Only nerds will understand the implications of this meme.

Remember the time you lied that physics proves masks are essentially useless junk, claimed expertise in physics, went to great lengths to avoid stating or even naming the specific Laws which might prove you right and then got exposed as a liar by a picture proving the exact opposite of your claims? That was awesome!!

If you don't understand the meme, perhaps you should try asking someone who didn't catch you lying about being a physics whiz to explain it to you. Maybe try Duston07; seems like they understood it.

Actually, I referred you to a simple meme that spoke to several principles.

One of the most basic ones is that flow directs towards the path of least resistance, rendering your core arguments moot.

That kind of sophistication clearly taxed you beyond your finite capacities - thereby turning all your taunts back on yourself.

And I spoke to the coughs and sneezes point many months before you ever posted anything on the subject.

But again, all that requires you to think instead of spouting dogma and trash talk.

Thanks for repeatedly making your mental failures evident to everyone here nevertheless.

"If a bathtub fills in two minutes or fifteen , it doesn't matter, it gets filled"

Remember saying that? I agree that "If a bathtub fills in two minutes [implied unmasked time-frame] or fifteen [implied masked time-frame], it doesn't matter, it gets filled" (let's ignore the fact that deploying that statement as a defensive argument for your anti-mask agenda simultaneously acknowledges masks work and demonstrates you're fully aware that you're lying about masks being "useless, symbolic junk")...just one problem: unmasked and masked fill rates are what makes all the difference when it comes to an air-handler's supplementary capacity for exchanging & filtering air. But you considered that, carried the computation out to its end and pushed your "masks are essentially useless, symbolic junk" lie anyway, didn't you? Because...you know...air -handler exchange rate calculations are child's-play to someone well-versed in physics and your "physics tested at maximal", right?

Multiple errors by you.

The flow rate concept applied to not filtration but BYPASS.

The symbolism comment was by Anthony Fauci. I trust you as a mask zombie defer to him.

Etc.

Wow...you can't even tell when a comment is about filtration and the ability of an air handler to effectively sequester mask bypass without being overwhelmed.

It's absolutely hilarious that your own bathtub analogy rendered you unable to comprehend the conversation.

Although it was clearly indicated and contextualized by your own bathtub analogy, you've demonstrated that someone needs to baby-step you through it: two minutes to fill the tub = no mask. 15 minutes to fill the tub = masked with bypass. Understand?

An air-handler has a fixed rate at which it can remove air from a room, filter it and return it to the room. Still with me?

So if a bathtub (or room) fills in two minutes (no masks), that's more than the air-handler will manage in terms of filtration/sequestration. But if the bathtub (or room) fills in 15 minutes (masks), the air handler can remove air from the room (bathtub) filter it and return it to the room (bathtub) faster than the room (bathtub) can fill. For someone whose "physics tested at maximal" you certainly seem to be struggling with such a simple concept.

Remember being challenged to show everyone the entire conversation from whence you sourced de-contexualized comments from Fauci? Interestingly, having been challenged, instead of showing the entire conversation, you said "I've looked at the "context," and it's still ass-covering backpedaling" --which roughly translates to "No-one needs to see the entire conversation; it's what I say it is -believe me." to anyone familiar with how grifters run their scams. But sure..let's all pay no attention to the whole conversation and instead focus on purposely decontextualized snippets a proven liar claims supports their assertion.

His term - not mine - was calling them "largely symbolic." Elsewhere he said they were inconsequential compared to what people should really be focused on, which was social distancing.

No amount of pleading "context" will change the core of his points each time.

Your argument can not be rescued.

...said the liar who want people to trust his decontextualized snippet rather than show everyone the entire conversation.

"Actually, I referred you to a simple meme that spoke to several principles."
"One of the most basic ones is that flow directs towards the path of least resistance, rendering your core arguments moot."
"And I spoke to the coughs and sneezes point many months before you ever posted anything on the subject."

It's funny how you claim to have addressed the "coughs and sneezes point many months before" yet, when priorly pressed on the matter of your "useless, symbolic junk" claim, you'd nothing to offer except dodges, excuses, repeated pointing to "evidentiary" memes which are nothing but allegorical garbage and weak fall-backs involving vague references to fluid dynamics and blatantly false capture percentages --nevermind that bypass is only a significant issue when masks are improperly fitted. Kinda seems like you're counting on people not knowing that so they'll fall for your scam and go without masks.

Actually, anyone of the most basic observational skills can observe the principles for themselves.

Kind of like gravity or anything else you can apply scientific rational thought to.

Your repeated taunts polemics are just making you a comedy pinata instead of a scientifically minded analyst. Your junk arguments are not helped by the trash talk and bogus claims of scam or anything else.

Said the liar who wouldn't provided anything other than his own allegorical meme garbage as proof.

I suppose that as long as were on the subject of rookie mistakes that wouldn't be made by someone whose "physics tested at maximal" we should probably address the fact that you were demonstratedly unaware that pressure is a function of gravity. Someone whose "physics tested at maximal" would be completely, utterly aware of that.

As I not only was but stated as much. Your meme just failed to indicate clearly why this was in any way paradoxical or insomnia-worthy.

Your observational skills just tested at zero.

