 2 or 3 brain cells- matter of fact, I think that sound is what woke me up 11 hours ago.
Yes- that last paragraph was ad hominem, and it accomplished furthering the discussion just as much as yours did.
