Imgflip Logo Icon

The survival of the stream is more important than a law

The survival of the stream is more important than a law | Okay we are repelling the LGBTQ law (which I didn't vote on) to try to bring back stream and IG's mod; Any objections? | image tagged in wubbzymon's wubbtastic template,law | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
174 views 4 upvotes Made by .Mystery_Man. 3 years ago in IMGFLIP_PRESIDENTS
On the way out memeCaption this Meme
34 Comments
3 ups, 3y,
1 reply
No objection from me as Stream Owner, happy to go back to Imgflip's standard for NSFW.
1 up, 3y,
2 replies
If IG accepts this resolution can he have his Mod back?
2 ups, 3y,
1 reply
Perhaps Cow | image tagged in perhaps cow | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
I'm inclined to, but I asked IG about one of the permanent user bans he put in place.

Can't find a vote on it, can ex-officio HOC just ban whoever they want from the stream?
1 up, 3y,
1 reply
No idea dog with a computer | image tagged in no idea dog with a computer | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
Not being a mod here, I have no idea who that was. Generally speaking I don’t think so, I think a vote would be necessary.

If it was a suspected WN alt, however, I don’t think it would be necessary to take a vote. That seems like an executive function that the President could exercise himself or delegate to others in the government.
2 ups, 3y,
1 reply
mystery man | Mystery Banned User | image tagged in mystery man | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
The user post/comment ban I asked IG about is not a WN account.

Based on WN's past activity, would be fine for any Owner/Moderator to stream ban those accounts on sight and ask questions later.
[deleted]
2 ups, 3y,
1 reply
It may have been Waldo, who kept making alts and his accounts deleted after a few minutes.
1 up, 3y,
1 reply
You put a permanent post/comment ban on
imgflip.com/user/Abdul-Kareem

Where was the vote for that account to be perma-banned from I_P?
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
That was the troll, Richard Chill. He has also been banned from the stream for a week.
1 up, 3y,
8 replies
Where was the vote to ban imgflip.com/user/Abdul-Kareem
1 up, 3y,
1 reply
Yes, that account was RichardChill’s alt — GreenieMeanie with a change of paint — he admitted it was his on this occasion and several others, and as others pointed out the GreenieMeanie connection is there in his profile tagline as well.

Voted-on bans necessarily encompass alts of users, otherwise it’s toothless and pointless.
1 up, 3y
Question. Since screenshots can easily be fabricated with false, incomplete or misleading info, where is that actual comment?
1 up, 3y
you gonna give IG mod back as agreed?
1 up, 3y,
1 reply
Do not question the correct. Check his account, it says Congratulations GreenieMeanie, RichardChill24's old username. And as for Nixon, he posted something supporting Richard and Richard admitted it was his alt.
1 up, 3y
Thank you for confirming imgflip.com/user/Abdul-Kareem account was banned without a vote.
1 up, 3y
It's a confirmed Richard alt
[deleted]
1 up, 3y,
1 reply
F1Fan already answered your question. We voted to ban RichardChill24. That includes his alts.
1 up, 3y
You mean *suspected alt(s)
[deleted]
1 up, 3y,
1 reply
No we're all sure of this: https://imgflip.com/i/5gir2s#com13066150
1 up, 3y
Thank you for confirming your ban against imgflip.com/user/Abdul-Kareem account was unilateral, without a vote, based on conjecture.
0 ups, 3y
I don’t know where that comment (screencapped memechat) was posted. It would be too burdensome to find and it’s not strictly necessary to satisfy your concerns since there is other evidence that’s conclusive.

imgflip.com/i/5gir2s#com13066150

Check that comment, which IG linked below. This comment is RichardChill commenting (using all sorts of RichardChill-specific tics like emojis and “cope”) as Abdul-Kareem in protest of his ban.

How could this person have had access to a Memechat between RichardChill and a global mod unless he was actually RichardChill? Yes, in theory RichardChill could have screencapped that and then passed it along to a friend of his but now we’re really getting into the weeds.

You mention the concept of fabricated screenshots. Well, in this unique case you can actually ask Ser himself whether the memechat was fabricated if you still have concerns.

The mods of this stream made a determination this account is RichardChill and the reasoning is significantly above speculation and conjecture.

If you disagree and have solid evidence it’s not Richard, the proper way to challenge a user ban passed by Congress is through a formal impeachment proceeding or Congressional motion.
1 up, 3y,
1 reply
It’s RichardChill24’s alt account and to prevent him accessing the stream for a week, we needed to ban all of his accounts.
1 up, 3y
Whoa, who gave you Imgflip's alt detector?

Ok, so suspected alt accounts can be banned unilaterally on I_P by Stream Owners/Moderators without a vote?
[deleted]
1 up, 3y,
1 reply
I'm not accepting until I have confirmation that I'm getting my mod back, which Finlayson still has yet to provide.
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
[deleted]
1 up, 3y
Deal, but not until Finlayson agrees. I don't trust him one bit.
2 ups, 3y
No I have nothing to say but tbh IG took things a little too sourisly with making a new stream tbh he is the only one complaing about being ban (the only one I see) but I guess I see where he is coming from
[deleted]
1 up, 3y
No objections
1 up, 3y
Ok
[deleted]
1 up, 3y,
1 reply
Test
(Theres a bug going around imgflip where you cant see image comments)
Also, no objections
0 ups, 3y,
2 replies
I see the comment
[deleted]
0 ups, 3y
But i dont
[deleted]
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
When you leave the image and click it again, do u see it
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
Yes, try going to norifacations
[deleted]
0 ups, 3y
I can only see the comment if i go through notifs...
Weird
On the way out memeCaption this Meme
Created with the Imgflip Meme Generator
IMAGE DESCRIPTION:
Okay we are repelling the LGBTQ law (which I didn't vote on) to try to bring back stream and IG's mod; Any objections?