No you said -and I quote- "I wouldn't know." in answer to a question concerning how bots function. Having declared ignorance of said functioning of bots, nothing you have to say about bots thereafter has any weight whatsoever. You defeated yourself. Deal with it.

Bluessol beating himself again? 😄

And how!!

Says the Minneapolis resident who voted to defund the police to enable the murder of more of its citizens. 😂 talk about beating yourself.

I'm not a Minneapolis resident. Try again.

Let's recap: so far you've ​declared someone a bot, admitted that you don't know how bots function (thus classifying yourself as unqualified to judge whether you're dealing with a bot or not), declared that not having information isn't ignorance (you should probably look up the word "ignorance" before trying to use it in a sentence) tried to claim that ignorance is intelligence, indirectly laid claim to clairvoyance and asserted that I "pretend to know what isn't known." *Do point out for everyone where I pretended to know what isn't known.* Oh...and at no point did I ask "how boys operate" so it's looking like we can add blatant falsehoods to the list of your transgressions.

"I never challenged the accuracy,"

So is that an admission that you can see Arizona Governor Doug Ducey is either setting up a mechanic to prevent Arizona schools from receiving funds or setting up a mechanic to ensure that COVID outbreaks continue?