To be fair, the generation in its 70s and 80s now is the children of that generation, so if you meet an octogenarian, he or she (okay, probably she) more likely protested against the Vietnam war than for school segregation.
Pick up a history book sometime. The people protesting the war were beaten in the streets and thrown in jail. That isn't something that happens to the majority. Nice attempt at rewriting history though!
They were teens and twenties then -- the people who were clinging to the old order were people who WERE older. If in 1962 you were a 30-something, poorly-educated white person who felt threatened by desegregation, you'd be 90-something now.
We made the progress that we did because people who were minorities organized and spoke up, but also because of generational change. The baby boomers (as cringe as they sometimes are) moved the dial.
My point is, you're not seeing the generational differences among people older than you . . . a dangerous lack of perspective. The cops and authorities beating protestors in 1964 WERE NOT boomers (the very oldest boomers turned 18 that year).
YOUR GENERATION WOULDN'T SHOW A HUSBAND AND WIFE SLEEPING IN THE SAME BED ON TV AND RIOTED WHEN BLACK PEOPLE WANTED TO GO TO COLLEGE; PEOPLE TODAY ARE SO SENSITIVE