Someone didn’t read our disinformation policy, or is unable to discern that insisting the moon is made of cheese violates it.

same

Ah yes: That delicate art form that Trumpists have done their best to murder.

If you are a satirist who knows what he’s doing — and you are — then we cool

haha Poe's Law go brrr

Unfortunately a lot of people either don't recognize or understand satire...... or sarcasm for that matter.

What is PoliticsTOO’s “disinformation policy”?

Glad you asked!

Read it. Read it again if you need to. It’s pretty simple, and 99% of our commenters have no problem complying with it.

The other 1%? Beware!

i love the CCP part! it's right wingers within the CCP making those troll posts tho :) the left wingers know how corrupt the CCP is :)

Where does Trump cringe fall into place here?

https://i.imgflip.com/5niogi.jpg

The guy you flagged has been harassing me on all of my images thank you.

We love it when people post on social media and expect no one to challenge them they literally believe they have a "right" to spew their bs and others who don't agree have no "right" to challenge it

I welcome and encourage your response the one I in turn provided when YOU challenged me to do so.

Still waiting on that one...

Hey, do you have documentation of the deleted comment(s)? I'd like to read them and by who.

I didn’t think to screenshot. It was paragraphs’ worth of belligerent antivaxxing commentary mixed in with Bitchute links and other debunked RWNJ nonsense, all expressed with the typical “do your research libtrad” narcissism indicating no openness to competing views. My mod logs will tell you who it was.

I don't get into the environmental debate too much because I'm largely on the liberal side of that issue, but at what point would objection to environmental policy be flagged as disinformation?

Or did I misread that, and only claims that the climate isn't changing will not be tolerated?

you can deny it all you want. posting false info to legitimize your denial you cannot do.

Why is wanting to conserve nature no longer a conservative position?

That's a False Conclusion. We conservatives love nature and you don't find many conservatives who oppose infringements upon public land (as an example). But we're specifically referring to climate change here, and denying that is not the same as conserving nature.

So a question is now a capitalized Conclusion. Okay...

You really put a lot of stock in labels like "conservative" and "liberal," don't you? I guess that's because your self-knowledge is absolute.

Chill, dude. You may have been asking a question, and if so I apologize for making assumptions, but the amount of times I've seen people in this stream immediately equate being conservative with being anti-conservation is unreal. So you'll pardon me if I try to skip a few steps and make the logical assumption as to what you mean given where I am.

Ah, I see. So you can call me out, but I can't?

Sounds legit...This is why it's so hard to have meaningful dialogue down here. Ya'll jump on minor errors and don't let go.

I'm not sure how you got that from my meme, which I thought was kind of poking fun at myself. Perhaps we both need chill pills.

Perhaps.