You should be less cocky. It'll cushion your falls.

"As I not only was but stated as much."

As you not only was but stated as much what? A rookie? A liar? Someone who barely has any grasp of physics at all? Yeah, you've already those things transparently obvious.

If, on the other hand, you're trying refer to where you said " pressure is an effect of gravity" in attempt to re-write history so you didn't make that rookie mistake; it's not going to work; it's over, you did it, it's done. And, having been done, your claim that your "physics tested at maximal" is proven a lie; no-one whose "physics tested at maximal" would ever mistake an effect for a function.

....said the liar whose self-professed knowledge of physic "tested at maximal" and then subsequently went on to claim "pressure is an effect of gravity".

Perhaps you remember lying that "a virus really doesn't care about droplet stopping, it's going to get around, face mask or no face mask." after asserting that "masks are essentially useless symbolic junk" despite the fact that the primary transmission vector for COVID is aerosolized mucosal secretions and masks are proven to drastically reduce mucosal particulate emissions when worn. But let's not stop there; apparently, according to you, "masks stop viruses about as well as pants stop farts"...and yet, while methane easily transits through both the fabric of pants and underwear, for some inexplicable reason, underwear -despite its exceedingly loose weave- stops the brown with nary a transfer to pants. Kinda weird that, for someone whose "physics tested at maximal years ago", you're apparently unaware of the gargantuan size difference between methane molecules and aerosolized mucosal secretions. But you're fully aware of that, aren't you? Someone whose "physics tested at maximal" would never make such a rookie mistake.

Your primary vector claim rests on the same kind of undocumented assertion you keep misaccusing me of. But it doesn't especially matter, since CDC orthodoxy was that mRNA programming injections (they are not actual vaccines) prevented retransmission. Except they do. Seems now in the UK something like 74% of the claimed onpasses now are VIA THE VAXXED.

Ouch.

PLUS the Captain-Obvious fact that natural immunity is over 1300% more effective than "vaccine" at preventing vectoring.

Ouch again.

"PLUS the Captain-Obvious fact that natural immunity is over 1300% more effective than "vaccine" at preventing vectoring."

Really? Are you so disconnected from reality that you think a vaccine inside your own body prevents a virus from vectoring from someone else's body? Because that's how that sentence reads. LOLOLOLOLOLOL!!!!

And let's see your proof of that "1300%". You do have proof, right, Liar?

....said the liar who obviously hadn't checked with the CDC, virologists, microbiologists or even a common, run-of-the-mill physician.

"they are not actual vaccines"

Awww...you think you can argue with the dictionary....that's cute.

"Seems now in the UK something like 74% of the claimed onpasses now are VIA THE VAXXED."

Yes. You really don't understand how vaccines work, do you?

No vaccine prevents contraction; all vaccines prime your immune system to detect and fight infection. That's VACCINE 101. In some cases, your immune system is primed so well that it clobbers an incoming pathogen as soon as it gets a foot in the door. In other cases, your immune system is primed but a pathogen is able to get in and start setting up shop before the the immune system clobbers it. How are you evidencedly unpossessing of such basic knowledge?

...said the guy who got caught lying.

You just claimed the "error" was ignorant (it wasn't error in either case), which means you admit the liar here is you.

...said the guy who got caught lying in an effort to sweep everything under the rug.

As if with your level of delusion you would know.
_____

35 responses to me today, XiaoJia? You're not just a beserk stalker, you're mentally ill.

Aww...that was weak, liar.

Project much, CR01?

You sound like the expert on projection by now.
_____

35 responses to me today, XiaoJia? You're not just a beserk stalker, you're mentally ill.

Sorry, but you're the one accusing me of things you're doing.

"pressure is an effect of gravity "

function [ˈfəNG(k)SH(ə)n]
NOUN
3. a thing dependent on another factor or factors.

Without mass, there's no gravity. Without gravity to act on that mass, there's no pressure. Pressure is a function of gravity. So you're saying you're right and the dictionary is wrong, then?

function [ˈfəNG(k)SH(ə)n]
NOUN
3. a thing dependent on another factor or factors.

Without mass, there's no gravity, without gravity to act on that mass, there's no pressure. Pressure is a function of gravity. Sorry, what was that you said about "repeatedly making your mental failures evident to everyone here"? and being hoist on one's own petard?

"Without mass."

Water possesses mass.

Meme fail.

Please point out the place where I said water has no mass.

"Without mass, there's no gravity.
_____

35 responses to me today, XiaoJia? You're not just a beserk stalker, you're mentally ill.

Without mass, there's no gravity. (period, end of discrete sentence) It's a singular, stand-alone factual statement. Nowhere contained within does it say "water has no mass", liar.

So you can't tell the punctuative difference between a comma and a period? Oh, wait, yes you can -you're just making a scrambling attempt at creating a false narrative by deliberately changing the punctuation. Nice try, but you just exposed yourself as a liar again.

Copy/paste preserves original punctuation. Caught in your own lie.
_____

35 responses to me today, XiaoJia? You're not just a beserk stalker, you're mentally ill.

Wow...there's no lie you won't tell. And the evidence you're lying is, in fact, right there in from of everyone's eyes. You do know that these comments aren't editable once their posted, right?